Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The Essence of MAGA
The Essence of MAGA
By Blackvegetable
Yesterday 7:46 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Yesterday 7:46 am
When we mentioned yesterday that Trump was blaming Iran for firing the Tomahawk missile that destroyed an Iranian girl’s school on February 28, we suggested he’d probably (or hopefully) have been briefed otherwise and was merely lying. Now we’re not so sure. Asked at his presser yesterday why he was the only member of own administration accusing Iran of the strike, Trump replied: “Because I just don’t know enough about it.”
https://www.thebulwark.com/p/tacos-with ... ran-attack
What's not to loathe?
https://www.thebulwark.com/p/tacos-with ... ran-attack
What's not to loathe?
Yesterday 7:59 am
Now Trump will continue to unleash violence and destruction for a while. And he’ll continue to threaten, as he did last night on Truth Social: “If Iran does anything that stops the flow of Oil within the Strait of Hormuz, they will be hit by the United States of America TWENTY TIMES HARDER than they have been hit thus far. Additionally, we will take out easily destroyable targets that will make it virtually impossible for Iran to ever be built back, as a Nation, again—Death, Fire, and Fury will reign [sic] upon them.” But this protesting-too-much bluster was followed by the TACO tipoff sentence: “But I hope, and pray, that it does not happen!”
ibid.
20X?
With what, you **** idiot?
ibid.
20X?
With what, you **** idiot?
JuCoPOTUS...Death, Fire, and Fury will reign [sic] upon them.”
Yesterday 9:25 am
Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » Today, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ When we mentioned yesterday that Trump was blaming Iran for firing the Tomahawk missile that destroyed an Iranian girl’s school on February 28, we suggested he’d probably (or hopefully) have been briefed otherwise and was merely lying. Now we’re not so sure. Asked at his presser yesterday why he was the only member of own administration accusing Iran of the strike, Trump replied: “Because I just don’t know enough about it.”
https://www.thebulwark.com/p/tacos-with ... ran-attack
What's not to loathe?
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Yesterday 10:01 am
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ When we mentioned yesterday that Trump was blaming Iran for firing the Tomahawk missile that destroyed an Iranian girl’s school on February 28, we suggested he’d probably (or hopefully) have been briefed otherwise and was merely lying. Now we’re not so sure. Asked at his presser yesterday why he was the only member of own administration accusing Iran of the strike, Trump replied: “Because I just don’t know enough about it.”
https://www.thebulwark.com/p/tacos-with ... ran-attack
What's not to loathe?
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Yesterday 10:06 am
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Yesterday 10:06 am
Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » Today, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑ Now Trump will continue to unleash violence and destruction for a while. And he’ll continue to threaten, as he did last night on Truth Social: “If Iran does anything that stops the flow of Oil within the Strait of Hormuz, they will be hit by the United States of America TWENTY TIMES HARDER than they have been hit thus far. Additionally, we will take out easily destroyable targets that will make it virtually impossible for Iran to ever be built back, as a Nation, again—Death, Fire, and Fury will reign [sic] upon them.” But this protesting-too-much bluster was followed by the TACO tipoff sentence: “But I hope, and pray, that it does not happen!”
ibid.
20X?
With what, you **** idiot?
JuCoPOTUS...
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Yesterday 10:11 am
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ When we mentioned yesterday that Trump was blaming Iran for firing the Tomahawk missile that destroyed an Iranian girl’s school on February 28, we suggested he’d probably (or hopefully) have been briefed otherwise and was merely lying. Now we’re not so sure. Asked at his presser yesterday why he was the only member of own administration accusing Iran of the strike, Trump replied: “Because I just don’t know enough about it.”
https://www.thebulwark.com/p/tacos-with ... ran-attack
What's not to loathe?
Let's talk some FACTS here, DICKSUCKER!!
The ONLY "evidence" that a school got hit from a Tomahawk was from IRANIAN PROPAGANDA!! PERIOD!!
And here are some very inconvenient FACTS you need to FACE UP TO!!
A Tomahawk missile ON IMPACT is traveling nearly the speed of sound. IN ORDER TO CAPTURE A PERFECT IMAGE WITHOUT MOTION BLUR is to have a SHUTTER SPEED OF OVER 10,000th of a SECOND. ONLY HIGH SPEEDS CAMERAS ARE CAPABLE OF DOING THAT, and you're going to believe that the IRANIANS HAPPENED TO HAVE ONE SET UP, POINTED AT THAT SCHOOL THE VERY INSTANT A TOMAHAWK ARRIVED????
Now you're going to tell me that an image that is PERFECT in every way, with no image blur and at the instant it was set to strike this so called "school" is REAL???
