Liberal Forum

The Department of Justice (DOJ) and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, a former national security adviser in President Donald Trump’s first term, reached an undisclosed financial settlement Wednesday, according to court documents.

 Flynn sought a $50 million payout from the government for what he claimed were politically motivated actions against him.

The settlement brings an end to a years-long dispute that stemmed from false claims of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.Once Flynn has confirmed receipt of the settlement funds, he and the DOJ will file a joint dismissal of the case with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs and fees, the agreement shows.

 The former Trump adviser’s lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://www.ntd.com/doj-flynn-reach-fin ... wVCg%3D%3D
 

ROG62 » 26 Mar 2026, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:04 am

The Department of Justice (DOJ) and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, a former national security adviser in President Donald Trump’s first term, reached an undisclosed financial settlement Wednesday, according to court documents.

 Flynn sought a $50 million payout from the government for what he claimed were politically motivated actions against him.

The settlement brings an end to a years-long dispute that stemmed from false claims of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.Once Flynn has confirmed receipt of the settlement funds, he and the DOJ will file a joint dismissal of the case with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs and fees, the agreement shows.

 The former Trump adviser’s lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://www.ntd.com/doj-flynn-reach-fin ... wVCg%3D%3D

Cop a plea, get a check...

from false claims of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

Judge Rudolph Contreras was initially assigned to the case, and he accepted the plea bargain between Flynn and Special Counsel Robert Mueller in December 2017. One week later, Judge Contreras recused himself, and the case was reassigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. Sentencing was postponed several times to allow for cooperation with the Special Counsel investigation. In a sentencing hearing in December 2018, Flynn reiterated his guilty plea before Judge Sullivan, who postponed sentencing again.

 

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:10 am

ROG62 » 26 Mar 2026, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:04 am

The Department of Justice (DOJ) and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, a former national security adviser in President Donald Trump’s first term, reached an undisclosed financial settlement Wednesday, according to court documents.

 Flynn sought a $50 million payout from the government for what he claimed were politically motivated actions against him.

The settlement brings an end to a years-long dispute that stemmed from false claims of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.Once Flynn has confirmed receipt of the settlement funds, he and the DOJ will file a joint dismissal of the case with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs and fees, the agreement shows.

 The former Trump adviser’s lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://www.ntd.com/doj-flynn-reach-fin ... wVCg%3D%3D

Cop a plea, get a check...

from false claims of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

Judge Rudolph Contreras was initially assigned to the case, and he accepted the plea bargain between Flynn and Special Counsel Robert Mueller in December 2017. One week later, Judge Contreras recused himself, and the case was reassigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. Sentencing was postponed several times to allow for cooperation with the Special Counsel investigation. In a sentencing hearing in December 2018, Flynn reiterated his guilty plea before Judge Sullivan, who postponed sentencing again.

 

 

And the part you always leave out:Flynn initially pleaded guilty but then withdrew that plea, claiming he did not intentionally lie and was misled by his attorneys to enter the guilty plea because prosecutors threatened legal action against his son.Internal emails from Flynn’s first legal team showed this was true—prosecutors informed his legal team that Flynn’s son would be left alone if he signed the guilty plea.

Huey » 26 Mar 2026, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:26 am

And the part you always leave out:Flynn initially pleaded guilty but then withdrew that plea, claiming he did not intentionally lie and was misled by his attorneys to enter the guilty plea because prosecutors threatened legal action against his son.Internal emails from Flynn’s first legal team showed this was true—prosecutors informed his legal team that Flynn’s son would be left alone if he signed the guilty plea.

Don't leave out what the FBI may have had on his son.


Or the fact that it wasn't a reason why Barr sought to accommodate 
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:30 am

Don't leave out what the FBI may have had on his son.


Or the fact that it wasn't a reason why Barr sought to accommodate 
 

 

AI

• No Charges: Michael G. Flynn was a subject of the investigation, but he was never charged with any crime.
• Pressure on his Father: Defense attorneys for the elder Michael Flynn later claimed that prosecutors from the Special Counsel's office used the threat of prosecuting his son as leverage to coerce him into a guilty plea for lying to the FBI, a claim which the Justice Department under Attorney General William Barr later cited as a reason for dropping the case against the elder Flynn.

 

Huey » 26 Mar 2026, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:34 am

AI

• No Charges: Michael G. Flynn was a subject of the investigation, but he was never charged with any crime.
• Pressure on his Father: Defense attorneys for the elder Michael Flynn later claimed that prosecutors from the Special Counsel's office used the threat of prosecuting his son as leverage to coerce him into a guilty plea for lying to the FBI, a claim which the Justice Department under Attorney General William Barr later cited as a reason for dropping the case against the elder Flynn.

Doesn't answer the question. 

Special Counsel's office used the threat of prosecuting his son as leverage to coerce him into a guilty plea for lying to the FBI, a claim which the Justice Department under Attorney General William Barr later cited as a reason for dropping the case against the elder Flynn.

False.

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2026, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:54 am

Doesn't answer the question. 


False.

 

LMAO!

Huey » 26 Mar 2026, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:55 am

LMAO!

Neither does that.

Biden and his old cartel should have to pay him personally. That mother **** Biden is the gift that keeps on giving. He should get the death penalty.

PhiloBeddo » 26 Mar 2026, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:58 am

Biden and his old cartel should have to pay him personally. That mother **** Biden is the gift that keeps on giving. He should get the death penalty.

He was prosecuted by a Grifty appointee.


**** idiot.
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2026, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:59 am

He was prosecuted by a Grifty appointee.

**** idiot.

You are beyond stupid. You are just a shill for foreign governments. 

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2026, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:56 am

Neither does that.

 

Apparently you are not smart enough to realize that no charges means they did not quite have what you thought they had.

Acknowledged you were answered.  That is all you get.


 

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:10 am

Cop a plea, get a check...

Judge Rudolph Contreras was initially assigned to the case, and he accepted the plea bargain between Flynn and Special Counsel Robert Mueller in December 2017. One week later, Judge Contreras recused himself, and the case was reassigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. Sentencing was postponed several times to allow for cooperation with the Special Counsel investigation. In a sentencing hearing in December 2018, Flynn reiterated his guilty plea before Judge Sullivan, who postponed sentencing again.

They can bully. 

They can pay.

They bullied.

They paid. 
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2026, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:56 am

Neither does that.

Maybe he was paid by one, too. 

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2026, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:54 am

Doesn't answer the question. 


 

No questions dick sucker 
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2026, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 10:59 am

He was prosecuted by a Grifty appointee.

**** idiot.

Under whose direction?


 

Cannonpointer » 26 Mar 2026, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 11:48 am

No questions dick sucker

 

ROG62 » 26 Mar 2026, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 11:59 am

Under whose direction?

Grifty's DoJ, you **** imbecile.

Huey » 26 Mar 2026, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 11:03 am

Apparently you are not smart enough to realize that no charges means they did not quite have what you thought they had.

Acknowledged you were answered.  That is all you get.

it means that the charges were DROPPED as a condition of his plea.

they did not quite have what you thought they had.

why would he cop a plea?


You're a **** idiot.

Try answering the question now.

Acknowledged you were answered.  That is all you get.

Acknowledge that your "pledge" isn't worth ****.

Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2026, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2026, 12:06 pm

it means that the charges were DROPPED as a condition of his plea.

why would he cop a plea?

You're a **** idiot.

Try answering the question now.

Acknowledge that your "pledge" isn't worth ****.

Umm, the plea was withdrawn,