Hey ***, do ever stop lying? Please cease to existBlackvegetable » 16 Mar 2026, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ Why is NATO obliged to bail him out of a mess of his own making?
If you find having your uvula power washed with my AlphaMusk objectionable, just shut your **** mouth..
"Deny it, deny it, deny it.". There was a president 30 years ago that practiced that very ideology.
And are you so dumb that you don't understand that it will continue, regardless of how much of the NATO budget the US provides or how much of it Trump cuts?Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Psst. Dummy.
The majority of spending in "NATO" enriches the United States Military Industrial Complex. Here's how AI sees it:
Wrong again, dickhead!Cannonpointer » 11 Apr 2026, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ The NATO nations will pursue THEIR itnerests, and what some old quean BELIEVES their responsibilities are, and what their ACTUAL responsibilities are, exist in different worlds.
The Europeans are building their own MIC, decoupling their security interests from ours, as they no longer trust us.Zeets2 » Today, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ And are you so dumb that you don't understand that it will continue, regardless of how much of the NATO budget the US provides or how much of it Trump cuts?
Where else do you think NATO can go to get the military weapons they need to maintain a counter to Russia, genius?
Res Ipsa Loquitur.Zeets2 » Today, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑Wrong again, dickhead!Cannonpointer » 11 Apr 2026, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ The NATO nations will pursue THEIR itnerests, and what some old quean BELIEVES their responsibilities are, and what their ACTUAL responsibilities are, exist in different worlds.
You sure cleave to the dumb lane, sissy.Zeets2 » Today, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑
How come NATO now agrees that THEIR interests have now met with Trump's demands and 22 of their members are sending ships to aid in the Trump blockade of the Strait? Could it be that their responsibilities DO NOT exist in different worlds than ours and you're shocked, SHOCKED to learn that they acceded to Trump's demands?:
No, you somehow got AI squawking, and that got you squaking. Your report is full of **** - likely altered to save your tiny ego.Zeets2 » Today, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ Search Assist
NATO countries are coming together to help secure the Strait of Hormuz, with 22 nations, including several European allies, expressing readiness to contribute to efforts ensuring safe passage through this critical waterway. This coalition aims to restore maritime traffic amid ongoing tensions in the region.
Looks like they've once again proven what an ignorant, know-nothing buffoon you are!
31stArrival » Today, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ "Deny it, deny it, deny it.". There was a president 30 years ago that practiced that very ideology. There were to more administrations with the same attitude between him and Trump's second term.
Blackvegetable » Today, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ If you find having your uvula power washed with my AlphaMusk objectionable, just shut your **** mouth..
Never possible, my mom was female, my dad male. My 4 grandparents 2 females and 2 males. My 8 great grandparents 4 females and 4 males. my 16 great great were 8 females and 8 males.
The master babbling **** has spoke! (Of course its after he polished his moms horse dick.)31stArrival » Today, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑ Never possible, my mom was female, my dad male. My 4 grandparents 2 females and 2 males. My 8 great grandparents 4 females and 4 males. my 16 great great were 8 females and 8 males. My previous generation gaps averaged 30 years between adding another generation. My great great grandparents were alive during the civil war. Evolving works in plain sight, evolution theory is debated socially between ancestors not accepting how they exist in real time, same as religious theology, spiritual mythology, political philosophy, and economic theory. I lived 35 years before I had conceived grandchildren of my parents. My children never met their great grandparents from my side of the family they arrived in.
Your mind ever wrap around how evolving works in series parallel time instead of governed by intellectual time management of reasonable doubt now is eternity, traditionally practiced every generation of 5 ancestral lineages since dawn of civilization, directing people cradle to grave as specifically alive here now?
Cause and effect of human behavior recording how ancestries behaved every generation gap so far current events are staged forward daily here by power of suggesting nobody can understand series parallel time evolved since conception. Leap of faith or jumping to inaccurate conclusions created by hope, faith, charity, 7 tomorrows 52 weeks a year regardless which winter solstice your hemisphere has when inhabiting time daily here.
