You've traced your family back that far?Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ It's not about Marlowe..
It's the idea that Xenophobia's distinguishing characteristics (and character) remain unchanged over the centuries...
Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ You'll not find a Marlowe familiar in this bunch, son. They keep no hearse at their beds - just orange dildoes.
MAGA DILDOS, LUSH RIMJOB!
Those are cigarette brands, right?Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑
It was the medium, you see. You are dealing with unwashed apes. Among them, the names Marlowe and Tamburlaine are utterly foreign.
Finished it for ya, wee monkey.
You should have your Rampant Heterosexual Envy looked at.Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ I acknowledge that you're an idiot. You don't know the difference between a man and a woman.
You are the walking definition of a partisan asswipe.
You will literally allow your party to bitch-play your *** out of basic word definitions.
You have it backwards.RebelGator » 04 Mar 2026, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Those are cigarette brands, right?
I believe the English refer to them as ***.
You should have your Flaccidity Compensation Syndrome treated, tiny feet.Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ You should have your Rampant Heterosexual Envy looked at.
The best way to test BV's unconditional love for all people from all primitive cultures would be to buy up every single house and apartment building that surrounds HIS home and move in 100s of Haitians and Sub Saharan Africans.Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ He starts with the murky business of the Dutch Church Libel. This doggerel attack on immigrant workers, pinned to the wall of a London cemetery on 5 May 1593, which is laced with allusions to Marlowe’s works and signed ‘per Tamburlaine’, is so badly written that it isn’t obvious whether it was intended as a genuine piece of xenophobic abuse, a simulated piece of xenophobic abuse designed to implicate Marlowe as a xenophobic abuser, or a satire on Marlowe and on xenophobic abuse.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v48/n04 ... nd-thunder
I know, right?
Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ What are Texas Republicans talking about in those sparsely populated areas? Jobs? Taxes? Trade wars destroying farmers’ export markets?
No, their big issue of late has been the fact that a group of Muslims in the Dallas suburbs wants to build a planned community with a mosque in the middle of it instead of a golf course. Mr. Paxton has used the powers of his office to wage war against what critics call planned “sharia compounds” in a state where Muslims make up 2 percent of the population at most. In a state with a cooling economy, stagnant job growth and a slowing housing market, it is not clear that this kind of boutique social-war agenda is going to be enough to carry the day.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/04/opin ... imary.html
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ You should have your Flaccidity Compensation Syndrome treated, tiny feet.
Speaking of you being contraindictated, check this out:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Paternity is never established except by Maury Povich,child.
Other than demanding privileges of membership, what do you do to advance the Western Cultural.Tradition?*GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Mar 2026, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ The best way to test BV's unconditional love for all people from all primitive cultures would be to buy up every single house and apartment building that surrounds HIS home and move in 100s of Haitians and Sub Saharan Africans.
The normal men here know exactly how that little test of BV's unwavering love for humanity would end.....huh...?
Yep..BV would happily sell his property at a huge loss and breathe a huge sigh of relief from his very bad case of Nig Fatigue.
If you believe that anything is established by your hysteria.Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ Paternity is never established except by Maury Povich,child.
The only thing we know for CERTAIN about the woman you say is your daughter is that she wears your knife between her shoulder blades.
Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ If you believe that anything is established by your hysteria.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Neither by mine, nor by yours, fruity pebbles.Blackvegetable » 04 Mar 2026, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ If you believe that anything is established by your hysteria.
Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2026, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Neither by mine, nor by yours, fruity pebbles.
You don't even know which end of the dick has a woman attached. I would never take your word that the child you paid all those support checks for is yours, ya cucky ****.
Speaking of you crying, check this out:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
After little more than 3 days of playing, @Deezer Shoove had enough, cried "Stalking".....and followed up with a suspension.