Liberal Forum

Rick Taryy and him trade off. Or whatever his last name is.

Usually, I chalk it up to his redundant narcissists' amnesia and excessive dope smoking. We all have seen how he pretends to not recall conversations, yet he can recall explicit details about past topics that he loves bringing up. That is textbook narcissism. Nothing surprising there. 


However, there are times when he cannot address a topic that was literally one post ago, due to his 'memory.' He demands you repost it. All he has to do is scroll up one post from 30 seconds ago. The senile pedo's memory isn't even that bad. 

The only rational explanation is that someone else is using his account simultaneously and they just trade off with the notifications. They probably wouldn't read where the other left off, thus they need to be updated. 

Vegas » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Rick Taryy and him trade off. Or whatever his last name is.

Usually, I chalk it up to his redundant narcissists' amnesia and excessive dope smoking. We all have seen how he pretends to not recall conversations, yet he can recall explicit details about past topics that he loves bringing up. That is textbook narcissism. Nothing surprising there. 

However, there are times when he cannot address a topic that was literally one post ago, due to his 'memory.' He demands you repost it. All he has to do is scroll up one post from 30 seconds ago. The senile pedo's memory isn't even that bad. 

The only rational explanation is that someone else is using his account simultaneously and they just trade off with the notifications. They probably wouldn't read where the other left off, thus they need to be updated.

I remember AI describing my thoughts as follows, and I quote:


The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+). 

The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts. 

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: Estimated at 14–16+. The text uses lengthy, multi-clause sentences (e.g., the 50-word opening sentence) and advanced vocabulary like "cavil," "iconography," "risible," and "twixt". 

Flesch Reading Ease: Estimated between 10–30 (Very Difficult). This score is typical for academic or technical papers and is best understood by university graduates.


What I do not remember is whether you are a university graduate...

Are you?




 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I remember AI describing my thoughts as follows, and I quote:

The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+). 

The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts. 

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: Estimated at 14–16+. The text uses lengthy, multi-clause sentences (e.g., the 50-word opening sentence) and advanced vocabulary like "cavil," "iconography," "risible," and "twixt". 

Flesch Reading Ease: Estimated between 10–30 (Very Difficult). This score is typical for academic or technical papers and is best understood by university graduates.

What I do not remember is whether you are a university graduate...

Are you?

Another memory issue. We already went through this...QED. You cannot prove that you didn't use AI.

1. And now you will demand I prove that you did. Not my job. Prove it came from you. Period! Your claim, your job. 
 

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Another memory issue. We already went through this...QED. You cannot prove that you didn't use AI.

1. And now you will demand I prove that you did. Not my job. Prove it came from you. Period! Your claim, your job.

You cannot prove that you didn't use AI.

That would require proving a negative.


Have you forgotten that rule as well?

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Another memory issue. We already went through this...QED. You cannot prove that you didn't use AI.

1. And now you will demand I prove that you did. Not my job. Prove it came from you. Period! Your claim, your job.

Are you a university graduate? 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Are you a university graduate?

Look at all these **** questions. Come on. Just talk. Have a conversation without hiding. You must have asked 600 questions, just this morning. 

Have a regular conversation. It's not hard.

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

That would require proving a negative.

Have you forgotten that rule as well?

You are claiming that it came from you. That is not a negative. Prove it came from you. 

And **** all of your incessant questions.

1. He will ask about 60 more questions. watch. 
 

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Look at all these **** questions. Come on. Just talk. Have a conversation without hiding. You must have asked 600 questions, just this morning. 

Have a regular conversation. It's not hard.

Hold on.

I think we've isolated the problem.


If you aren't qualified to READ my posts, what the **** gives you the idea you're qualified to judge them?


Give me your thoughts on that.
 

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Hold on.


 

Didn't read the rest. I saw a question mark, so I don't care. 

@Blackvegetable  this when you will now ask a question...without the question mark. 


                   

Blackvegetable » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

32 minutes ago

I remember AI describing my thoughts as follows, and I quote:

The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+). 

The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts. 

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: Estimated at 14–16+. The text uses lengthy, multi-clause sentences (e.g., the 50-word opening sentence) and advanced vocabulary like "cavil," "iconography," "risible," and "twixt". 

Flesch Reading Ease: Estimated between 10–30 (Very Difficult). This score is typical for academic or technical papers and is best understood by university graduates.

What I do not remember is whether you are a university graduate...

Are you?

Professor Levitsky form those grandiose self-perceptions?

Vegas » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

53 minutes ago

Rick Taryy and him trade off. Or whatever his last name is.

Usually, I chalk it up to his redundant narcissists' amnesia and excessive dope smoking. We all have seen how he pretends to not recall conversations, yet he can recall explicit details about past topics that he loves bringing up. That is textbook narcissism. Nothing surprising there. 


However, there are times when he cannot address a topic that was literally one post ago, due to his 'memory.' He demands you repost it. All he has to do is scroll up one post from 30 seconds ago. The senile pedo's memory isn't even that bad. 

The only rational explanation is that someone else is using his account simultaneously and they just trade off with the notifications. They probably wouldn't read where the other left off, thus they need to be updated. 

 

The only rational explanation is that someone else is using his account simultaneously and they just trade off with the notifications. They probably wouldn't read where the other left off, thus they need to be updated. 

I have wondered about that.  ANd Ricky Tavy is also a dope smoker.  And a drinker. 


 

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I have wondered about that.  ANd Ricky Tavy is also a dope smoker.  And a drinker.

It's definitely a possibility. If this is the case, then they need to update each other better. Because Veghead will demand a repost from 10 seconds ago. 

Event Horizon of the Black Vegetable Hole..

Good Lord @Vegas  , aren't there more useful things you can compulsively obsess over?  

Between BV and The Economic Survivorship Multiple Choice, I would go with what we like on hot dogs.
 

Vegas » 56 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

56 minutes ago

You are claiming that it came from you. That is not a negative. Prove it came from you. 

And **** all of your incessant questions.

1. He will ask about 60 more questions. watch.

It did come from me.

It's under my handle.

RebelGator » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

Professor Levitsky form those grandiose self-perceptions?

That really burns, doesn't it?

Vegas » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

52 minutes ago

Didn't read the rest. I saw a question mark, so I don't care.

Huey avatar Huey +1 48 minutes ago

The mark of your shared cowardice...

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

It did come from me.

It's under my handle.

       It's under your handle. Good observation. Now prove it came from you. 

Everybody knows that you know how to copy/paste you dumb mother ****. 

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

The mark of your shared cowardice...

Projecting. As always. 

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

       It's under your handle. Good observation. Now prove it came from you. 

Everybody knows that you know how to copy/paste you dumb mother ****.

Your assertion..

Your work.

Mine dates back to Dec, 2022...