Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2026, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Whistleblower: Ex-DOGE worker says he took Social Security data to new job
The Social Security inspector general’s office is investigating allegations that the former DOGE engineer took sensitive data on a thumb drive in a major potential security breach, said people familiar with the process.
https://wapo.st/4bAFCQZ
So **** g'ddammned stupid
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2026, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ The Pentagon spent millions of dollars on luxury crabs and other food items in a single month as part of a frantic end-of-year spending spree to maintain its immense funding.
An analysis by the government watchdog Open the Books found that the department led by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth spent more than $93 billion in September 2025, the end of the fiscal year, on various grants and contracts, the highest total since at least 2008.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/pentagon- ... ng-frenzy/
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Vegas » 11 Mar 2026, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

What the hell does this have to do with me?
You sure are jigaboo.
Let the sun shine on the CorruptionBlackvegetable » 11 Mar 2026, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ The Pentagon spent millions of dollars on luxury crabs and other food items in a single month as part of a frantic end-of-year spending spree to maintain its immense funding.
An analysis by the government watchdog Open the Books found that the department led by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth spent more than $93 billion in September 2025, the end of the fiscal year, on various grants and contracts, the highest total since at least 2008.
no spam
Dumb as ****.
Your so vain. You probably think this post is about you.. Don'tchaVegas » 11 Mar 2026, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ What the hell does this have to do with me?
Hey, I wonder how many times you will be copying members today. We love you providing evidence that you have zero thoughts of your own.
JohnnyYou » 11 Mar 2026, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Your so vain. You probably think this post is about you.. Don'tcha
You sure are you sorry pedo traitor bastard!
How many billions of dollars has this guy handed to Somali Fraudsters so far...?Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2026, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Whistleblower: Ex-DOGE worker says he took Social Security data to new job
The Social Security inspector general’s office is investigating allegations that the former DOGE engineer took sensitive data on a thumb drive in a major potential security breach, said people familiar with the process.
https://wapo.st/4bAFCQZ
So **** g'ddammned stupid
^^^^^^^^......4:22 PM responds to 4:20 PM.......

Show me the video of Somalis stealing billions...*GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Mar 2026, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑ How many billions of dollars has this guy handed to Somali Fraudsters so far...?
Unlike your make believe photo of "Gay Trump" that no [[[MSM]]] outlets would touch with a 10 foot pole. the [[[MSM]]] IS running stories about Somalian fraud.