LOL: Excellent!
By MR-7
Yesterday 8:35 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Yesterday 8:35 am
**** you NATO.....
Trump is doing what they call "hoe checking" and it's about time.
Trump warns NATO faces 'very bad' future if allies do not help secure Strait of Hormuz
Trump is doing what they call "hoe checking" and it's about time.
Trump warns NATO faces 'very bad' future if allies do not help secure Strait of Hormuz
Yesterday 9:08 am
Why is NATO obliged to bail him out of a mess of his own making?MR-7 » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ **** you NATO.....
Trump is doing what they call "hoe checking" and it's about time.
Trump warns NATO faces 'very bad' future if allies do not help secure Strait of Hormuz
Yesterday 9:08 am
The US provides approximately $570 million to $685 million annually directly to NATO’s common-funded budgets (covering administrative, military, and infrastructure costs), representing about 16-22% of that specific budget. However, the US total defense expenditure related to NATO commitments is closer to $900+ billion, representing roughly 62% of all NATO members' combined defense spending
That's right! Time for the rest of NATO to pony up!
That's right! Time for the rest of NATO to pony up!
Yesterday 9:13 am
I told johnny I figured it was a “who’s on our side loyalty” test…MR-7 » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ **** you NATO.....
Trump is doing what they call "hoe checking" and it's about time.
Trump warns NATO faces 'very bad' future if allies do not help secure Strait of Hormuz
here’s an interesting article with a different perspective…
scroll down to ‘The World Weighs in On the New World War’
https://badlands.substack.com/p/badlands-brief-174
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
Yesterday 9:49 am
Oh, they are not. No more than the USA is obliged to protect those countries who don't provide their own "ship protection" in the Strait of Hormuz. They have been called out by TRUMP, and they can deal with it.
Iran says that foreign governments or intelligence services could deploy drones that look like Iranian models, then blame Tehran for the attack. This is part of a broader narrative Iran is pushing as drone warfare becomes more widespread in the region. The claim appears in coverage of Iran’s expanding drone and cyber operations, where Iranian officials argue that:
It would be very interesting to see this happen....
I mean, I am A ok with this not ending well for Iran....
Yesterday 9:52 am
Blackvegetable » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Why is NATO obliged to bail him out of a mess of his own making?
You don't understand much, do you?
Yesterday 9:54 am
You people are **** morons..MR-7 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Oh, they are not. No more than the USA is obliged to protect those countries who don't provide their own "ship protection" in the Strait of Hormuz. They have been called out by TRUMP, and they can deal with it.
Iran says that foreign governments or intelligence services could deploy drones that look like Iranian models, then blame Tehran for the attack. This is part of a broader narrative Iran is pushing as drone warfare becomes more widespread in the region. The claim appears in coverage of Iran’s expanding drone and cyber operations, where Iranian officials argue that:
It would be very interesting to see this happen....
The organization serves as a system of collective security, whereby its independent member states agree to mutual defence in response to an attack by any outside party. This is enshrined in Article 5 of the treaty, which states that an armed attack against one member shall be considered an attack against them all.
Yesterday 9:59 am
I am A ok with this not ending well for Iran̶B̶l̶a̶c̶k̶v̶e̶g̶e̶t̶a̶b̶l̶e̶
̶
̶Y̶o̶u̶ ̶p̶e̶o̶p̶l̶e̶ ̶a̶r̶e̶ ̶f̶u̶c̶k̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶m̶o̶r̶o̶n̶s̶.̶.̶
̶
̶T̶h̶e̶ ̶o̶r̶g̶a̶n̶i̶z̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶s̶e̶r̶v̶e̶s̶ ̶a̶s̶ ̶a̶ ̶s̶y̶s̶t̶e̶m̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶c̶o̶l̶l̶e̶c̶t̶i̶v̶e̶ ̶s̶e̶c̶u̶r̶i̶t̶y̶,̶ ̶w̶h̶e̶r̶e̶b̶y̶ ̶i̶t̶s̶ ̶i̶n̶d̶e̶p̶e̶n̶d̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶m̶e̶m̶b̶e̶r̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶t̶e̶s̶ ̶a̶g̶r̶e̶e̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶m̶u̶t̶u̶a̶l̶ ̶d̶e̶f̶e̶n̶c̶e̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶r̶e̶s̶p̶o̶n̶s̶e̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶a̶n̶ ̶a̶t̶t̶a̶c̶k̶ ̶b̶y̶ ̶a̶n̶y̶ ̶o̶u̶t̶s̶i̶d̶e̶ ̶p̶a̶r̶t̶y̶.̶ ̶T̶h̶i̶s̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶e̶n̶s̶h̶r̶i̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶A̶r̶t̶i̶c̶l̶e̶ ̶5̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶t̶r̶e̶a̶t̶y̶,̶ ̶w̶h̶i̶c̶h̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶t̶e̶s̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶a̶n̶ ̶a̶r̶m̶e̶d̶ ̶a̶t̶t̶a̶c̶k̶ ̶a̶g̶a̶i̶n̶s̶t̶ ̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶m̶e̶m̶b̶e̶r̶ ̶s̶h̶a̶l̶l̶ ̶b̶e̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶s̶i̶d̶e̶r̶e̶d̶ ̶a̶n̶ ̶a̶t̶t̶a̶c̶k̶ ̶a̶g̶a̶i̶n̶s̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶m̶ ̶a̶l̶l̶.̶
̶
Yesterday 10:08 am
LOL: Did NATO ask Trump to help Ukraine?Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The organization serves as a system of collective security, whereby its independent member states agree to mutual defence in response to an attack by any outside party. This is enshrined in Article 5 of the treaty, which states that an armed attack against one member shall be considered an attack against them all.
