Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Keep Telling Yourselves He Never Said "Drink Bleach."
Keep Telling Yourselves He Never Said "Drink Bleach."
By Blackvegetable
13 Mar 2026 7:48 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
13 Mar 2026 7:48 am
In his post, Trump was particularly angry with The New York Times. His beef with the publication has been brewing for days. Times reporter Shawn McCreesh asked him directly on Tuesday during a White House press briefing who was responsible for the lethal missile strike.
“You just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war,” McCreesh said to Trump.
“But you’re the only person in your government saying this,” he continued. “Even your Defense Secretary wouldn’t say that, when he was asked, standing over your shoulder, on your plane, on Saturday. Why are you the only person saying this?”
Trump replied, “I just don’t know enough about it. I think it’s something that I was told is under investigation.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-tr ... -meltdown/
This is a toxically stupid human being.
“You just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war,” McCreesh said to Trump.
“But you’re the only person in your government saying this,” he continued. “Even your Defense Secretary wouldn’t say that, when he was asked, standing over your shoulder, on your plane, on Saturday. Why are you the only person saying this?”
Trump replied, “I just don’t know enough about it. I think it’s something that I was told is under investigation.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-tr ... -meltdown/
This is a toxically stupid human being.
13 Mar 2026 7:53 am
Keep grasping, do you ever wonder why your arms are flailing like an infant's?Blackvegetable » 13 Mar 2026, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ In his post, Trump was particularly angry with The New York Times. His beef with the publication has been brewing for days. Times reporter Shawn McCreesh asked him directly on Tuesday during a White House press briefing who was responsible for the lethal missile strike.
“You just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war,” McCreesh said to Trump.
“But you’re the only person in your government saying this,” he continued. “Even your Defense Secretary wouldn’t say that, when he was asked, standing over your shoulder, on your plane, on Saturday. Why are you the only person saying this?”
Trump replied, “I just don’t know enough about it. I think it’s something that I was told is under investigation.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-tr ... -meltdown/
This is a toxically stupid human being.
13 Mar 2026 7:59 am
Blackvegetable » 13 Mar 2026, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ In his post, Trump was particularly angry with The New York Times. His beef with the publication has been brewing for days. Times reporter Shawn McCreesh asked him directly on Tuesday during a White House press briefing who was responsible for the lethal missile strike.
“You just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war,” McCreesh said to Trump.
“But you’re the only person in your government saying this,” he continued. “Even your Defense Secretary wouldn’t say that, when he was asked, standing over your shoulder, on your plane, on Saturday. Why are you the only person saying this?”
Trump replied, “I just don’t know enough about it. I think it’s something that I was told is under investigation.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-tr ... -meltdown/
This is a toxically stupid human being.
13 Mar 2026 8:01 am
RebelGator » 13 Mar 2026, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑ Keep grasping, do you ever wonder why your arms are flailing like an infant's?
Are you saying that it doesn't sound stupid to you?
13 Mar 2026 8:08 am
On Monday, he told Republicans at a lawmakers’ retreat in Miami that the war had been “won in many ways.”
“We’ve already won in many ways,” he said, but admitted, “We haven’t won enough. We go forward, more determined than ever to achieve ultimate victory that will end this long-running danger once and for all." He also told CBS News, “I think the war is very complete, pretty much.”
Then on Wednesday in Kentucky, Trump said, “We’ve won, let me tell you, we’ve won. You never like to say too early you won, we won... in the first hour it was over.”
Just minutes later, though, he was suggesting otherwise. “We don’t want to leave early, do we?” he said. “We got to finish the job, right?”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/intellige ... -iran-war/
he must stop talking.
“We’ve already won in many ways,” he said, but admitted, “We haven’t won enough. We go forward, more determined than ever to achieve ultimate victory that will end this long-running danger once and for all." He also told CBS News, “I think the war is very complete, pretty much.”
Then on Wednesday in Kentucky, Trump said, “We’ve won, let me tell you, we’ve won. You never like to say too early you won, we won... in the first hour it was over.”
Just minutes later, though, he was suggesting otherwise. “We don’t want to leave early, do we?” he said. “We got to finish the job, right?”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/intellige ... -iran-war/
he must stop talking.
