Legacy!
By Blackvegetable
5 Mar 2026 5:41 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
5 Mar 2026 5:41 am
‘I did not vote for this’: Thousands of public comments slam Trump’s ballroom
A Post analysis of submitted comments found more than 97 percent were critical of the planned 90,000-square-foot addition. The White House has defended it as necessary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -comments/
A Post analysis of submitted comments found more than 97 percent were critical of the planned 90,000-square-foot addition. The White House has defended it as necessary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -comments/
5 Mar 2026 5:45 am
5 Mar 2026 5:50 am
You elected to stay in character on the world stage, cradle to grave, come hell or high water you weren't ever going to admit how you exist equally inhabiting time now.Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ ‘I did not vote for this’: Thousands of public comments slam Trump’s ballroom
A Post analysis of submitted comments found more than 97 percent were critical of the planned 90,000-square-foot addition. The White House has defended it as necessary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -comments/
that is your self fulfilling legacy going forward every post you make.
5 Mar 2026 10:29 am
#**** #giveitarestBlackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ ‘I did not vote for this’: Thousands of public comments slam Trump’s ballroom
A Post analysis of submitted comments found more than 97 percent were critical of the planned 90,000-square-foot addition. The White House has defended it as necessary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -comments/
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
5 Mar 2026 12:43 pm
Aren't you one of the assholes speaking up in defense of this?
5 Mar 2026 1:17 pm
Speaking of you hiding again, check this out:Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Aren't you one of the assholes speaking up in defense of this?
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Mar 2026 4:27 pm
Action and reaction works in conjunction with equal retaliation, responses, resisting accepting life in plain sight by all sides of reality defending ideas life exceeds time self evidently alive in series parallel time evolving one at a time proportionately alive as specifically genetically here, now.Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Aren't you one of the assholes speaking up in defense of this?
5 Mar 2026 5:05 pm
Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ ‘I did not vote for this’: Thousands of public comments slam Trump’s ballroom
A Post analysis of submitted comments found more than 97 percent were critical of the planned 90,000-square-foot addition. The White House has defended it as necessary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -comments/
5 Mar 2026 5:45 pm
5 Mar 2026 7:27 pm
Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Aren't you one of the assholes speaking up in defense of this?
Search Assist
The construction of Trump's new White House ballroom is being funded entirely by private donations, meaning it will not cost U.S. taxpayers anything. The estimated cost of the project is around $300 million.
5 Mar 2026 7:33 pm
Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ ‘I did not vote for this’: Thousands of public comments slam Trump’s ballroom
A Post analysis of submitted comments found more than 97 percent were critical of the planned 90,000-square-foot addition. The White House has defended it as necessary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -comments/
You made room for trumps balls in your mouth, depriving your mother.
5 Mar 2026 7:37 pm
*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Mar 2026, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Search Assist
The construction of Trump's new White House ballroom is being funded entirely by private donations, meaning it will not cost U.S. taxpayers anything. The estimated cost of the project is around $300 million.
The estimated cost of the project is around $300 million.
:rofl:
Initially announced at a cost of $200 million, the estimate was raised to $300 million in October 2025 and $400 million in December.
5 Mar 2026 8:00 pm
Search AssistBlackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑
Initially announced at a cost of $200 million, the estimate was raised to $300 million in October 2025 and $400 million in December.
The construction of Trump's new White House ballroom is being funded entirely by private donations, meaning it will not cost U.S. taxpayers anything.
6 Mar 2026 1:09 am
for something privately funded? WaPo needs a wider net….Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Aren't you one of the assholes speaking up in defense of this?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
6 Mar 2026 1:12 am
By the end of October 2025, approximately $350 million had been raised for the White House ballroom project. The initial cost estimate was raised from $200 million to $300 million and then to $400 million later on.Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2026, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑
Initially announced at a cost of $200 million, the estimate was raised to $300 million in October 2025 and $400 million in December.
Wikipediait’s March 2025…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
6 Mar 2026 6:36 am
BallroomBoi,
Stop running..
Did you enthusiastically support Grifty's ballroom dreams?
6 Mar 2026 6:37 am
Is the dirt private?
You're a **** idiot.
6 Mar 2026 6:40 am
Another of the many avenues of grift..*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Mar 2026, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Search Assist
The construction of Trump's new White House ballroom is being funded entirely by private donations, meaning it will not cost U.S. taxpayers anything. The estimated cost of the project is around $300 million.
6 Mar 2026 6:44 am
these dumb mother **** don't understand the US Government is losing money on this Ballroom
The project is funded by donations to the nonprofit "Trust for the National Mall". Experts note that because these are tax-deductible donations, the government could lose between $63 million and $140 million in potential tax revenue (depending on whether the donors are corporations or individuals), acting as an indirect subsidy.
yeah you 
--->Read me : ) Send me your address. You been dodging me boy.
Yer…. Entertaining and I make you
. Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it. You are Persistent, do better. Remember that.
Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??
--->Read me : ) Send me your address. You been dodging me boy.Yer…. Entertaining and I make you
. Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it. You are Persistent, do better. Remember that.Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??
7 Mar 2026 8:21 am
brown, no skirting…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." Who is online
In total there are 24247 users online :: 10 registered, 18 bots, and 24219 guests
Registered users: *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, Lisa 558, Deezer Shoove, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: NING, Not, CensysInspect, DuckDuckBot, okhttp, Bolt, LCC, ADmantX, proximic, CriteoBot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, Baiduspider, Googlebot, YandexBot, bingbot