LOL: Excellent!
By MR-7
16 Mar 2026 8:35 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
19 Mar 2026 5:29 pm
-----------------------------------------------------------
It is often said that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was founded in response to the threat posed by the Soviet Union. This is only partially true. In fact, the Alliance’s creation was part of a broader effort to serve three purposes: deterring Soviet expansionism, forbidding the revival of nationalist militarism in Europe through a strong North American presence on the continent, and encouraging European political integration
19 Mar 2026 5:42 pm
jerrab » 19 Mar 2026, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑ -----------------------------------------------------------
It is often said that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was founded in response to the threat posed by the Soviet Union. This is only partially true. In fact, the Alliance’s creation was part of a broader effort to serve three purposes: deterring Soviet expansionism, forbidding the revival of nationalist militarism in Europe through a strong North American presence on the continent, and encouraging European political integration
I already gave you the win, princess.
You can re-google all day. You need it.
"It is often said" because it is the truth. THE SINGLE biggest reason is what I said.
Finding more reasons to ratify something is what you are pushing. Keep going.
You're getting less dumb by the minute.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
19 Mar 2026 5:45 pm
DeezerShoove » 19 Mar 2026, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I already gave you the win, princess.
You can re-google all day. You need it.
"It is often said" because it is the truth. THE SINGLE biggest reason is what I said.
Finding more reasons to ratify something is what you are pushing. Keep going.
You're getting less dumb by the minute.
the single best reason does not mean the only reason.
now you get it.
19 Mar 2026 5:48 pm
Stop lying buttststain. Johnny, you ***, how many times have you been to the stables?
19 Mar 2026 5:49 pm
You are missing the point, dope.jerrab » 19 Mar 2026, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ the single best reason does not mean the only reason.
now you get it.
The others are selling points because of the one real reason.
Keep googling. Let this die, deadend.
btw
What were the "other countries" that were threats at the time?
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
19 Mar 2026 5:51 pm
you never said the single best reason, you said the reason.. meaning the only reason, incidentally I was right. nato was formed to go to the defense of any country that was attacked by any countryDeezerShoove » 19 Mar 2026, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I already gave you the win, princess.
You can re-google all day. You need it.
"It is often said" because it is the truth. THE SINGLE biggest reason is what I said.
Finding more reasons to ratify something is what you are pushing. Keep going.
You're getting less dumb by the minute.
19 Mar 2026 5:52 pm
GERMANY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!DeezerShoove » 19 Mar 2026, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ You are missing the point, dope.
The others are selling points because of the one real reason.
Keep googling. Let this die, deadend.
btw
What were the "other countries" that were threats at the time?
19 Mar 2026 5:56 pm
------------------------------------DeezerShoove » 19 Mar 2026, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ You are missing the point, dope.
The others are selling points because of the one real reason.
Keep googling. Let this die, deadend.
btw
What were the "other countries" that were threats at the time?
preventing the revival of European militarism//////////////
germany
19 Mar 2026 5:57 pm
MR-7 » 19 Mar 2026, 5:11 pm » wrote: ↑ No LIAR jerra. America does not need NATO. I said, they (nato) need to go and secure their own **** ships. So, what nato country did Putin attack? What's that? None you say. Then why, oh why RETARDED one, did nato seek TRUMP's support?........................ PLEASE TRUMP...pull all assets from those nato countries who are not supporting.
tell me why trump is whining nato wont help.
19 Mar 2026 6:09 pm
MR-7 » 19 Mar 2026, 5:11 pm » wrote: ↑ No LIAR jerra. America does not need NATO. I said, they (nato) need to go and secure their own **** ships. So, what nato country did Putin attack? What's that? None you say. Then why, oh why RETARDED one, did nato seek TRUMP's support?........................ PLEASE TRUMP...pull all assets from those nato countries who are not supporting.
President Trump is lashing out at European and NATO leaders who are rejecting his demands to help escort oil ships through the Strait of Hormuz. He's warning that they're making a very foolish mistake and that the U.S. needs to rethink its own support for the European alliance. NPR White House correspondent Franco Ordoñez has this story on the transatlantic tensions. (SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING) PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Hello, everybody. UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Mr. President... FRANCO ORDOÑEZ, BYLINE: On the flight back to Washington, D.C., President Trump turned up the heat on his pressure campaign against allies to help police the Strait of Hormuz, where commercial traffic had slowed to a crawl. He singled out the United Kingdom and France as well as China, Japan and South Korea. (SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING) TRUMP: Really, I'm demanding that these countries come in and protect their own territory because it is their territory. It's the place from which they get their energy.
19 Mar 2026 6:16 pm
tihis is trumps and israels war.MR-7 » 19 Mar 2026, 5:11 pm » wrote: ↑ No LIAR jerra. America does not need NATO. I said, they (nato) need to go and secure their own **** ships. So, what nato country did Putin attack? What's that? None you say. Then why, oh why RETARDED one, did nato seek TRUMP's support?........................ PLEASE TRUMP...pull all assets from those nato countries who are not supporting.
iran did not attack israel or the US.
nato's rules are only for countries that are attacked,
19 Mar 2026 8:03 pm
jerrab » 19 Mar 2026, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑ ------------------------------------
preventing the revival of European militarism//////////////
germany
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
19 Mar 2026 11:06 pm
You might want to watch this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0ceX2nsIQ4
After you do, you might want to lay in stock that meets these criteria:
Your family has to like it.
It has to have an excellent shelf life.
It has to have an excellent calorie to dollar ratio.
It should meet proper fat, carb, and protein ratios (corn beef hash is an example).