13 Mar 2026 8:29 am
Top Trump administration officials admitted to lawmakers during classified briefings that they had not planned for the possibility of Iran closing the passage. Multiple Democrats emerged from those meetings expressing shock and outrage at the lack of planning and justification for launching the war.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/leak-expo ... -scenario/
The Sound Dues (Øresundstolden) were a strategic toll levied by the Danish Crown on all foreign ships passing through the Øresund strait. Established in 1429 by King Eric of Pomerania to replace declining revenues from herring fisheries, they remained a cornerstone of Denmark's economy for over 400 years. [1, 2, 3]
How the System Worked
* Enforcement: Ships were required to anchor at Helsingør (Elsinore) to pay the toll. Refusal to stop was met with cannon fire from [Kronborg Castle](https://www.havneguide.dk/en/nordsjaell ... ound-tolls) on the Danish side and the Kärnan fortress in Helsingborg (then also part of Denmark).
* Tax Structure: Initially a flat fee per ship, the toll evolved into an ad valorem tax in 1567, charged as a percentage (typically 1–2%) of the cargo's value.
* The "Buying Rule": To prevent skippers from understating their cargo's value, the Danish Crown reserved the right to purchase the entire cargo at the price the captain declared. [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Economic and Political Impact
* Revenue: At their peak in the 16th and 17th centuries, the dues provided up to two-thirds of Denmark's total state income. This wealth allowed Danish kings to remain largely independent of the local aristocracy and fund a powerful navy.
* Conflict: The tolls were a major source of international friction and a primary cause of several wars, particularly with Sweden and the Netherlands. [1, 9, 10, 11]
Abolition
The dues were abolished on April 1, 1857, following the [Copenhagen Convention](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_Dues). Facing intense international pressure—notably from the United States and Great Britain—Denmark agreed to end the tolls in exchange for a one-time compensation of approximately 33.5 million rigsdaler paid by the world's major trading nations. [1, 12, 13, 14]
https://www.thedailybeast.com/leak-expo ... -scenario/
The Sound Dues (Øresundstolden) were a strategic toll levied by the Danish Crown on all foreign ships passing through the Øresund strait. Established in 1429 by King Eric of Pomerania to replace declining revenues from herring fisheries, they remained a cornerstone of Denmark's economy for over 400 years. [1, 2, 3]
How the System Worked
* Enforcement: Ships were required to anchor at Helsingør (Elsinore) to pay the toll. Refusal to stop was met with cannon fire from [Kronborg Castle](https://www.havneguide.dk/en/nordsjaell ... ound-tolls) on the Danish side and the Kärnan fortress in Helsingborg (then also part of Denmark).
* Tax Structure: Initially a flat fee per ship, the toll evolved into an ad valorem tax in 1567, charged as a percentage (typically 1–2%) of the cargo's value.
* The "Buying Rule": To prevent skippers from understating their cargo's value, the Danish Crown reserved the right to purchase the entire cargo at the price the captain declared. [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Economic and Political Impact
* Revenue: At their peak in the 16th and 17th centuries, the dues provided up to two-thirds of Denmark's total state income. This wealth allowed Danish kings to remain largely independent of the local aristocracy and fund a powerful navy.
* Conflict: The tolls were a major source of international friction and a primary cause of several wars, particularly with Sweden and the Netherlands. [1, 9, 10, 11]
Abolition
The dues were abolished on April 1, 1857, following the [Copenhagen Convention](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_Dues). Facing intense international pressure—notably from the United States and Great Britain—Denmark agreed to end the tolls in exchange for a one-time compensation of approximately 33.5 million rigsdaler paid by the world's major trading nations. [1, 12, 13, 14]
13 Mar 2026 9:17 am
13 Mar 2026 9:27 am
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ In his post, Trump was particularly angry with The New York Times. His beef with the publication has been brewing for days. Times reporter Shawn McCreesh asked him directly on Tuesday during a White House press briefing who was responsible for the lethal missile strike.
“You just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war,” McCreesh said to Trump.
“But you’re the only person in your government saying this,” he continued. “Even your Defense Secretary wouldn’t say that, when he was asked, standing over your shoulder, on your plane, on Saturday. Why are you the only person saying this?”
Trump replied, “I just don’t know enough about it. I think it’s something that I was told is under investigation.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-tr ... -meltdown/
This is a toxically stupid human being.
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
13 Mar 2026 9:34 am
Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » Today, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ Top Trump administration officials admitted to lawmakers during classified briefings that they had not planned for the possibility of Iran closing the passage. Multiple Democrats emerged from those meetings expressing shock and outrage at the lack of planning and justification for launching the war.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/leak-expo ... -scenario/
The Sound Dues (Øresundstolden) were a strategic toll levied by the Danish Crown on all foreign ships passing through the Øresund strait. Established in 1429 by King Eric of Pomerania to replace declining revenues from herring fisheries, they remained a cornerstone of Denmark's economy for over 400 years. [1, 2, 3]
How the System Worked
* Enforcement: Ships were required to anchor at Helsingør (Elsinore) to pay the toll. Refusal to stop was met with cannon fire from [Kronborg Castle](https://www.havneguide.dk/en/nordsjaell ... ound-tolls) on the Danish side and the Kärnan fortress in Helsingborg (then also part of Denmark).
