Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 7:09 am

Ms. Bondi has been contacting committee Republicans — including Representative Michael Cloud of Texas — hoping to address their concerns without having to do so under oath.

The AG of the US would prefer not to be obliged to be truthful. Kinda like Grafty...

But Hand Job's got her back...

Several lawmakers who voted for the subpoena have softened their resolve, including Representatives Lauren Boebert of Colorado and Tim Burchett of Tennessee. 
“A.G. Bondi has been far more communicative with Congress than her predecessors, and we’re supportive of her leadership,” Speaker Mike Johnson said in a statement.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/01/us/p ... trump.html

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...