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
20 Mar 2026 12:32 am
Regular = WALK per galCannonpointer » 19 Mar 2026, 11:06 pm » wrote: ↑ You might want to watch this.
youtube /watch?v=A0ceX2nsIQ4
After you do, you might want to lay in stock that meets these criteria:
Your family has to like it.
It has to have an excellent shelf life.
It has to have an excellent calorie to dollar ratio.
It should meet proper fat, carb, and protein ratios (corn beef hash is an example).
Premium = JOG par gal
Supreme = RUN LIKE HELL per gal
Diesel = DON'T WORRY, BE HAPPY per gal.
I feel fortunate we are on a well and I have a generator that can run it.. I hope. I have not tested it yet. and I have 240V 21A.
An emergency store has been on the list. I guess I'll stock up. If it gets that bad the zombiepocalyose kicks in and I don't have the security. Preppers are vindicated.
Whip it balloon filler, tube connection, and fill a bag over the head sounds way nicer than cyanide.
Yeah, this shyt is super bad. I guess he didn't know...
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
20 Mar 2026 10:18 am
Iran stated repeatedly to the US that they would NEVER give up their right to enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels, which can ONLY be useful in making nuclear weapons. Once they made that definitive statement, the US and Israel both were convinced that the ONLY solution was to destroy that ability, when it would have been possible for them to successfully build 11 nuclear bombs with the fissile material they still had just a matter of weeks.jerrab » 19 Mar 2026, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- “The UK team were surprised by what the Iranians put on the table,” the former official added.“It was not a complete deal, but it was progress and was unlikely to be the Iranians’ final offer. The British team expected the next round of negotiations to go ahead on the basis of the progress in Geneva.”That next round of talks was due to take place in Vienna on Monday 2 March, but never happened. The US and Israel had launched their all-out attack two days earlier.Powell’s attendance at the Geneva talks, as well as at a previous set of meetings earlier in the month in the Swiss city, helps in part to explain the UK government’s reluctance to back the US attack on Iran, a reluctance that has put the UK-US relationship under unprecedented strain.The UK saw no compelling evidence of an imminent threat of an Iranian missile attack on Europe, or of Iran securing a nuclear weapon. This is the first time it has become clear that Britain was so closely involved in the talks, and so had good reason to decide whether diplomatic options had been exhausted and a US attack was necessary.Instead the UK regarded the attack as unlawful and premature since Powell believed the path remained open to a negotiated solution to the long-running issue of how Iran could reassure the US that it was not seeking a nuclear weapon.
Of course, stupid, naive liberal diplomats ALWAYS want to continue talking and NEVER think their negotiations have failed, or they'd be out of a job!
It's a shame that you're too dumb to acknowledge that!
20 Mar 2026 11:02 am
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ Iran stated repeatedly to the US that they would NEVER give up their right to enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels, which can ONLY be useful in making nuclear weapons. Once they made that definitive statement, the US and Israel both were convinced that the ONLY solution was to destroy that ability, when it would have been possible for them to successfully build 11 nuclear bombs with the fissile material they still had just a matter of weeks.
Of course, stupid, naive liberal diplomats ALWAYS want to continue talking and NEVER think their negotiations have failed, or they'd be out of a job!
It's a shame that you're too dumb to acknowledge that!
In recent 2025–2026 negotiations, Iran has presented several "creative" proposals to break the impasse over its nuclear program. These offers focus on trading limits on its highly enriched uranium (HEU) for sanctions relief and the recognition of its right to peaceful enrichment
20 Mar 2026 11:14 am
20 Mar 2026 11:16 am
----------------------------------------------------Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ Iran stated repeatedly to the US that they would NEVER give up their right to enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels, which can ONLY be useful in making nuclear weapons. Once they made that definitive statement, the US and Israel both were convinced that the ONLY solution was to destroy that ability, when it would have been possible for them to successfully build 11 nuclear bombs with the fissile material they still had just a matter of weeks.
Of course, stupid, naive liberal diplomats ALWAYS want to continue talking and NEVER think their negotiations have failed, or they'd be out of a job!
It's a shame that you're too dumb to acknowledge that!
Mediation: While Oman and other Middle Eastern allies have attempted to restart diplomacy, the Trump administration has recently rejected these efforts in favor of continued military operations
20 Mar 2026 11:29 am
So tell me, genius.jerrab » 20 Mar 2026, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In recent 2025–2026 negotiations, Iran has presented several "creative" proposals to break the impasse over its nuclear program. These offers focus on trading limits on its highly enriched uranium (HEU) for sanctions relief and the recognition of its right to peaceful enrichment
What could the highly enriched uranium that Iran wants to be able to build be used for OTHER than a nuclear weapon?
And since there is NO other possible purpose, of what use is it to consider their "creative" proposals, and what do YOU think would be accomplished by giving them sanctions relief?
20 Mar 2026 11:35 am
----------------------------------------Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ So tell me, genius.
What could the highly enriched uranium that Iran wants to be able to build be used for OTHER than a nuclear weapon?
And since there is NO other possible purpose, of what use is it to consider their "creative" proposals, and what do YOU think would be accomplished by giving them sanctions relief?
isotope uranium-235 () has been increased from its natural ~0.7% level, typically to 3–5% for civilian nuclear power fuel
Who is online
In total there are 3005 users online :: 0 registered, 16 bots, and 2989 guests
Registered users:
Bots: Nutch, DuckDuckBot, Firefox/7.0, Yahoo! Slurp, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Kinza, linkfluence.com, YandexBot, proximic, Googlebot, curl/7, Applebot, GPTBot, bingbot