* Tax Structure: Initially a flat fee per ship, the toll evolved into an ad valorem tax in 1567, charged as a percentage (typically 1–2%) of the cargo's value.
* The "Buying Rule": To prevent skippers from understating their cargo's value, the Danish Crown reserved the right to purchase the entire cargo at the price the captain declared. [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Economic and Political Impact
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
13 Mar 2026 9:43 am
ConservativeWave » 13 Mar 2026, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ Trump is NOT "toxic" and NOT "stupid"... WHAT HE IS, at his core he is HONEST, DIRECT, and BRILLIANT !!
NOW, lets talk about the democrat party... Democrats at THEIR CORE are DISHONEST, DELUSIONAL, and STUPID ! ONE case in POINT? Is Alehandro Mayorkas...
Too stupid.
21 Mar 2026 9:00 am
Blackvegetable » 13 Mar 2026, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ Top Trump administration officials admitted to lawmakers during classified briefings that they had not planned for the possibility of Iran closing the passage. Multiple Democrats emerged from those meetings expressing shock and outrage at the lack of planning and justification for launching the war.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/leak-expo ... -scenario/
The Sound Dues (Øresundstolden) were a strategic toll levied by the Danish Crown on all foreign ships passing through the Øresund strait. Established in 1429 by King Eric of Pomerania to replace declining revenues from herring fisheries, they remained a cornerstone of Denmark's economy for over 400 years. [1, 2, 3]
US intelligence was well aware that an attack on Iran would provoke a significant response. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence told Congress in March 2025 that ‘Iran’s large conventional forces are capable of inflicting substantial damage to an attacker, executing regional strikes and disrupting shipping, particularly energy supplies.’ As the US began its military build-up, Iranian leaders made their position clear. In January, Ghalibaf said that ‘in the event of a US military attack, both the occupied territories and US military and shipping centres will be legitimate targets for us.’ On 1 February, Khamenei said that the US ‘must know if it starts a war this time it will be a regional war’. After the war did begin, an Iranian government official told the Financial Times correspondent in Tehran that Iran ‘had no choice but to escalate and start a big fire so everyone would see’.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v48/n05 ... n-week-one
25 Mar 2026 9:53 am
Iran Demands Hormuz Authority, Reparations to End WarBlackvegetable » 13 Mar 2026, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ Top Trump administration officials admitted to lawmakers during classified briefings that they had not planned for the possibility of Iran closing the passage. Multiple Democrats emerged from those meetings expressing shock and outrage at the lack of planning and justification for launching the war.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/leak-expo ... -scenario/
The Sound Dues (Øresundstolden) were a strategic toll levied by the Danish Crown on all foreign ships passing through the Øresund strait. Established in 1429 by King Eric of Pomerania to replace declining revenues from herring fisheries, they remained a cornerstone of Denmark's economy for over 400 years. [1, 2, 3]
How the System Worked
* Enforcement: Ships were required to anchor at Helsingør (Elsinore) to pay the toll. Refusal to stop was met with cannon fire from [Kronborg Castle](https://www.havneguide.dk/en/nordsjaell ... ound-tolls) on the Danish side and the Kärnan fortress in Helsingborg (then also part of Denmark).
* Tax Structure: Initially a flat fee per ship, the toll evolved into an ad valorem tax in 1567, charged as a percentage (typically 1–2%) of the cargo's value.
* The "Buying Rule": To prevent skippers from understating their cargo's value, the Danish Crown reserved the right to purchase the entire cargo at the price the captain declared. [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
Economic and Political Impact
* Revenue: At their peak in the 16th and 17th centuries, the dues provided up to two-thirds of Denmark's total state income. This wealth allowed Danish kings to remain largely independent of the local aristocracy and fund a powerful navy.
* Conflict: The tolls were a major source of international friction and a primary cause of several wars, particularly with Sweden and the Netherlands. [1, 9, 10, 11]
Abolition
The dues were abolished on April 1, 1857, following the [Copenhagen Convention](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_Dues). Facing intense international pressure—notably from the United States and Great Britain—Denmark agreed to end the tolls in exchange for a one-time compensation of approximately 33.5 million rigsdaler paid by the world's major trading nations. [1, 12, 13, 14]
25 Mar 2026 9:55 am
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
25 Mar 2026 9:56 am
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
25 Mar 2026 9:58 am
Iran has set five conditions to end the war, according to Press TV:
This ain't gonna be cheap.
