When you put Rubio in a Sec State, what do you expect? Then add in Kushner and Witcoff as your "experts" to negotiate in the ME, and you are doomed. Kushner would be flipping burgers if his daddy was not rich and he married Trump's daughter.
LowIQTrash » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Kushner was so incompetent he FAILED to manage his "silver spoon up his ***" hand-me-down real estate bidness properly
![]()
![]()
He's giving you the Behind Closed Doors stuff.DeezerShoove » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You got any good news for a change?
Not snark... Actual good news.
Ok. Do it.
So you think Zero Hedge might be on [[[ADOLPH GREENBLATT's]]] radar...?LowIQTrash » Today, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Whenever IzrAeL is being bombarded with missiles, the comments section reverts to "antisemitism" being upvoted with an overwhelmingly high ratio of UV to DV (8:1 standard)
The moment Tel Aviv catches some reprieve from Iranian ballistics, the downvotes begin and you see accounts with <2 yr history and 200 comments begin defending the THFCs.
Taxpayer dollars at work!
DeezerShoove » Today, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok. Do it. Join in...
You never say much of anything but you brought this dinosaur back to life.
Defend The Most Transparent Administration in History.
--- These lefties say this:
According to a report by the Center for Progressive Reform, the Obama Administration held over 1,000 meetings with lobbyists behind closed doors, with 65% representing industry interests, which critics argue politicized the regulatory process. The administration changed 76% of regulations under review, often prioritizing political considerations over agency expertise.
---You?
Can I butter your muffin?LowIQTrash » Today, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Whenever IzrAeL is being bombarded with missiles, the comments section reverts to "antisemitism" being upvoted with an overwhelmingly high ratio of UV to DV (8:1 standard)
The moment Tel Aviv catches some reprieve from Iranian ballistics, the downvotes begin and you see accounts with <2 yr history and 200 comments begin defending the THFCs.
Taxpayer dollars at work!
Which administration do you consider more transparent?DeezerShoove » Today, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok. Do it. Join in...
You never say much of anything but you brought this dinosaur back to life.
Defend The Most Transparent Administration in History.
--- These lefties say this:
According to a report by the Center for Progressive Reform, the Obama Administration held over 1,000 meetings with lobbyists behind closed doors, with 65% representing industry interests, which critics argue politicized the regulatory process. The administration changed 76% of regulations under review, often prioritizing political considerations over agency expertise.
---You?
Iran seems to be holding up.DeezerShoove » Today, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ You got any good news for a change?
Not snark... Actual good news.
Cannonpointer » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Iran seems to be holding up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zId1a4O_iuA
Blackvegetable » Today, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Which administration do you consider more transparent?
If you can't name one, #8 wins.
The commentator said yesterday "Ken Paxton has baggage, but we have to support himDeezerShoove » Yesterday, 10:30 pm » wrote: ↑ That deflection to others is a great defense.
It's the ol' "everybody does it" defense.
Next time I use it try to remember it's in your toolbox too.
Still soliciting, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. you are such a sad sack excuse of a homo sapiens equally alive daily here. All that hope, faith, charity your mind spews about being greater than any brain alive.
He specklates conclusions from the facts he presents, but the facts he presents are pretty edifying.DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 10:28 pm » wrote: ↑ He speculates quite a bit. He could be right, but there is that.
Cannonpointer » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He specklates conclusions from the facts he presents, but the facts he presents are pretty edifying.
Like the fact that no boots on the ground = no regime change...
Or the fact that fatass children **** around in the skraight of hormuz will **** with gas prices bigly.
must be in-conference or he snuck out the window… #runnerDeezerShoove » Yesterday, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable still working on that scathing reply.
4+ hours... must be those closed doors.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom US Navy is charging for that service - adding to fuel costs. Insurers are still reluctant and gouging. The cost of shippingis one of the costs of oil, son.Beekeeper » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Well, the FACT IS, oil prices did NOT take a huge leap, the US Navy has eliminated near totally, the Iranian "navy", and they US NAVY is escorting ships through the Straits of Hormuz.
US officials say over 30 Iranian ships destroyed in Operation Epic Fury strikes | Fox News
So all those "conclusions" you seem to think are "real" happen to be TOTAL **** again!!