North or south of the equator hemisphere. today or tomorrow dawn to dusk, yesterday and today dusk to dawn.
AM side of rotation vs PM side of rotation of the planet. 6 halves and 8 corners(seasonal shifts) of the whole atmosphere not including being alive since conception or never existed at all past, current events, life adapts forward now in binary code of 0 or 1 ancestor at a time genetically combined to current global population living next rotation.
It is a universal self evident constant each brain navigates as long as its body has a heartbeat since conception into a specific lifetime, specific ancestry, specific species, specific solar system, specific galaxy, universally displaced here now.
My genetic brain has, your social mind won't try. this post Kept It(life) Simple Stupid. Everyone believes life exceeds their personal time adapting since conception as all facts of life conclude living doesn't start until date of birth. 0-9 months of changing shape since original fertilized cell to infant born male or female replacing their previous 4 generation gaps living daily here one at a time
What was that line in the declaration of Independence "We hold these truths to be self evident all men are created equally here.". Biology doesn't define ancestors with context, just chromosomes occupying time now. 23 double helix DNA each reproduction in the homo sapiens species ever existed so far living eternally separated in their own time and skin as conceived in order of arrival to departure.
You destroy the credibility of the reality your character role model defends with every post.murdock » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The master babbling **** has spoke! (Of course its after he polished his moms horse dick.)
Why would you think I have a problem with that?Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑ The Europeans are building their own MIC, decoupling their security interests from ours, as they no longer trust us.
Deal with it, fruitcake.
Well, there was always the off-chance that you were smart enough to understand that a European MIC would compete with out own - which is one of the two reasons why NATO really exists. The other is to provide cover for the crimes of empire.
You don't get it. They didn't WANT the divorce. They're the abandoned spouse. The US is leaving them holding the bag in the failed Coupkraine Project. Then it's cutting off their petrol from the middle east, making them vassal-clients of US oil interests. Then it's hitting htem with tariffs, and threatening them with more.Zeets2 » Today, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ If they think they can protect themselves without US help, more power to them.
NATO "funding" is a side show, tard. The total funding for NATO is 5 Billion. With a B.Zeets2 » Today, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Cut NATO funding to the bone, and Trump can then build a real coalition with countries that see the value of our alliance, and let Europe safeguard their own oil tankers through the Gulf.
Leave it to liberal morons like yourself who can so easily dismiss a cost of $5 billion taxpayer dollars for some worthless "alliance" that gives us nothing in return. Even if we were to pull out all together, NATO would still need to buy our military equipment, especially now after the world has seen how overmatched the equipment that China and Russia have supplied to Iran are, when we wiped them out within days.Cannonpointer » Today, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, there was always the off-chance that you were smart enough to understand that a European MIC would compete with out own - which is one of the two reasons why NATO really exists. The other is to provide cover for the crimes of empire.
You don't get it. They didn't WANT the divorce. They're the abandoned spouse. The US is leaving them holding the bag in the failed Coupkraine Project. Then it's cutting off their petrol from the middle east, making them vassal-clients of US oil interests. Then it's hitting htem with tariffs, and threatening them with more.
The love is gone, stooge.
NATO "funding" is a side show, tard. The total funding for NATO is 5 Billion. With a B.
The total spent on weapons and materiel - most of it with the US MIC - is 1.5 Trillion.
With a T, you ignorant ape.
The US' inordinate share of the NATO budget is a talking point - not a thing. We spent more studying the sex habits of the South American swamp rat.
31stArrival » Today, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ You destroy the credibility of the reality your character role model defends with every post.
!.5 trillion in weapons purchases is not "nothing," you ignorant ****.Zeets2 » Today, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Leave it to liberal morons like yourself who can so easily dismiss a cost of $5 billion taxpayer dollars for some worthless "alliance" that gives us nothing in return.