LOL: Excellent!
By MR-7
16 Mar 2026 8:35 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
20 Mar 2026 11:40 am
They have already enriched their uranium to the 60% level, and want to continue enriching to reach 90%, which is ONLY needed for weapons-grade nuclear bombs.jerrab » 20 Mar 2026, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ ----------------------------------------
isotope uranium-235 () has been increased from its natural ~0.7% level, typically to 3–5% for civilian nuclear power fuel
You haven't explained WHY they refuse to give that up if they have no plans on building nuclear weapons.
20 Mar 2026 11:44 am
answer!Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ They have already enriched their uranium to the 60% level, and want to continue enriching to reach 90%, which is ONLY needed for weapons-grade nuclear bombs.
You haven't explained WHY they refuse to give that up if they have no plans on building nuclear weapons.
Trump’s Former Counterterrorism Director
*Roshambo » 19 Mar 2026, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I found that Iran has maintained a religious fatwa since 2004, which signifies their lack of intention to develop a nuclear bomb.
That right there is as as "Good as Gold", as we know these people take religion "seriously".
It is crucial to emphasize this aspect. Iran aimed to acquire the ability to enrich uranium and obtain necessary components, yet they did not intend to forgo a nuclear bomb. They have taken note of the repercussions experienced by other "neighboring countries." I cannot criticize Iran; were I in their situation, I would also aspire to have a nuclear program. The potential of nuclear energy and medical innovations is vast. The Iranian people are highly intelligent and capable. They are not deficient in intellect, in contrast to the USA, which has a an average of a 6th-grade education level..
This guy "knows" he has access to all the information.
Trump’s Former Counterterrorism Director Finally Confirms What We’ve All Been Thinking…
https://youtu.be/GOuJzvsMeGQ
20 Mar 2026 11:53 am
Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ They have already enriched their uranium to the 60% level, and want to continue enriching to reach 90%, which is ONLY needed for weapons-grade nuclear bombs.
You haven't explained WHY they refuse to give that up if they have no plans on building nuclear weapons.
you have not proven anything at all.
20 Mar 2026 11:53 am
That's no answer, it's nothing more than one man's opinion the he believes Iran WON'T want to build nukes with that highly enriched uranium.
If you think you know the answer, then tell me WHAT PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO BUILD NUCLEAR BOMBS is 90% enrichment needed for?
Any peaceful use of enriched uranium requires no more than 60% enrichment. NOT 90%!!!
Purpose of Enriching Uranium to 90%
Civilian vs. Military UseIran's uranium enrichment program has raised significant concerns regarding its intentions. While Iran claims its nuclear facilities are for civilian purposes, such as energy production, the enrichment levels they pursue suggest otherwise.
- Civilian Use: For nuclear power plants, uranium only needs to be enriched to about 3-5%. This level is sufficient for generating electricity and is compliant with international agreements.
- Military Use: Enriching uranium to 90% is considered weapons-grade and is primarily associated with the development of nuclear weapons. This level of enrichment is not necessary for any peaceful applications.
20 Mar 2026 11:55 am
It is the truth and you don't want to hear itZeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ That's no answer, it's nothing more than one man's opinion the he believes Iran WON'T want to build nukes with that highly enriched uranium.
If you think you know the answer, then tell me WHAT PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO BUILD NUCLEAR BOMBS is 90% enrichment needed for?
Any peaceful use of enriched uranium requires no more than 60% enrichment. NOT 90%!!!Purpose of Enriching Uranium to 90%Civilian vs. Military UseIran's uranium enrichment program has raised significant concerns regarding its intentions. While Iran claims its nuclear facilities are for civilian purposes, such as energy production, the enrichment levels they pursue suggest otherwise.Iran must think ALL Americans are as dumb and naive as you!
- Civilian Use: For nuclear power plants, uranium only needs to be enriched to about 3-5%. This level is sufficient for generating electricity and is compliant with international agreements.
- Military Use: Enriching uranium to 90% is considered weapons-grade and is primarily associated with the development of nuclear weapons. This level of enrichment is not necessary for any peaceful applications.
that is your opinion, and your opinion ain't squat.
Listen to the video. It is all explained.
Additionally, Iran has maintained a religious fatwa since 2004, which signifies their lack of intention to develop a nuclear bomb.
20 Mar 2026 11:56 am
I don't need to prove a damn thing!
Liberal idiots like YOU need to explain what possible use that enrichment to the 90% level there is OTHER THAN for nuclear weapons!
Why are you being so obtuse that you can't understand that?
20 Mar 2026 11:57 am
man the **** up and prove itZeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ I don't need to prove a damn thing!
Liberal idiots like YOU need to explain what possible use that enrichment to the 90% level there is OTHER THAN for nuclear weapons!
Why are you being so obtuse that you can't understand that?
20 Mar 2026 12:01 pm
Prove WHAT?
