Liberal Forum

Vegas » 02 Apr 2026, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 2:50 pm

I said before that women just don't make good leaders. They shouldn't be in these kind of positions. Noem and Bondi are out. I am sure Leavitt will be next. What Trump was thinking by putting women in these positions is beyond me. 

US President Donald Trump fires US attorney general Pam Bondi - BBC News

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

Vegas » 02 Apr 2026, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 2:50 pm

I said before that women just don't make good leaders. They shouldn't be in these kind of positions. Noem and Bondi are out. I am sure Leavitt will be next. What Trump was thinking by putting women in these positions is beyond me. 

US President Donald Trump fires US attorney general Pam Bondi - BBC News

What Trump was thinking by putting women in these positions is beyond me. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2026, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 7:15 am

Only because you're a ******* goat ****.

Pete Hegseth is far less qualified for his gig than Pam was for hers...

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

DeezerShoove » 03 Apr 2026, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 6:22 am

4 minute vid.
AG should be two separate jobs? Never thought of that before.

https://rumble.com/v77z5t6-attorney-gen ... acros.html

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 02 Apr 2026, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 2:50 pm

I said before that women just don't make good leaders. They shouldn't be in these kind of positions. Noem and Bondi are out. I am sure Leavitt will be next. What Trump was thinking by putting women in these positions is beyond me. 

US President Donald Trump fires US attorney general Pam Bondi - BBC News

Vegas » 03 Apr 2026, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:01 am

Speaking of you being less qualified, check this out: 


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2026, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:05 am

Party's over..

Talk to your fellow slack jawed rube, bucknekkid...

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 03 Apr 2026, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:07 am

Nope. It's over when you answer with your defense. 


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2026, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:07 am

To whom need I defend it?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 03 Apr 2026, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:08 am

Another **** question. God man. You never stop **** hiding. 

1. Continue to evade by question/demand...as always.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2026, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:07 am

To whom need I defend it?

murdock » 03 Apr 2026, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:11 am

Your mother and her orange toy horse peter!

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:10 am

Your question was just answered.

 

1. Geee...I wonder what's next. It couldn't be the same redundant lie over and over and over and over again, could it?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 03 Apr 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:14 am

Annnnnd there is the same lie that I just predicted two posts ago. 100% accuracy. QED

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2026, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:15 am

Post my lie, in my words.

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
7 minutes ago
Your question was just answered.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 03 Apr 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:18 am

I was literally going to predict this, but I forgot to post it.             

One post ago you dumb mother ****. Do you remember this from not even 5 minutes ago?

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2026, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:24 am

I show you that I posted the answer to the question and you set your head on fire.

Deal?

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer, by quoting me directly, the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 03 Apr 2026, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2026, 10:31 am

Seriously, because I have been trying to get you to do that for 6 months. I even give you this deal every single time I post it.