- A complete halt to “aggression and “assassinations” by the enemy.
- The establishment of concrete mechanisms to ensure that the war is not reimposed on the Islamic Republic.
- Guaranteed and clearly defined payment of war damages and reparations.
- The conclusion of the war across all fronts and for all resistance groups involved throughout the region
- International recognition and guarantees regarding Iran’s sovereign right to exercise authority over the Strait of Hormuz.
This ain't gonna be cheap.
25 Mar 2026 10:09 am
Copilot, I can't open the link.Blackvegetable » 13 Mar 2026, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ Top Trump administration officials admitted to lawmakers during classified briefings that they had not planned for the possibility of Iran closing the passage. Multiple Democrats emerged from those meetings expressing shock and outrage at the lack of planning and justification for launching the war.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/leak-expo ... -scenario/
The Slack-Jaw poster BV posted it.BOTTOM LINE (High‑Confidence Summary)
The claim cannot be confirmed or debunked from the provided link because the URL is invalid. However, no major outlet (AP, Reuters, NYT, WaPo, BBC, Al‑Monitor, Politico, CNN, Fox, WSJ) has reported that Trump officials “admitted” they had no plan for Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz. That absence is meaningful — if top officials admitted something that explosive in classified briefings, multiple outlets would have corroborated it.
So, the claim is unverified, unsupported by independent reporting, and likely exaggerated or speculative unless the full article shows otherwise.
The link: …is truncated. Daily Beast URLs never contain “…” — that means the link was copied from a preview or shortened display. It is unsupported and cannot be treated as factual.
Ask Slack-Jaw poster BV to provide the original link.
25 Mar 2026 10:30 am
You've trained your AI to be as **** stupid as you....MR-7 » 25 Mar 2026, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ Copilot, I can't open the link.
BOTTOM LINE (High‑Confidence Summary)
The claim cannot be confirmed or debunked from the provided link because the URL is invalid. However, no major outlet (AP, Reuters, NYT, WaPo, BBC, Al‑Monitor, Politico, CNN, Fox, WSJ) has reported that Trump officials “admitted” they had no plan for Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz. That absence is meaningful — if top officials admitted something that explosive in classified briefings, multiple outlets would have corroborated it.
So, the claim is unverified, unsupported by independent reporting, and likely exaggerated or speculative unless the full article shows otherwise.
The link: …is truncated. Daily Beast URLs never contain “…” — that means the link was copied from a preview or shortened display. It is unsupported and cannot be treated as factual.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/12/politics ... ndroid_app
The Pentagon and National Security Council significantly underestimated Iran’s willingness to close the Strait of Hormuz in response to US military strikes while planning the ongoing operation, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.
25 Mar 2026 10:35 am
Can we label some 190 Proof Grain Alcohol and slip in Hegseth's cabinet? He'll probably mistake it as water and guzzle the whole fifth when he gets asked to resign today.Blackvegetable » 13 Mar 2026, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ In his post, Trump was particularly angry with The New York Times. His beef with the publication has been brewing for days. Times reporter Shawn McCreesh asked him directly on Tuesday during a White House press briefing who was responsible for the lethal missile strike.
“You just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war,” McCreesh said to Trump.
“But you’re the only person in your government saying this,” he continued. “Even your Defense Secretary wouldn’t say that, when he was asked, standing over your shoulder, on your plane, on Saturday. Why are you the only person saying this?”
Trump replied, “I just don’t know enough about it. I think it’s something that I was told is under investigation.”
no spam
This is a toxically stupid human being.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
25 Mar 2026 10:54 am
Really.....what happened to this link? You know, the original one.Blackvegetable » 25 Mar 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ You've trained your AI to be as **** stupid as you....
https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/12/politics ... ndroid_app
The Pentagon and National Security Council significantly underestimated Iran’s willingness to close the Strait of Hormuz in response to US military strikes while planning the ongoing operation, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/leak-expo ... -scenario/
25 Mar 2026 11:06 am
This one?MR-7 » 25 Mar 2026, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ Really.....what happened to this link? You know, the original one.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/leak-expo ... -scenario/
The Pentagon and the National Security Council had completely underestimated how willing Iran would be to shut off the vital shipping lane between Iran and Oman, through which around one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas passes, multiple sources told CNN.
you people are **** morons
Who is online
In total there are 3021 users online :: 16 registered, 16 bots, and 2989 guests
Registered users: Vegas, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, MR-7, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, 31st Arrival, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Kinza, NING, Not, proximic, DuckDuckGo, Baiduspider, CriteoBot, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, YandexBot, linkfluence.com, Applebot, bingbot, GPTBot, curl/7