MR-7 » 09 Mar 2026, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Iran is publicly ridiculing U.S. and Israeli strikes, calling them “Operation Epic Mistake” and warning that “many surprises” are coming.
Really? How did that "Death to America" work out for you ****?
On over by the GrandVegas » 09 Mar 2026, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ You bet. I would love to meet you. Come on down to my beloved city where sin is 24 hrs and corruption never rests.![]()
![]()
Then take out the controls / command center / codes that render them useless…Vegas » 09 Mar 2026, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Apparently, Iran's missile bases are all over the desert strategically placed. We know where some are, but they spent 20 yrs manufacturing missiles that it would be impossible to destroy all of them.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Vegas » 09 Mar 2026, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Apparently, Iran's missile bases are all over the desert strategically placed. We know where some are, but they spent 20 yrs manufacturing missiles that it would be impossible to destroy all of them.
I thought the war was going to go on until September yesterday? Today it is "Complete"..Beekeeper » 10 Mar 2026, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑ OBVIOUSLY you have NO CLUE what the **** you are blathering about.
Iran no longer has the capability to launch more than a handful of their missiles BECAUSE our TECHNOLOGY and WEAPONS have eliminated their launch sites. What you DON'T seem to realize is that SPACE FORCE now has satellites that can IMMEDIATELY DETECT a launched missile, send those coordinates to the AIr Force/NAVY and they targe them within minutes. WELL before they have a chance to move it around.
Your entire diatribe is ****, *******!!
Don't be so sure. The US has a finite supply of missiles. They're extremely expensive. And there's an angry line of people who have already paid for some that are still waiting for delivery.ROG62 » 09 Mar 2026, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Warfare has changed dramatically since Iraq…one really can’t compare Iraq and Afghanistan…
They’ll continue to bombard until all military, leadership, nuke, munitions, aircraft and missile launch sites are off the map…the missiles could be an issue depending on where they are and how much military is left to keep mobile…
And many of those missiles are faster than any of our interceptors.Vegas » 09 Mar 2026, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Apparently, Iran's missile bases are all over the desert strategically placed. We know where some are, but they spent 20 yrs manufacturing missiles that it would be impossible to destroy all of them.
Thank you for not revealing more. You likely saved some lives.Vegas » 09 Mar 2026, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It's just the info I get from my people on the ground. Their identity is undercover. They don't they exist. They are phantoms. For your safety, I cannot say any more than that.
Also, I was reading public articles about it.
Son, you are describing the USA.MR-7 » 09 Mar 2026, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑Iran has no plans, just like they have no leader. You’re giving Iran more power than it actually has. Their whole strategy is built around deterrence, not “winning a long war.”
It is the US which relies on deterrence and is not ready for a long war.Vegas » 09 Mar 2026, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Everything you said about Iran applied to North Vietnam during the Vietnam war. We were there fighting for over 10 years. We won almost every battle. However, we called it quits because though we were winning the battles, we weren't winning the war. Consequently, North Vietnam won.
Oh, you didn't know?MR-7 » 09 Mar 2026, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Vietnam isn’t a code for understanding every conflict. North Vietnam had two things Iran doesn’t: a superpower pumping in unlimited weapons and money, and a population willing to absorb catastrophic losses for decades. Iran has neither.
The U.S. didn’t leave Vietnam because Hanoi “out‑strategized” us, we left because it was a guerrilla war in someone else’s backyard with no strategic payoff. Iran isn’t a jungle insurgency. It’s a state with fixed infrastructure, mapped bases, limited industry, and an economy that collapses the moment a real war starts.
Trying to compare Iran to North Vietnam is like comparing a regional power with a fragile economy to a nation backed by the Soviet Union and China at the height of the Cold War. It just doesn’t translate.
JohnnyYou » 10 Mar 2026, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑ I thought the war was going to go on until September yesterday? Today it is "Complete"..
What a complete disaster and melt down. 150 Iranian school kids are dead from our Tomahahks
Those "protestors" were armed mossad assets shooting at cops.Vegas » 09 Mar 2026, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Good points. Very true. My point is that we shouldn't underestimate any country that is willing to drag out a war at any costs if means victory for them. They are concerned about their regime staying in power (though their top leaders are dead, their Islamic ideology is still alive and well) than they do about protecting their population. They shot and killed approximately 7k + protestors. Their civilians are expendable in their eyes. So, they are willing to take losses from their own people. They have a navy and a fragile AirForce. However, their strength comes from their missiles. They already go several missiles through Israel's Iron dome and was able to kill some of our serviceman. Like I said in the OP. They don't need every missile to land. They just need a handful of the hundreds they shoot over to hit their target.
Cannonpointer » 10 Mar 2026, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, you didn't know?
Iran is getting assistance from Russia and likely from China.
Settle in, son. This isn't Grenada Redux.
The clock is still running, ****.MR-7 » 09 Mar 2026, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Iran is publicly ridiculing U.S. and Israeli strikes, calling them “Operation Epic Mistake” and warning that “many surprises” are coming.
Really? How did that "Death to America" work out for you ****?