You elected to stay in character on the world stage, cradle to grave, come hell or high water you weren't ever going to admit how you exist equally inhabiting time now.Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ‘I did not vote for this’: Thousands of public comments slam Trump’s ballroom
A Post analysis of submitted comments found more than 97 percent were critical of the planned 90,000-square-foot addition. The White House has defended it as necessary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -comments/
#**** #giveitarestBlackvegetable » Today, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ ‘I did not vote for this’: Thousands of public comments slam Trump’s ballroom
A Post analysis of submitted comments found more than 97 percent were critical of the planned 90,000-square-foot addition. The White House has defended it as necessary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -comments/
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Aren't you one of the assholes speaking up in defense of this?
Speaking of you hiding again, check this out:Blackvegetable » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Aren't you one of the assholes speaking up in defense of this?
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Action and reaction works in conjunction with equal retaliation, responses, resisting accepting life in plain sight by all sides of reality defending ideas life exceeds time self evidently alive in series parallel time evolving one at a time proportionately alive as specifically genetically here, now.Blackvegetable » Today, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Aren't you one of the assholes speaking up in defense of this?
Blackvegetable » Today, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ ‘I did not vote for this’: Thousands of public comments slam Trump’s ballroom
A Post analysis of submitted comments found more than 97 percent were critical of the planned 90,000-square-foot addition. The White House has defended it as necessary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -comments/


Blackvegetable » Today, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Aren't you one of the assholes speaking up in defense of this?
Blackvegetable » Today, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ ‘I did not vote for this’: Thousands of public comments slam Trump’s ballroom
A Post analysis of submitted comments found more than 97 percent were critical of the planned 90,000-square-foot addition. The White House has defended it as necessary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -comments/
*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Search Assist
The construction of Trump's new White House ballroom is being funded entirely by private donations, meaning it will not cost U.S. taxpayers anything. The estimated cost of the project is around $300 million.
The estimated cost of the project is around $300 million.
Search AssistBlackvegetable » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑![]()
Initially announced at a cost of $200 million, the estimate was raised to $300 million in October 2025 and $400 million in December.
for something privately funded? WaPo needs a wider net….Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Aren't you one of the assholes speaking up in defense of this?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom By the end of October 2025, approximately $350 million had been raised for the White House ballroom project. The initial cost estimate was raised from $200 million to $300 million and then to $400 million later on.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
Initially announced at a cost of $200 million, the estimate was raised to $300 million in October 2025 and $400 million in December.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom BallroomBoi,
Is the dirt private?
Another of the many avenues of grift..*GHETTOBLASTER » Yesterday, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Search Assist
The construction of Trump's new White House ballroom is being funded entirely by private donations, meaning it will not cost U.S. taxpayers anything. The estimated cost of the project is around $300 million.
these dumb mother **** don't understand the US Government is losing money on this Ballroom
brown, no skirting…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom