You keep blaming leaderships of ideologies serving what humanity projects as better economic tomorrows than evolving reached this rotation of the planet so far each lifetime only exists in their relative ancestral lineage and generation gaps evolved into here now.Zeets2 » Yesterday, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ So Trump was bluffing when he promised regime change, then had their top 40 or so leaders killed and the rest ran into hiding?
Was it a bluff when he promised to destroy the Iranian Navy and Air Force?
Or when he had all their communication knocked out?
Or destroyed their missile launchers?
Or blew up their main missile factory?
Use your **** head and recognize the fact that Trump has given them multiple opportunities to relent and give in to his demands which are non-negotiable.
Iran must stop attacking ships in the Strait, give up their nuclear weapon ambitions, turn over their enriched uranium, and select new leadership that meets his approval. And if Iran refuses, then Trump WILL destroy their key bridges, destroy their power plants, and probably take over Kharg Island to gain control of most of their oil shipments after wiping out the IRGC that's attacking ships in the Strait and cutting off their oil funding.
And the fact that supporters of terrorism like you get pissed off at that pleases me no end! :die:
Another Democrat candidate for President eliminated.....the ranks are getting thinned.MR-7 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Cali has had enough.....
Don’t shoot at cops’: Tulare County Sheriff on suspect’s killing by Bearcat PORTERVILLE, Calif. (KSEE/KGPE)
Tulare County Sheriff Mike Boudreaux announced this afternoon that the man accused of shooting and killing Tulare County Detective Randy Hoppert was killed after being run over by a Kern County Sheriff Bearcat vehicle.
“Don’t shoot at cops. You shoot at cops. We’re going to run you over. He got run over. He got what he deserved,” Boudreaux said.![]()
Morales was run over by the Bearcat vehicle after a nearly eight-hour standoff with police and deputies from agencies across the South Valley.
Boudreaux said they intentionally ran the suspect over.![]()
This is what happens when you assault or try to assault a police officer. He is now with Good and Pretti.
There is hope for cali after all. The Sheriff reminds me of those we have here in Fl. THEY DON'T **** AROUND.RebelGator » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Another Democrat candidate for President eliminated.....the ranks are getting thinned.
Mebbe once they reached 90%, they were gonna have a garage sale?Zeets2 » 20 Mar 2026, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Prove WHAT?
That it's a well-known fact that there is NO PURPOSE WHATSOEVER for enriching their uranium to 90% OTHER THAN to construct nuclear weapons?
I've already posted that, fool!urpose of Enriching Uranium to 90%Civilian vs. Military UseIran's uranium enrichment program has raised significant concerns regarding its intentions. While Iran claims its nuclear facilities are for civilian purposes, such as energy production, the enrichment levels they pursue suggest otherwise.
- Civilian Use: For nuclear power plants, uranium only needs to be enriched to about 3-5%. This level is sufficient for generating electricity and is compliant with international agreements.
- Military Use: Enriching uranium to 90% is considered weapons-grade and is primarily associated with the development of nuclear weapons. This level of enrichment is not necessary for any peaceful applications.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ROG62 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Mebbe once they reached 90%, they were gonna sell it at their annual garage sale?
Agreed…Fuelman » 08 Apr 2026, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑It's been estimated that NATO allies have missed their spending targets by $850 billion in the last decade. The total unpaid for the previous 60 years is a massive number. I suggest closing all US bases in those countries and let them fend for themselves.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Fuelman » 08 Apr 2026, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ Numbers? I don't see any numbers! I suppose "All" to you means 100% and that number couldn't be farther from the truth.
Take notes, there will be a test later on:
Top NATO Member Arms Suppliers (2020–2025):
United States: The dominant supplier, holding 42% of global arms exports.
France: A top 5 global exporter, providing nearly 10% of major weapons, with major exports of fighter jets and ships.
Germany: A major supplier focusing on land systems, advanced ammunition, and air defense.
United Kingdom: A significant exporter of military technology and warships.
Turkey (Türkiye): Expanding its role in supplying UAVs and electronic warfare systems.
Netherlands: Contributes significantly to the European defense sector.
Consider your statement debunked!
NATO does not require that percentage of GDP be deposited into a NATO checking account. NATO members are required to spend that percentage of GDP on their own defenses and support the administration side of NATO.
It's been estimated that NATO allies have missed their spending targets by $850 billion in the last decade. The total unpaid for the previous 60 years is a massive number. I suggest closing all US bases in those countries and let them fend for themselves.
Not once in the rest of your post did you mention Iran as the "#1 state sponsor of terror", since 1984 no less. I can't really imagine why you and others throw so much support behind terrorist.
This isn't over, Iran's 10 point plan is laughable. This is merely a resupply break.
It's been estimated that NATO allies have missed their spending targets by $850 billion in the last decade. The total unpaid for the previous 60 years is a massive number. I suggest closing all US bases in those countries and let them fend for themselves.
The same source you use, the Internet.
I don't think so.
