Cry to Deezer.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ But the Trump administration has struggled to articulate the logic of the “general license” that the Treasury Department issued late Friday. The sanctions exemption allows Iranian oil to be sold to most countries, including the United States, for the next month. The sanctions relief for Iran followed a similar reprieve this month allowing Russian oil that is currently at sea to be sold.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who announced the Iran exemption, described the move as an act of martial artistry.
“In essence, we are jiujitsuing the Iranians,” Mr. Bessent said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program on Sunday. “We are using their own oil against them.”
Ibid.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ You spend much of your day anticipating pudding, I bet...
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ In my house, we had one tv...
I never saw ANY of that ****...no Rebel hi-jinx...
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

brown’s definitely the dumbest **** alive…hands down!RebelGator » 24 Mar 2026, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ You're too stupid to realize Trump’s distaste for Iran's Mullahs does not extend to the common people...when he's done making mullah mincemeat, the people need an economy to prospor and succeed.
You need to put the NYT in the bottom of the bird cage, where it belongs.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ^^^ obviously challenged….Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2026, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ I used to enjoy watching all of the dixeland stuff. And then one day, I thought, "Hey, wait a minute. Are they laughing WITH me?"
Idunno why, but things got clearer when I turned sixty.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The only disappointment of that series is there weren’t more episodes…Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2026, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ Fawlty Towers was Absolutely Fabulous.
So was Ab Fab...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Yeah, I thought Fawlty was 80 - and I suspect abfab is 90s.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Those came later...
The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin.
Other than the breakup I don't think Protestants endured a schism...Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2026, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, I thought Fawlty was 80 - and I suspect abfab is 90s.
I never saw the fall and rise - but maybe I can find it. I like british humor.
You being a fan of it as well, I shall share a joke I wrote that I think have that sort of dry wryness.
A group of sheep is a flock of sheep
A group of crows is a murder of crows
A group of dolphins is a pod of dolphins
What do you call a group of protestants?
A schism of protestants.
Yup. As I recall there are only - what? 11?ROG62 » 24 Mar 2026, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ The only disappointment of that series is there weren’t more episodes…
Every one of the thousands of protestant sects represents a schism.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Other than the breakup I don't think Protestants endured a schism...
But your audience won't know.
Praise be to Allah!Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2026, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Every one of the thousands of protestant sects represents a schism.
Before they were methodists, they were something. ANd then they schismed and became something else.
Would you like to know the 3 steps to creating a schism in any given protestant sect?
Step 1: Lock 2 members of the same sect in a room together for 1 hour.
Step 2: I'm just kidding. There's only one step.
Yeah…I think 12…Cleese was probably told by his drs he had to quit…the manufactured stress was probably killing him…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Trump is gonna kill your portfolio. No Stress.ROG62 » 24 Mar 2026, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah…I think 12…Cleese was probably told by his drs he had to quit…the manufactured stress was probably killing him…
Thoughts.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑ Trump Faces Blowback on Easing Iran Oil Sanctions
President Trump once assailed the Obama administration for making cash payments to Iran. Now he supports sanctions relief that could give the country a $14 billion windfall.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/23/busi ... f-oil.html
It's gotta suck to be a MAGAt....slogans that were once so funny must taste like urine soaked saw dust when shoved down their throats.
No wonder they're bitter.
So **** stupid.