You're too stupid to realize Trump’s distaste for Iran's Mullahs does not extend to the common people...when he's done making mullah mincemeat, the people need an economy to prospor and succeed.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ But the Trump administration has struggled to articulate the logic of the “general license” that the Treasury Department issued late Friday. The sanctions exemption allows Iranian oil to be sold to most countries, including the United States, for the next month. The sanctions relief for Iran followed a similar reprieve this month allowing Russian oil that is currently at sea to be sold.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who announced the Iran exemption, described the move as an act of martial artistry.
“In essence, we are jiujitsuing the Iranians,” Mr. Bessent said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program on Sunday. “We are using their own oil against them.”
Ibid.
You spend much of your day anticipating pudding, I bet...RebelGator » 24 Mar 2026, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ You're too stupid to realize Trump’s distaste for Iran's Mullahs does not extend to the common people...when he's done making mullah mincemeat, the people need an economy to prospor and succeed.
You need to put the NYT in the bottom of the bird cage, where it belongs.
Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ But the Trump administration has struggled to articulate the logic of the “general license” that the Treasury Department issued late Friday. The sanctions exemption allows Iranian oil to be sold to most countries, including the United States, for the next month. The sanctions relief for Iran followed a similar reprieve this month allowing Russian oil that is currently at sea to be sold.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who announced the Iran exemption, described the move as an act of martial artistry.
“In essence, we are jiujitsuing the Iranians,” Mr. Bessent said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program on Sunday. “We are using their own oil against them.”
Ibid.
Are you having a seizure?"Blah...Blah...Iran....Cash.....Pallets.....Blah....Blah.....Obama....Mullahs.....Blah....Blah.....Derp!"...
Tough times for Toadies.
Every last one of those dollars is more likely to kill me than smoking.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑ Trump Faces Blowback on Easing Iran Oil Sanctions
President Trump once assailed the Obama administration for making cash payments to Iran. Now he supports sanctions relief that could give the country a $14 billion windfall.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/23/busi ... f-oil.html
It's gotta suck to be a MAGAt....slogans that were once so funny must taste like urine soaked saw dust when shoved down their throats.
No wonder they're bitter.
So **** stupid.
With the kind of money that trump is just GIVING Iran on a platter, he's likely as not to die a lot more violently than from a seizure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-f3CFzahrRsBlackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ But the Trump administration has struggled to articulate the logic of the “general license” that the Treasury Department issued late Friday. The sanctions exemption allows Iranian oil to be sold to most countries, including the United States, for the next month. The sanctions relief for Iran followed a similar reprieve this month allowing Russian oil that is currently at sea to be sold.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who announced the Iran exemption, described the move as an act of martial artistry.
“In essence, we are jiujitsuing the Iranians,” Mr. Bessent said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program on Sunday. “We are using their own oil against them.”
Ibid.
Both in the onboarding and offboarding aspectsBlackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ You spend much of your day anticipating pudding, I bet...
He's having a victory lap inspired by schadenfreude.
No life of quiet desperation his.
That he is aware of, anyway.
In my house, we had one tv...
I used to enjoy watching all of the dixeland stuff. And then one day, I thought, "Hey, wait a minute. Are they laughing WITH me?"Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ In my house, we had one tv...
I never saw ANY of that ****...no Rebel hi-jinx...
70s BBC sitcoms.....and I Claudius...Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2026, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ I used to enjoy watching all of the dixeland stuff. And then one day, I thought, "Hey, wait a minute. Are they laughing WITH me?"
Idunno why, but things got clearer when I turned sixty.
Fawlty Towers was Absolutely Fabulous.
Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2026, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ Fawlty Towers was Absolutely Fabulous.
So was Ab Fab...
Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑ Trump Faces Blowback on Easing Iran Oil Sanctions
President Trump once assailed the Obama administration for making cash payments to Iran. Now he supports sanctions relief that could give the country a $14 billion windfall.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/23/busi ... f-oil.html
It's gotta suck to be a MAGAt....slogans that were once so funny must taste like urine soaked saw dust when shoved down their throats.
No wonder they're bitter.
So **** stupid.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Those came later...
The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