IF you believe that, you are WITHOUT A DOUBT, the DUMBEST **** IDIOT THAT EVER SUCKED AIR!!
CASE CLOSED!! PERIOD!!!
YOU LOSE, DICKSUCKER!! YOU ALWAYS DO AND ALWAYS WILL!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
Yesterday 10:12 am
I didn't see a single link...Beekeeper » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Let's talk some FACTS here, DICKSUCKER!!
The ONLY "evidence" that a
Yesterday 10:14 am
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ When we mentioned yesterday that Trump was blaming Iran for firing the Tomahawk missile that destroyed an Iranian girl’s school on February 28, we suggested he’d probably (or hopefully) have been briefed otherwise and was merely lying. Now we’re not so sure. Asked at his presser yesterday why he was the only member of own administration accusing Iran of the strike, Trump replied: “Because I just don’t know enough about it.”
https://www.thebulwark.com/p/tacos-with ... ran-attack
What's not to loathe?
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Yesterday 10:15 am
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Yesterday 10:16 am
Here are a few OP links for you:
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Yesterday 10:26 am
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ When we mentioned yesterday that Trump was blaming Iran for firing the Tomahawk missile that destroyed an Iranian girl’s school on February 28, we suggested he’d probably (or hopefully) have been briefed otherwise and was merely lying. Now we’re not so sure. Asked at his presser yesterday why he was the only member of own administration accusing Iran of the strike, Trump replied: “Because I just don’t know enough about it.”
no spam
What's not to loathe?
h]DEL HERE TO REMOVE CP CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES[ttps://i.postimg.cc/q7B8JRvJ/Trump-knows-nothing.png
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
Yesterday 10:28 am
Vegas » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Here are a few OP links for you:
Cry to Deezer.
no spam
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
no spam
no spam
THE YEAST INFECTION IS GOING TO KILL YOUR INNER TROLL.
GET CHECKED FOR TRUMP DEMENTIA SYNDROME VEGASNA..
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
Yesterday 11:00 am
You don't need a SINGLE LINK, ASSHOLE!!!
Those FACTS are indisputable, regardless of whatever **** "link" you might want.
IF you want a LINK, try GOOGLE!!
FACTS>>>>
To capture a Tomahawk missile at impact—which travels at subsonic speeds, around 577 mph or roughly 850 feet per second—a shutter speed between 1/1,000,000 and 1/333,333 of a second (1–3 microseconds) is required to completely avoid motion blur.
- For High-Speed Imaging: A high-speed camera capable of over 300,000+ frames per second is ideal for capturing this type of action, as often seen in military-grade recordings.
- For Still Cameras: While 1/2000s to 1/4000s is generally used for fast-moving objects, a missile at terminal velocity will likely require higher speeds or, more likely, will appear with slight motion blur even with fast, specialized equipment.
- Critical Considerations: A "global shutter" is required to prevent the skewing effect common on digital cameras when shooting fast objects.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
Yesterday 11:02 am
not wasting time.
Yesterday 11:32 am
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ When we mentioned yesterday that Trump was blaming Iran for firing the Tomahawk missile that destroyed an Iranian girl’s school on February 28, we suggested he’d probably (or hopefully) have been briefed otherwise and was merely lying. Now we’re not so sure. Asked at his presser yesterday why he was the only member of own administration accusing Iran of the strike, Trump replied: “Because I just don’t know enough about it.”
https://www.thebulwark.com/p/tacos-with ... ran-attack
What's not to loathe?
https://youtu.be/F2RnxZnubCM?si=oXjc9oqlFxOBSiij
Yesterday 11:37 am
#******
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
Yesterday 1:10 pm
Of course not seeing how you GOT THAT *** KICKED AGAIN WITH SOME PHYSICS AND FACTS!!
Something you know NOTHING ABOUT, ASSHOLE!!
Keep sucking on MIGHT explode!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
Yesterday 1:12 pm
Yesterday 1:15 pm
JohnnyYou » Today, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑ h]DEL HERE TO REMOVE CP CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES[ttps://i.postimg.cc/q7B8JRvJ/Trump-knows-nothing.png
Johnny is stoned again, will anyone help him?
I won't, he's an election fraud denier and all-around asshole.
Who is online
In total there are 6877 users online :: 17 registered, 21 bots, and 6839 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, Jantje_Smit, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, murdock, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Baiduspider, Firefox/7.0, LCC, app.hypefactors.com, Bolt, aiohttp, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo! Slurp, SiteLockSpider, CriteoBot, Not, Googlebot, proximic, YandexBot, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, curl/7, GPTBot, bingbot, linkfluence.com