Oh good, the savings alone will pay for the conflict…Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ "Your war, not ours. You startedit. You finish it - bitch." - DIRECT quote from NATO allies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh6a7Dju3kQ
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Yes, we're saving hundreds of billions. Never SEEN such savings.
Even if they did, it will wasted on Lobsters, Steaks, pianos, flutes, and a bunch of other ****.Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2026, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, we're saving hundreds of billions. Never SEEN such savings.
Such a deal.![]()
Italy. Spain. UK. Germany. Ya know what all of these nations have in common? Deepwater ports. Navies. Significant NATO economies. Oh - and they're all telling trumpypoo **** himself. You broke it you bought it, bitch.*Roshambo » 16 Mar 2026, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Even if they did, it will wasted on Lobsters, Steaks, pianos, flutes, and a bunch of other ****.
And the pipe he's smoking it in.
I call ****.Fuelman » 16 Mar 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ Individual Action vs. Alliance Action: While NATO as an organization might not act, it is expected that individual allied countries will engage in securing the route.
Those NATO countries that don't see it as a threat are putting their neck on the line. They are going to pay one way or another.
Patience.Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2026, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ I call ****.
Outside of UK sending some drone mnine sweepers, name the NATO country that is getting involved unilaterally.
It seems to me that this closure could be a godsend for europe. They're suffering high fuel prices, and now they have desperate sellers stacked up a few hundred miles offshore.
And that is precisely what you can expect.Fuelman » 16 Mar 2026, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ Patience.
NATO has proven to be a lot of talk with little action in the past.
More reason to not be a part of NATO.Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2026, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ And that is precisely what you can expect.
Little action.
More reasons not to go around **** with other countries.Fuelman » 16 Mar 2026, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ More reason to not be a part of NATO.
There will be consequences!
In a perfect world we wouldn't have to screw with other countries. It's not a perfect world.Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2026, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ More reasons not to go around **** with other countries.
There will be consequences. One of those isthat even your VASSALS will tell you to handle your own ****.
I don't know how good you are at geography, but the skr8t of hormuze is not in the North Atlantic.
Tell me this: If you're Germany, and you just had your colonial occupier **** off your cheap fuel deal with Russia, and that colonial occupier just **** off the hormuz straight such that 20% of the world's oil and gas is stranded just off your coast begging for a customer, would YOU help them correct that?
If so, why, please?
We don't have to in an imperfect world, either. Trump CHOSE to - after promising the opposite.Fuelman » 16 Mar 2026, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ In a perfect world we wouldn't have to screw with other countries. It's not a perfect world.
I agree. Empire vs. the nation state.Fuelman » 16 Mar 2026, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I have the luxury of not giving a crap what Germany has to say on the matter. Those **** in Germany should go GREEN!
I could care less about the oil, this is a battle of ideologies from my perspective.
I'm not.Fuelman » 16 Mar 2026, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑I'm expecting an announcement soon for a new name, "Strait of America"! You can pass for a nominal fee.
Oh, I am American, son.
Lol fake newsCannonpointer » Today, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ "Your war, not ours. You startedit. You finish it - bitch." - DIRECT quote from NATO allies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh6a7Dju3kQ
When this Iran scenario is over, America really needs to set up shield over the Americas from the other 5 continents globally here. America needs to end its funding to the united nations and kick it out of the western hemisphere. America needs to exit nato. Worst case scenario, cut off south America also, while still controlling the Panama Canal. Play the same rules used by Iran and the eastern world.Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2026, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, I am American, son.
You... maybe not so much.
You put Israel first. I don't.
Become a republic again?31stArrival » 16 Mar 2026, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑ When this Iran scenario is over, America really needs to set up shield over the Americas from the other 5 continents globally here. America needs to end its funding to the united nations and kick it out of the western hemisphere. America needs to exit nato. Worst case scenario, cut off south America also, while still controlling the Panama Canal. Play the same rules used by Iran and the eastern world.