Liberal Forum

Since most of you are defending Trump in this war, I am curious to see how many US soldiers you believe are worth dying for it.

Vegas » 01 Apr 2026, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 7:04 pm

Since most of you are defending Trump in this war, I am curious to see how many US soldiers you believe are worth dying for it.

The sacrifice soldiers make to safeguard American citizens against a nuclear bomb attack should not be politicized, and Israelis are helping to reduce the  toll resulting from it.
 

RebelGator » 01 Apr 2026, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 7:39 pm

The sacrifice soldiers make to safeguard American citizens against a nuclear bomb attack should not be politicized, and Israelis are helping to reduce the  toll resulting from it.

This is a textbook Fox news report. Did you copy/paste that from their site?

Vegas » 01 Apr 2026, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 7:04 pm

Since most of you are defending Trump in this war, I am curious to see how many US soldiers you believe are worth dying for it.

Since the biggest argument against the war is Israel's involvement,
one can assume your version of a "correct" answer is none.

I once got into it with CP and he made a statement about "an honest question" with which I tend to agree.
I asked what he meant by that comment regardless to see what he would say.
He said it was a leading question or one you already know the answer to but are trying to trap the other guy.
It is what BlaVe does every time he posts.

Your last choice in your poll is a perfect example that gives it away.

What if, hypothetically, someone doesn't care who helps us, but thinks the Iranians
will never stop trying until they get it?  The nuke.

**** as the Israeli government is, would that taint "the mission" enough to oblige you to be against the action?
Consequently any person who believed in that hypothetical would be considered a naive boob and ignored.

Just thought I'd ask...  

 
 

Vegas » 01 Apr 2026, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 7:42 pm

This is a textbook Fox news report. Did you copy/paste that from their site?

Please.....
 

DeezerShoove » 01 Apr 2026, 8:00 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 8:00 pm

What if, hypothetically, someone doesn't care who helps us, but thinks the Iranians will never stop trying until they get it?
The nuke.
**** as the Israeli government is, would that taint "the mission" enough to oblige you to be against the action?
Consequently any person who believed in that hypothetical would be considered a naive boob and ignored.

Just thought I'd ask...

Ok first...I am highly insulted that you would compare me to BV about anything. That's low. That is just low. 

If they get a nuke, they can't reach us. They just can't. They can reach Israel just fine, but so? That is their problem. 

How many people would die if Iran gets a nuke?

PhiloBeddo » 01 Apr 2026, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 8:38 pm

How many people would die if Iran gets a nuke?

0 Americans. So why give a ****?

Vegas » 01 Apr 2026, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 8:03 pm

Ok first...I am highly insulted that you would compare me to BV about anything. That's low. That is just low. 

If they get a nuke, they can't reach us. They just can't. They can reach Israel just fine, but so? That is their problem.

There's lots of ways to send a radioactive cloud.

btw
The comparison to BlaVe was just a coincidental feature that everyone is capable of but his very existence depends on it. You breathe, he breathes. Just a coincidence.  
I meant no harm.
 

Vegas » 01 Apr 2026, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 8:41 pm

0 Americans. So why give a ****?

How many have died without them having a nuke?

You can ascertain the stupidity of your remark by checking out who liked it....it's a good barometer, like an ignorance meter.

Vegas » 01 Apr 2026, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 7:04 pm

Since most of you are defending Trump in this war, I am curious to see how many US soldiers you believe are worth dying for it.

What is the value of life when ancestors cannot even describe why they exist in plain sight and how each is existing one at a time at the same time alive since added into their specific time equally here?

Honesty is the best policy, reality isn't honest about time alive since conception. Truth is relative to ideology factualized cradle to grave.

RebelGator » 01 Apr 2026, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 7:39 pm

The sacrifice soldiers make to safeguard American citizens against a nuclear bomb attack should not be politicized, and Israelis are helping to reduce the  toll resulting from it.

You're a **** idiot.


 

DeezerShoove » 01 Apr 2026, 8:00 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 8:00 pm

Since the biggest argument against the war is Israel's involvement,
one can assume your version of a "correct" answer is none.

I once got into it with CP and he made a statement about "an honest question" with which I tend to agree.
I asked what he meant by that comment regardless to see what he would say.
He said it was a leading question or one you already know the answer to but are trying to trap the other guy.
It is what BlaVe does every time he posts.

Your last choice in your poll is a perfect example that gives it away.

What if, hypothetically, someone doesn't care who helps us, but thinks the Iranians
will never stop trying until they get it?  The nuke.

**** as the Israeli government is, would that taint "the mission" enough to oblige you to be against the action?
Consequently any person who believed in that hypothetical would be considered a naive boob and ignored.

Just thought I'd ask...

Vegas » 01 Apr 2026, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 8:03 pm

Ok first...I am highly insulted that you would compare me to BV about anything. That's low. That is just low.     

If they get a nuke, they can't reach us. They just can't. They can reach Israel just fine, but so? That is their problem.

Very short sighted…
 

DeezerShoove » 01 Apr 2026, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 9:15 pm

There's lots of ways to send a radioactive cloud.

btw
The comparison to BlaVe was just a coincidental feature that everyone is capable of but his very existence depends on it. You breathe, he breathes. Just a coincidence.  
I meant no harm.

Correct…drift is not a good thing…

the correlation exists, regardless of the comparison…
 

DeezerShoove » 01 Apr 2026, 8:00 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 8:00 pm

Since the biggest argument against the war is Israel's involvement,
one can assume your version of a "correct" answer is none.

I once got into it with CP and he made a statement about "an honest question" with which I tend to agree.
I asked what he meant by that comment regardless to see what he would say.
He said it was a leading question or one you already know the answer to but are trying to trap the other guy.
It is what BlaVe does every time he posts.

Your last choice in your poll is a perfect example that gives it away.

What if, hypothetically, someone doesn't care who helps us, but thinks the Iranians
will never stop trying until they get it?  The nuke.

**** as the Israeli government is, would that taint "the mission" enough to oblige you to be against the action?
Consequently any person who believed in that hypothetical would be considered a naive boob and ignored.

Just thought I'd ask...

He said it was a leading question or one you already know the answer to but are trying to trap the other guy.
 It is what BlaVe does every time he posts.

Must everything exist in a context of your debilitating bitterness? 
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 7:26 am

Must everything exist in a context of your debilitating bitterness?

Sure. Why not?

Anyway, do you have a real comment or simply your typical whiny crap?

DeezerShoove » 02 Apr 2026, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 8:23 am

Sure. Why not?

Anyway, do you have a real comment or simply your typical whiny crap?

Sure...why not?

**** idiot.


@RebelGator  is an imbecile.

His post is masturbatory crap..


Is that clear?



 

RebelGator » 02 Apr 2026, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 6:29 am

How many have died without them having a nuke?

You can ascertain the stupidity of your remark by checking out who liked it....it's a good barometer, like an ignorance meter.

0 Americans. So why care?

Vegas » 01 Apr 2026, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 7:04 pm

Since most of you are defending Trump in this war, I am curious to see how many US soldiers you believe are worth dying for it.

Reframing the question:

How many US Soldiers should die to stop the raping and mutilation of 9 year old girls and free 40 million women from bondage?

Answer: As many as it takes!