That it's a well-known fact that there is NO PURPOSE WHATSOEVER for enriching their uranium to 90% OTHER THAN to construct nuclear weapons?
I've already posted that, fool!:Purpose of Enriching Uranium to 90%Civilian vs. Military UseIran's uranium enrichment program has raised significant concerns regarding its intentions. While Iran claims its nuclear facilities are for civilian purposes, such as energy production, the enrichment levels they pursue suggest otherwise.
- Civilian Use: For nuclear power plants, uranium only needs to be enriched to about 3-5%. This level is sufficient for generating electricity and is compliant with international agreements.
- Military Use: Enriching uranium to 90% is considered weapons-grade and is primarily associated with the development of nuclear weapons. This level of enrichment is not necessary for any peaceful applications.
20 Mar 2026 12:05 pm
Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ I don't need to prove a damn thing!
Liberal idiots like YOU need to explain what possible use that enrichment to the 90% level there is OTHER THAN for nuclear weapons!
Why are you being so obtuse that you can't understand that?
then shut up.
no one says 90 per cent
20 Mar 2026 12:05 pm
Please pay attention to the video. That individual possesses significantly more knowledge than you could ever comprehend with your limited understanding.Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Prove WHAT?
That it's a well-known fact that there is NO PURPOSE WHATSOEVER for enriching their uranium to 90% OTHER THAN to construct nuclear weapons?
I've already posted that, fool!urpose of Enriching Uranium to 90%Civilian vs. Military UseIran's uranium enrichment program has raised significant concerns regarding its intentions. While Iran claims its nuclear facilities are for civilian purposes, such as energy production, the enrichment levels they pursue suggest otherwise.
- Civilian Use: For nuclear power plants, uranium only needs to be enriched to about 3-5%. This level is sufficient for generating electricity and is compliant with international agreements.
- Military Use: Enriching uranium to 90% is considered weapons-grade and is primarily associated with the development of nuclear weapons. This level of enrichment is not necessary for any peaceful applications.
20 Mar 2026 1:16 pm
OK, I watched that worthless video and it didn't give a single use that Iran needed 90% enrichment for other than to build nuclear weapons.*Roshambo » 20 Mar 2026, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Please pay attention to the video. That individual possesses significantly more knowledge than you could ever comprehend with your limited understanding.
All it did was to make an attempt to sell the idea that Iran really doesn't want to build nukes, and would rather see their country and their leaders crushed than give up their nuclear weapons ambition.
So what am I missing, genius?
EXPLAIN THE PEACEFUL PURPOSES THAT IRAN HAS FOR DEMANDING THE NEED TO ENRICH THEIR URANIUM THAT HIGH!
20 Mar 2026 1:18 pm
Iran doesn't have 90% enriched Uranium. The video explained it very well. You have a comprehension problem.Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ OK, I watched that worthless video and it didn't give a single use that Iran needed 90% enrichment for other than to build nuclear weapons.
All it did was to make an attempt to sell the idea that Iran really doesn't want to build nukes, and would rather see their country and their leaders crushed than give up their nuclear weapons ambition.
So what am I missing, genius?
EXPLAIN THE PEACEFUL PURPOSES THAT IRAN HAS FOR DEMANDING THE NEED TO ENRICH THEIR URANIUM THAT HIGH!
20 Mar 2026 1:23 pm
No one said they did!*Roshambo » 20 Mar 2026, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Iran doesn't have 90% enriched Uranium. The video explained it very well.
But they refuse to give up their right to enrich that high, which would take only a few weeks to reach since they've already got enough material to make 11 nuclear bombs if they DO reach that 90% level.
But why are you purposely avoiding the question?
WHAT POSSIBLE REASON OTHER THAN TO MAKE A NUCLEAR WEAPON IS 90% ENRICHED URANIUM NEEDED FOR?
And since there is NONE, how is it that you can insist that the country that is the largest sponsor of terrorism throughout the world for the past 47 years is NOT interested in building nukes?
Are you really so determined to be that naive?
20 Mar 2026 1:29 pm
It is evident that you did not pay attention to the video; if you claim that you did, it suggests a comprehension issue on your part.Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ No one said they did!
But they refuse to give up their right to enrich that high, which would take only a few weeks to reach since they've already got enough material to make 11 nuclear bombs if they DO reach that 90% level.
But why are you purposely avoiding the question?
WHAT POSSIBLE REASON OTHER THAN TO MAKE A NUCLEAR WEAPON IS 90% ENRICHED URANIUM NEEDED FOR?
And since there is NONE, how is it that you can insist that the country that is the largest sponsor of terrorism throughout the world for the past 47 years is NOT interested in building nukes?
Are you really so determined to be that naive?