Yes. NATO explicitly sought Trump’s support. According to NATO’s official statement:
- NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte met President Trump on July 14, 2025, at the White House.
- The purpose was to advance efforts to support Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression.
- Rutte publicly praised Trump’s “pivotal decision” to ensure Ukraine receives essential military resources.
- NATO emphasized that the U.S. role is central, with Europe and Canada coordinating funding and production.
What NATO country was attacked by Russia?
Yesterday 10:17 am
Gee, you think maybe it's because over 20% of the oil shipped by Middle East nations goes to Europe, dickhead?Blackvegetable » Today, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ Why is NATO obliged to bail him out of a mess of his own making?
Yesterday 10:26 am
was Europe the aggressor?MR-7 » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ LOL: Did NATO ask Trump to help Ukraine?
✅ Yes. NATO explicitly sought Trump’s support. According to NATO’s official statement:This is the strongest possible confirmation that NATO leadership directly sought Trump’s involvement.
- NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte met President Trump on July 14, 2025, at the White House.
- The purpose was to advance efforts to support Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression.
- Rutte publicly praised Trump’s “pivotal decision” to ensure Ukraine receives essential military resources.
- NATO emphasized that the U.S. role is central, with Europe and Canada coordinating funding and production.
What NATO country was attacked by Russia?
You people are so **** g'ddammned stupid
Yesterday 10:35 am
The organization serves as a system of collective security, whereby its independent member states agree to mutual defence in response to an attack by any outside party. This is enshrined in Article 5 of the treaty, which states that an armed attack against one member shall be considered an attack against them all.
What NATO country was attacked by Russia?
Yesterday 10:49 am
Is Russia a part of Europe? lol
Yesterday 10:54 am
Yes....a good deal of it...
But Russia is Russia and Europe is Europe.
The attack on Ukraine is considered a threat to NATO allies proximate to it.
Yesterday 11:05 am
What NATO country was attacked by Russia?
RUN ******!
Yesterday 11:12 am
Was Europe the Aggressor?
Still waiting.
Yesterday 11:17 am
Yesterday 1:01 pm
I have a question for you. Pretend you are Germany. You just **** outof your cheap oil by the war in Ukraine that the US started by pulling a coup in Ukraine and harrassing Russia with western offensive weapons on its border.MR-7 » Today, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ **** you NATO.....
Trump is doing what they call "hoe checking" and it's about time.
Trump warns NATO faces 'very bad' future if allies do not help secure Strait of Hormuz
Then Trump **** around in Iran, cause the straight of hormuz to close. And now,m you have 20% of the world's oil stranded off the coast of europe - the perfect conditions for afiresale on cheap energy.
How likely would YOU be to help "fix" this "problem"?
I think that I would see it as a godsend.
RSVP.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 1:02 pm
Because the straight of hormuz is in the north atlantic, and they are in the north atlantic treaty organizatiuon.Blackvegetable » Today, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ Why is NATO obliged to bail him out of a mess of his own making?
Edit - I just checked my risk-board map. My information was not correct.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 1:04 pm
Is the straight of hormuz in the north atlantic?Fuelman » Today, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ The US provides approximately $570 million to $685 million annually directly to NATO’s common-funded budgets (covering administrative, military, and infrastructure costs), representing about 16-22% of that specific budget. However, the US total defense expenditure related to NATO commitments is closer to $900+ billion, representing roughly 62% of all NATO members' combined defense spending
That's right! Time for the rest of NATO to pony up!
Why should they want to fix a "problem" that they did not create, and that strands 20% of the world's petroleum off their coast, right when they have a problem getting cheap energy? What would their MOTIVE be?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 3023 users online :: 4 registered, 14 bots, and 3005 guests
Bots: facebookexternalhit, proximic, CriteoBot, DuckDuckGo, Baiduspider, app.hypefactors.com, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, YandexBot, Googlebot, linkfluence.com, Applebot, curl/7, bingbot