Oh, and you don't think it's in Germany's self-interest when they import 77% of their oil and watch the price skyrocket because of Iran's attacks on tankers coming through the Strait?Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Stupid, What you or I think does not mean ****.
It is Germany's job to pursue the interests of GERMANY, you retarded ****. And they CLEARLY believe it is in their best interests to tell Trump to **** off. What you or I THINK of their decision is utterly meaningless.It is reality onthe ground,you cartoon thinking goofball.
I don't give a **** one way or the other, at this point. NATO is dead no matter HOW much or HOW little money the US pour into it. NATO died officially the day fatboy took the USA to its Hadrian's Wall.
Before its official death, it was subjected to near death by papercuts and the Coupkraine fiasco.
Are you really dumb enough to believe the war is over, moron??!?Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:05 pm » wrote: ↑ In your last post, you claimed he wanted the Iranain PEOPLE to kill their leaders. Now you are bragging that he did it.
The intention was REGIME CHANGE. It failed. The same system produced new leaders, fruitcake. And adter threats failed, Fatty begged them into sitting down with him.
CLEARLY it's a bluff when he says he did so, you stupid ****.They are still shooting down 400 million dollar "invisible" F35s and closing the strait and bombing our bases and vassals regularly - or WERE, until they forced Trump to beg for negotiations after the ENTIRE WORLD told him to **** off and handle the problem by himself - same as how he created the problem, doofus.
Here, let me show you some numbers, and thenI am done with the post. I won't read the balance, because you didn't give my post enough consideration to know what numbers I was talking about. And becauseI DO NOT APPRECIATE having to do your work for you.Fuelman » Today, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ Numbers? I don't see any numbers! I suppose "All" to you means 100% and that number couldn't be farther from the truth.
Whatever **** you posted after the original stupidity about not understanding what numbers I was talking about, you are welcome to repost as part of an intelligent response to what I said.Fuelman » 16 Mar 2026, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ The US provides approximately $570 million to $685 million annually directly to NATO’s common-funded budgets (covering administrative, military, and infrastructure costs), representing about 16-22% of that specific budget. However, the US total defense expenditure related to NATO commitments is closer to $900+ billion, representing roughly 62% of all NATO members' combined defense spending
Trump got the door slammed in his face, looked stupid, got desperate, is still flailing.MR-7 » 16 Mar 2026, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ **** you NATO.....
Trump is doing what they call "hoe checking" and it's about time.
Trump warns NATO faces 'very bad' future if allies do not help secure Strait of Hormuz
AGAIN, you ignorant son of a bitch, What I think is in Germany's self interest does not mean ****. Can you learn how to **** THINK???Zeets2 » Today, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, and you don't think it's in Germany's self-interest when they import 77% of their oil and watch the price skyrocket because of Iran's attacks on tankers coming through the Strait?
They don't knowI exist, you ignorant jackass.Zeets2 » Today, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ I'll bet they thank God they don't have an ignorant dope like YOU making their decisions on their imports when they're struggled mightily to barely avoid a third consecutive year of recession last year!
Trump is a little bitch, They told him so. Keep crying, you stupid ****.Zeets2 » Today, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ And you're about to see them screaming bloody murder when they learn how Trump will punish NATO for not helping to keep the Strait open and either reduces our monetary support to NATO or suspends our participation entirely.
Iran did not have a good time being pounded by the most powerful military on earth and their lap dog.Zeets2 » Today, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Are you really dumb enough to believe the war is over, moron??!?
Can you deny that Trump DID wipe out most of Iran's leaders? And you think Trump has to BEG IRAN TO SIT DOWN AND NEGOTIATE A PEACE DEAL after they've had at least 50 of their leaders including their Supreme Leader blown to bits, their Air Force and Navy utterly destroyed, their communications wiped out, their oil revenue severely reduced, their missiles, missile launchers, and missile factories destroyed, along with a major bridge in Teheran and the largest petrochemical plant and Iran's oil depots, and the trillions they've spent on their nuclear weapons programs over decades lost forever?
Their country is now in a shambles, their economy destroyed, their inflation rate is currently over 68%, food prices have more than doubled, their unemployment rate surging, while an idiot like YOU tries to claim it's all a Trump bluff, huh?
GEEZ but you're an imbecile!!!
Knocking out there air force and navy was easy. It was ancient tech anyway.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Iran did not have a good time being pounded by the most powerful military on earth and their lap dog.
But Iran has always known the day was coming. And they spent two decades preparing towithstand the storm and make the war unwinnable for the Great Satan. Iran cannot beat the US. But it CAN and it DID make it impossible for the US to beat them.
Trump has a tar baby on his hands, child. And no, the war is not over until Iran says it is over. Trump desperately TRIED todeclare it over, and Iran said **** that - and continued to bomb the **** out of our bases and ourvassal states in the middle east.
Keep bombing the infrastructure......the Mullahs can throw rocks at the passing tankers.JohnnyYou » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Zeets just doesn't understand the implications of control of the Strait.