20 Mar 2026 1:39 pm
Par for the Goof Course. 39 Trillion over.*Roshambo » 20 Mar 2026, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ It is evident that you did not pay attention to the video; if you claim that you did, it suggests a comprehension issue on your part.
youtu.be/qK9IvaWdKE4?si=9GNYVjCUZIjGZi3H
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
20 Mar 2026 1:41 pm
Look up! You might see Solar energy interacting with the magnetoshpere!
youtu.be/m2fexQEmPLA?si=rWV366Cm4AXU6xmd
youtu.be/m2fexQEmPLA?si=rWV366Cm4AXU6xmd
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
20 Mar 2026 1:41 pm
Iran has Uranium enriched to 60%. 60% enriched uranium can be used to make a nuclear bomb. Iran has no bomb..Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ No one said they did!
But they refuse to give up their right to enrich that high, which would take only a few weeks to reach since they've already got enough material to make 11 nuclear bombs if they DO reach that 90% level.
But why are you purposely avoiding the question?
WHAT POSSIBLE REASON OTHER THAN TO MAKE A NUCLEAR WEAPON IS 90% ENRICHED URANIUM NEEDED FOR?
And since there is NONE, how is it that you can insist that the country that is the largest sponsor of terrorism throughout the world for the past 47 years is NOT interested in building nukes?
Are you really so determined to be that naive?
You are the one screaming "90% 90%"
20 Mar 2026 2:16 pm
No, it cannot without major design changes!*Roshambo » 20 Mar 2026, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Iran has Uranium enriched to 60%. 60% enriched uranium can be used to make a nuclear bomb. Iran has no bomb..
You are the one screaming "90% 90%"
There remains a significant amount of technical details needed in order to make a nuke with enrichment to only 60%, and it's believe that Iran doesn't have that ability. The explanation I've seen indicates that much more fissile material would be needed if only enriched to 60%, making the bomb too large to be able to place in an Iranian missile, and would instead have to be dropped from a plane as we did in Hiroshima. And of course, a slow-flying bomber carrying that would easily be detected and destroyed long before it could reach its target, but it WOULD likely trigger a retaliatory nuclear strike by Israel or the US in response. Iran has to make sure their bomb successfully destroys Israel before they'd risk using it.
But why do you continue to be unable to answer the question, choosing instead to keep repeating that "Iran has no bomb"?
WHAT DOES IRAN NEED SUCH HIGH ENRICHMENT FOR IF NOT TO CONSTRUCT NUCLEAR WEAPONS?
And while you're musing over that question, explain what Iran has done over the past 47 years that you would trust them NOT to build nukes IF they had that enrichment they need?
Iran can still build nuclear weapons without further enrichment. Only diplomacy will stop it
By Edwin Lyman | Analysis | July 2, 2025
Although Iran may well have every reason—both practical and strategic—not to pursue direct weaponization of its remaining 60-percent enriched HEU, this is a different issue from whether it has the technical capability to do so. The prevailing assertion that Iran needs “weapons-grade” uranium enriched to at least 90 percent uranium 235 to build a nuclear explosive device—widely repeated by government officials, the media, and commentators alike—is simply wrong.
Design considerations. In February, the New York Times reported that Iran was considering a crash program to develop a relatively unsophisticated nuclear weapon within a matter of months that could not be miniaturized to fit on a ballistic missile but could be delivered by other means.
20 Mar 2026 2:21 pm
I believe scientists. Yes 60% can be used for a Nuclear BombZeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it cannot without major design changes!
There remains a significant amount of technical details needed in order to make a nuke with enrichment to only 60%, and it's believe that Iran doesn't have that ability. The explanation I've seen indicates that much more fissile material would be needed if only enriched to 60%, making the bomb too large to be able to place in an Iranian missile, and would instead have to be dropped from a plane as we did in Hiroshima. And of course, a slow-flying bomber carrying that would easily be detected and destroyed long before it could reach its target, but it WOULD likely trigger a retaliatory nuclear strike by Israel or the US in response. Iran has to make sure their bomb successfully destroys Israel before they'd risk using it.
But why do you continue to be unable to answer the question, choosing instead to keep repeating that "Iran has no bomb"?
WHAT DOES IRAN NEED SUCH HIGH ENRICHMENT FOR IF NOT TO CONSTRUCT NUCLEAR WEAPONS?
And while you're musing over that question, explain what Iran has done over the past 47 years that you would trust them NOT to build nukes IF they had that enrichment they need?
https://thebulletin.org/2025/07/iran-ca ... l-stop-it/
21 Mar 2026 6:33 am
Even John Bolton has said the United States acted at the right time to strike Iran, arguing Washington should not wait until a nuclear threat becomes imminent before moving to eliminate it....... 
Who is online
In total there are 3005 users online :: 0 registered, 16 bots, and 2989 guests
Registered users:
Bots: Nutch, DuckDuckBot, Firefox/7.0, Yahoo! Slurp, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Kinza, linkfluence.com, YandexBot, proximic, Googlebot, curl/7, Applebot, GPTBot, bingbot