Liberal Forum

A new Kansas law will allow college students to sue their schools for free-speech violations. In Tennessee, a new law will encourage teachers and professors to include “the positive impacts of religion” in American history courses.The common factor: Both are being done in the name of Charlie Kirk.

Of course the new laws are being contested by liberal democrats, the greatest threat America is facing.

Democrats need to be removed from our world. Isolated...

RebelGator » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

A new Kansas law will allow college students to sue their schools for free-speech violations. In Tennessee, a new law will encourage teachers and professors to include “the positive impacts of religion” in American history courses.The common factor: Both are being done in the name of Charlie Kirk.

Of course the new laws are being contested by liberal democrats, the greatest threat America is facing.

wow..

How aspirational...

Honoring yet another white guy who couldn't hack college...

RebelGator » Today, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:25 am

A new Kansas law will allow college students to sue their schools for free-speech violations. In Tennessee, a new law will encourage teachers and professors to include “the positive impacts of religion” in American history courses.The common factor: Both are being done in the name of Charlie Kirk.

Of course the new laws are being contested by liberal democrats, the greatest threat America is facing.

Stupid law needs repealed faster than it took to legislate it.

murdock » Today, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:27 am

Democrats need to be removed from our world. Isolated...

no isolation needed….just removed…IE, be sure to call 811 before you dig…
 

ROG62 » 50 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

50 minutes ago

no isolation needed….just removed…IE, be sure to call 811 before you dig…

 

31stArrival » Today, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:30 am

Stupid law needs repealed faster than it took to legislate it.

Hate speech laws are way worse.

RebelGator » Today, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:25 am

A new Kansas law will allow college students to sue their schools for free-speech violations. In Tennessee, a new law will encourage teachers and professors to include “the positive impacts of religion” in American history courses.The common factor: Both are being done in the name of Charlie Kirk.

Of course the new laws are being contested by liberal democrats, the greatest threat America is facing.

Do it come with a Shyt Brown Trump Bible?

If we act in the next 15 minutes do we get a free pair of golden sneakers with every lawsuit?
 

DeezerShoove » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Hate speech laws are way worse.

do you mean all those laws you cant talk about genocide in gaza?

DeezerShoove » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Hate speech laws are way worse.

-------------------------------------

There is no room for antisemitism on campus or anywhere else. But to make it illegal for college students to disagree with the government of Israel violates the principle of freedom of speech. Perhaps more importantly, it also distracts us from the real and ongoing harassment and discrimination against dissenters from all backgrounds of U.S. and Israeli actions — Muslim, Jewish, Arab and others.

Deezer Shoove » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

Hate speech laws are way worse.

Rule of law regardless the alternate reality of humanity staging social events globally here 24/7 is hate speech because every character of reality demands every ancestor ignore how they got here genetically in real time evolving so far.

jerra b » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

do you mean all those laws you cant talk about genocide in gaza?

which one in history so far? I am talking about the real estate only named the Gaza Strip since 1949. Gee a year after Israel was geographically named.

you really ignore how evolving actually happens 24/7 from personal experience evolved since a fertilized cell, yourself equally timed apart by heart beats going forward now.

jerrab » Today, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:38 am

do you mean all those laws you cant talk about genocide in gaza?

Huh?

DeezerShoove » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Huh?

dont play dumb that is sole's job.

anyone criticizing israel for any reason is against the laws trump created and that includes the israel genocide in gaza.

DeezerShoove » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

Huh?

https://palestinelegal.org/news/trump-eo-january-2025
Palestine Legal: Trump's Executive Order Aims to Punish Protests of Israel's Genocide in Gaza, Promotes Anti-Palestinian DiscriminationJanuary 30, 2025  CONTACT: Palestine Legal Media | media@palestinelegal.org January 30th, 2025 — Yesterday, Donald Trump signed an executive order targeting university students who participate in protests or speech activity critical of Israel's genocide. The order reaffirms and expands on Trump’s 2019 executive order that directed government agencies to consider the distorted and politiciz
 

////////////////The January 29th executive order directs government agencies to report on possible civil and criminal actions they can take "to curb or combat antisemitism." It also calls on government agencies to recommend trainings for universities to be able to identify, monitor, and report on non-citizen students and staff based on broadly defined security-related inadmissibility grounds, including any "unlawful activity." Its wider impact will be to sow a climate of fear and suspicion on campus, and to chill speech critical of Israel or supportive of Palestinian rights. Alongside ongoing efforts by the government to strong-arm universities into policing and punishing Palestine scholarship and activism, this new Trump directive aims to further co-opt universities as arms of the surveillance state and will disproportionately impact Palestinian, Arab, Muslim and other students of color.
 

jerra b » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

dont play dumb that is sole's job.

anyone criticizing israel for any reason is against the laws trump created and that includes the israel genocide in gaza.

Israel is just ancestral lineages pretending Jewish people are their God's chosen ancestries to inherit the earth. Christianity follows Jesus that denounced his own religion to follow genetic patterns of evolving in plain sight using a little orient philosophy he learned about going up.

Rome was paganistic like Greece and barbarians to the northern colder temperate zones.

Every time ancestries change the name of their country or religion the New World order sustains reasonable doubt forward daily here each generation forward, now..

jerrab » Today, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:26 pm

https://palestinelegal.org/news/trump-eo-january-2025
Palestine Legal: Trump's Executive Order Aims to Punish Protests of Israel's Genocide in Gaza, Promotes Anti-Palestinian DiscriminationJanuary 30, 2025  CONTACT: Palestine Legal Media | media@palestinelegal.org January 30th, 2025 — Yesterday, Donald Trump signed an executive order targeting university students who participate in protests or speech activity critical of Israel's genocide. The order reaffirms and expands on Trump’s 2019 executive order that directed government agencies to consider the distorted and politiciz

Section 4 says the XO stays within current law and does not extend any benefit or right to any particular group or person.

So, I guess it's a yawner...

DeezerShoove » 43 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

43 minutes ago

Section 4 says the XO stays within current law and does not extend any benefit or right to any particular group or person.

So, I guess it's a yawner...

 
Sec. 4.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect
(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party--- against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
 

jerrab » Today, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:42 pm

 
Sec. 4.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect
(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party--- against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Yup. A yawner.