plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
(.....hurl.....)
He would side with ISIS over an American Republican. I guarantee it. That's how sick he is.
You'll not find a Marlowe familiar in this bunch, son. They keep no hearse at their beds - just orange dildoes.Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ He starts with the murky business of the Dutch Church Libel. This doggerel attack on immigrant workers, pinned to the wall of a London cemetery on 5 May 1593, which is laced with allusions to Marlowe’s works and signed ‘per Tamburlaine’, is so badly written that it isn’t obvious whether it was intended as a genuine piece of xenophobic abuse, a simulated piece of xenophobic abuse designed to implicate Marlowe as a xenophobic abuser, or a satire on Marlowe and on xenophobic abuse.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v48/n04 ... nd-thunder
I know, right?
It's not about Marlowe..Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ You'll not find a Marlowe familiar in this bunch, son. They keep no hearse at their beds - just orange dildoes.
MAGA DILDOS, LUSH RIMJOB!
Oh, I understood the MESSAGE. I mock and scorn it, but I UNDERSTOOD it.Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ It's not about Marlowe..
It's the idea that Xenophobia's distinguishing characteristics (and character) remain unchanged over the centuries...
Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, I understood the MESSAGE. I mock and scorn it, but I UNDERSTOOD it.
It was the medium, you see. You are dealing with unwashed apes. Among them, the names Marlowe and Tamburlaine are utterly foreign.
THAT SAID, there is a reason that themes endure, son. And just note that the critiques of those themes are likewise unchanged and are likewise subject to the terms shopworn and hackneyed.
How can Criticism of Stupid evolve if Stupid doesn't?and are likewise subject to the terms shopworn and hackneyed.
When you are blaming stupid for your own unoriginality, you have succumbed to the equally shopworn, "If ya can't beat em, join em" bromide.Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ How can Criticism of Stupid evolve if Stupid doesn't?
You're convinced that your "pox on both houses" standy thing raises you above the fray...Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ When you are blaming stupid for your own unoriginality, you have succumbed to the equally shopworn, "If ya can't beat em, join em" bromide.
I just remember the story of some battle around that time and a Total Eclipse happened.Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ He starts with the murky business of the Dutch Church Libel. This doggerel attack on immigrant workers, pinned to the wall of a London cemetery on 5 May 1593, which is laced with allusions to Marlowe’s works and signed ‘per Tamburlaine’, is so badly written that it isn’t obvious whether it was intended as a genuine piece of xenophobic abuse, a simulated piece of xenophobic abuse designed to implicate Marlowe as a xenophobic abuser, or a satire on Marlowe and on xenophobic abuse.
no spam
I know, right?
I am convinced of no such thing. I am often at a complete loss for an explanation of events. I simply do not allow partisanship to guide me.Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ You're convinced that your "pox on both houses" standy thing raises you above the fray...
I have never made any bones that they do - by your lights.Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ But I suspect that your sympathies lie with Stupid.
"Partisanship"?Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ I am convinced of no such thing. I am often at a complete loss for an explanation of events. I simply do not allow partisanship to guide me.
Think of me a s a contrarian, if you like. It's certainly how I think of me - contrarian, iconoclast, asshole in all companies. I am outcast - a prophet only in my own home.The anti-messiah. I have come into the world to save my breath.
I have never made any bones that they do - by your lights.
But you think men can be pregnant and your daughter's public showers are a proper venue for the cocks of sexually deranged men.
Spam dependence and eager credulity aren't qualities much associated with Contrarians.Think of me a s a contrarian, if you like. It's certainly how I think of me - contrarian, iconoclast, asshole in all companies. I am outcast - a prophet only in my own home.The anti-messiah. I have come into the world to save my breath.
I may be harsh, but even you must acknowledge that I'm fair.I have never made any bones that they do - by your lights.
Speaking of you not knowing, check this out:Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ He starts with the murky business of the Dutch Church Libel. This doggerel attack on immigrant workers, pinned to the wall of a London cemetery on 5 May 1593, which is laced with allusions to Marlowe’s works and signed ‘per Tamburlaine’, is so badly written that it isn’t obvious whether it was intended as a genuine piece of xenophobic abuse, a simulated piece of xenophobic abuse designed to implicate Marlowe as a xenophobic abuser, or a satire on Marlowe and on xenophobic abuse.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v48/n04 ... nd-thunder
I know, right?
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
I acknowledge that you're an idiot. You don't know the difference between a man and a woman.Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ "Partisanship"?
I'm anti-Stupid..
Spam dependence and eager credulity aren't qualities much associated with Contrarians.
I may be harsh, but even you must acknowledge that I'm fair.
Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ I acknowledge that you're an idiot. You don't know the difference between a man and a woman.
You are the walking definition of a partisan asswipe.
You will literally allow your party to bitch-play your *** out of basic word definitions.