Trump Dementia Syndrome is Real.. 48th or bust via the 25th.. NO KINGS Saturday.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
no spam
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
There was no school, you simple ***.....other than the radical Mudslime one than is doing your teaching.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/ ... -131316204
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
Link?RebelGator » 23 Mar 2026, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ There was no school, you simple ***.....other than the radical Mudslime one than is doing your teaching.
Smart enough to obey social consensus isn't smart enough to navigate space by your own brain staying alive each personal heartbeat forward since conception let alone date of birth.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/ ... -131316204
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
You really need to understand the separation between social mindset and personal brain navigating living as eternally separated by your own heartbeat now.Johnny You » 23 Mar 2026, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ Trump Dementia Syndrome is Real.. 48th or bust via the 25th.. NO KINGS Saturday.
If you aren't showing him a link from a leftist "news" outlet, he rejects it. It's never worth your time.
SouthernFried » 23 Mar 2026, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ If you aren't showing him a link from a leftist "news" outlet, he rejects it. It's never worth your time.
I like using the term "common since conception" instead of "common sense learned" after birth. Reasonable doubt doesn't save actual time alive since living is an eternal separation of each reproduction living forward now.RebelGator » 23 Mar 2026, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ if he could only link his brain up with common sense. :wave:
Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/ ... -131316204
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/ ... -131316204
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/ ... -131316204
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/ ... -131316204
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/ ... -131316204
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/ ... -131316204
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/ ... -131316204
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ “The situation is very severe,” Birol said in Australia.
The oil crises of 1973 and 1979, he said, lost together 10 million barrels per day, causing "major economic problems around the world, the recessions. And today, only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day — so more than two major oil shocks put together.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, he said, the gas markets, especially in Europe, “lost about 75 billion cubic meters, 75BCM. And as of now, as a result of this crisis, we lost about 140BCM, almost twice (as much).”
https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/ ... -131316204
Let's talk about "Agency" for a moment.
Grafty's Operation Epic Epstein is removing more oil supply from the markets than 73 and 79 combined, and TWICE as much nat gas as Pootie's 'genius' and 'savvy' Ukraine invasion - for which you dimwits were convinced to blame Biden.
Entirely consequent to Grafty's exercise of discretion.
Not to mention that he vaporized a school.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Can't see any sense at all in putting a rapist felon in the WH...
Impossible. He is programmed. He's essentially a leftist robot who does nothing but parrot exactly what he sees and hears from mainstream media. He's an easily controlled sucker and exactly what the higher powers love to see. That idiot would die fighting for a Democrat politician. Lol