You think it's a good idea for fish to vote?Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑ The Kansas cautionary tale started in 2013, when the documentary proof of citizenship law, which was passed in 2011, went into force. A federal judge struck down the law as unconstitutional in 2018, by which time the law had blocked the registration of around 31,000 otherwise eligible voters, or about 12 percent of all those who had tried to register for the first time.
Among them was Steven Fish, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit that successfully challenged the law. Mr. Fish, hoping to vote for the first time, was prevented from registering when he couldn’t furnish the necessary documents. Like about half of American citizens, he didn’t have a passport, and, having been born on a since-shuttered military base, he was unable to track down his birth certificate.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/24/us/p ... ansas.html
But it is well worth the effort to ensure "election security"....
These people are so **** g'ddammned stupid....
Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑ The Kansas cautionary tale started in 2013, when the documentary proof of citizenship law, which was passed in 2011, went into force. A federal judge struck down the law as unconstitutional in 2018, by which time the law had blocked the registration of around 31,000 otherwise eligible voters, or about 12 percent of all those who had tried to register for the first time.
Among them was Steven Fish, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit that successfully challenged the law. Mr. Fish, hoping to vote for the first time, was prevented from registering when he couldn’t furnish the necessary documents. Like about half of American citizens, he didn’t have a passport, and, having been born on a since-shuttered military base, he was unable to track down his birth certificate.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/24/us/p ... ansas.html
But it is well worth the effort to ensure "election security"....
These people are so **** g'ddammned stupid....
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

We first applied A.I. in Kansas and Colorado with remarkable results.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑ The Kansas cautionary tale started in 2013, when the documentary proof of citizenship law, which was passed in 2011, went into force. A federal judge struck down the law as unconstitutional in 2018, by which time the law had blocked the registration of around 31,000 otherwise eligible voters, or about 12 percent of all those who had tried to register for the first time.
Among them was Steven Fish, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit that successfully challenged the law. Mr. Fish, hoping to vote for the first time, was prevented from registering when he couldn’t furnish the necessary documents. Like about half of American citizens, he didn’t have a passport, and, having been born on a since-shuttered military base, he was unable to track down his birth certificate.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/24/us/p ... ansas.html
But it is well worth the effort to ensure "election security"....
These people are so **** g'ddammned stupid....
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom https://omega4america.substack.com/p/ho ... dium=emailCannonpointer » 24 Mar 2026, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ That they know about...
Could be many millions that they DON'T know about.
"ASSOCIATE" professor? I want a real professor.
And I'm sure I can find some dirt on Rutgers. You need to tell THIS story walkin.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Like Trump NOT being convicted of rape?Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ I did...
Courts are "finders of fact"..Facts will always trump spurious correlation.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Oh, so now you’re trying to reframe…got it…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom *shocked*
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Some courts are "purveyors of fiction".....if it wears a black robe, you want to suck it's dick....that's kinda strange, Kaplan.Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ I did...
Courts are "finders of fact"..Facts will always trump spurious correlation.
Blackvegetable » 24 Mar 2026, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ No one said he was convicted of rape.
This is how irredeemably stupid you are.
Blackvegetable » 25 Mar 2026, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ If 8,000 you should have no problem finding one.
If you can't, you change your handle to."BornBottom"...
Deal?
You clinging to an inconsequential post verdict opinion…Blackvegetable » 25 Mar 2026, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑ This has ALWAYS been in a context of you being a **** idiot...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom apparently you’re too **** stupid…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom