Liberal Forum

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 10:56 am

Look at all these **** questions. Come on. Just talk. Have a conversation without hiding. You must have asked 600 questions, just this morning. 

Have a regular conversation. It's not hard.

Huey avatar Huey +2 55 minutes ago

Neither of you are even qualified to read it...

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 11:59 am

Neither of you are even qualified to read it...

Same cop-out. Always the same cop-out. Every time. 

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 11:57 am

Your assertion..

Your work.
 

You claimed it came from you. Your job. How many **** times...
1. As alwys, you will refuse to prove your claim
2. Turn it on me...as aalways.

Mine dates back to Dec, 2022...

And again. We went through this already. Sigggghhhhhhh......Do you not remember "challenge"?

You know it came before Nov 2022. 

1. You will now pretend that you don't remember and demand I "prove it."


So **** predictable. Always the same ****.
 

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:03 pm

You claimed it came from you. 

No...
I assert authorship.

You're challenging it.

Your job.

@Deezer Shoove  I know I will get in trouble for this, but @Blackvegetable  is out of control with his questions/demands again. Not to mention his redundancy. It's normal for him to be this way, but today he is really out there with it all. Far more than usual. 

If you need to ban for a day or two, then I understand. That's fine. But he needs to get a hold of himself. So, I will be spamming and trashing the **** out of his threads. 

Just an FYI. 

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:05 pm

No...
I assert authorship.

 

Yes. So prove your assertion you dumb mother ****.


Your self-discovery companion

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:06 pm

@Deezer Shoove  I know I will get in trouble for this, but @Blackvegetable  is out of control with his questions/demands again. Not to mention his redundancy. It's normal for him to be this way, but today he is really out there with it all. Far more than usual. 

If you need to ban for a day or two, then I understand. That's fine. But he needs to get a hold of himself. So, I will be spamming and trashing the **** out of his threads. 

Just an FYI.

You don't get in trouble for your narcissistic tantrums...don't be silly...

Coozie is only bothered if she gets splashed...

There's a lot of subjective here

"Out of control"

"redundancy"


"demands"


"normal"

"really out there"...


No one should take the word of a goat **** christian.
 

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:06 pm

Yes. So prove your assertion you dumb mother ****.


 

Do you see anyone else's signature attached to it?

**** idiot.

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:03 pm

You claimed it came from you. Your job. 

I did my job.

I wrote it and signed it.

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 10:47 am

I remember AI describing my thoughts as follows, and I quote:

The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+). 

The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts. 

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: Estimated at 14–16+. The text uses lengthy, multi-clause sentences (e.g., the 50-word opening sentence) and advanced vocabulary like "cavil," "iconography," "risible," and "twixt". 

Flesch Reading Ease: Estimated between 10–30 (Very Difficult). This score is typical for academic or technical papers and is best understood by university graduates.

What I do not remember is whether you are a university graduate...

Are you?

Lol you're just another lying leftist cocksucker!

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:12 pm

I did my job.

I wrote it and signed it.

                     
God. You really are this dumb. So, here is your proof:
Veghead said he wrote it because he signed it...therefore, he wrote it....because he said so.

You do realize that if I used that, then you wouldn't accept it. Right?

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:11 pm

Do you see anyone else's signature attached to it?

**** idiot.

I saw a question mark. Didn't read it. 

1. Ask a question without the question mark
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:10 pm

You don't get in trouble for your narcissistic tantrums...don't be silly...

 

Damn...you wrote a lot...that I didn't read, because you are always full of **** anyway.     

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:12 pm

I did my job.

I wrote it and signed it.

I can't get over this level of stupid. I just can't.

 AI said it "reads at a graduate level” is not the flex you think it is. AI can rate writing difficulty. It cannot magically verify that you wrote it just because you slapped your name on it.

All you proved is that someone wrote a paragraph AI thinks sounds college-level. That is not the same as proving it was you.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 10:47 am

I remember AI describing my thoughts as follows, and I quote:


The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+). 

The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts. 

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: Estimated at 14–16+. The text uses lengthy, multi-clause sentences (e.g., the 50-word opening sentence) and advanced vocabulary like "cavil," "iconography," "risible," and "twixt". 

Flesch Reading Ease: Estimated between 10–30 (Very Difficult). This score is typical for academic or technical papers and is best understood by university graduates.


What I do not remember is whether you are a university graduate...

Are you?

Anything translated about evolving evolving in series parallel time displaced cannot be written in kinetic timing of details never duplicated twice inhabiting space now.

periodic elements and ancestral positions are both changing form as shaped here now in contracting wavelengths of spontaneously here simultaneously existing in plain sight at the same time.

Intellectual minds have to work in single topic, individual parts of the whole process specifically spread geographically here on a rotating planet translated by longitudes(vertical 15 degrees increments sustaining the 24 time zones) latitudes being 15 degrees of temperate zones between one equator between two polar axis with opposite season same rotation of the planet where dawn and dusk are half way between noon and midnight/AM and PM governing people dawn to dusk each rotation having 2 calendar days going forward now.

Which two days of 7 exist between yesterday, today, and tomorrow midnight to noon and noon to midnight, dawn to dusk? Perpetual balancing universe self contains every details evolving forward in the moment here geologically, geometrically, geographically, genetically alive so far.

Self evident results or there wouldn't be ancestries pretending now isn't eternity daily here.

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:28 pm

I can't get over this level of stupid. I just can't.

 AI said it "reads at a graduate level” is not the flex you think it is. AI can rate writing difficulty. It cannot magically verify that you wrote it just because you slapped your name on it.

All you proved is that someone wrote a paragraph AI thinks sounds college-level. That is not the same as proving it was you.

AI said it "reads at a graduate level” is not the flex you think it is.

So YOU are going to presume to explain it...

:rofl:  

AI can rate writing difficulty. It cannot magically verify that you wrote it just because you slapped your name on it.

That is not my job.

Any implication that I didn't MUST be informed by evidence.


Putting my name on it says it is me until you can provide reason to believe otherwise.

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 1:37 pm

That is not my job.

 

           

Yes. Dumb ***. It is. 

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:12 pm

I did my job.

I wrote it and signed it.

I refuse to let this level of stupid go. I am going to milk this one.       

"I signed it."     Good for you. As if it's impossible to sign any paragraph written by anyone. 

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 12:12 pm

I did my job.

I wrote it and signed it.

Hey, I just signed Lincoln's Gettysburg address. That is indisputable proof that I wrote it. 


You dumb piece of dog ****.                   

Oh man. I can't let you off the hook for this one. 

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 1:47 pm

Hey, I just signed Lincoln's Gettysburg address. That is indisputable proof that I wrote it. 

You dumb piece of dog ****.                   

Oh man. I can't let you off the hook for this one.

whose Gettysburg Address? 


Damn, are you **** stupid.