Liberal Forum

The allegations include claims that Chavez-DeRemer, a former Oregon congresswoman, drank on the job in her Washington, D.C., office and had an affair with one of her bodyguards. 

Chavez-DeRemer’s senior aides, as well as her husband and father, had also come under investigation after they allegedly sent personal messages and made personal requests of young staff members in creepy texts, The New York Times reported last week.

.....

The allegations of misconduct under Chavez-DeRemer’s tenure at the labor department are extensive and multifaceted. 

In January, a complaint alleged that she had been “abusing her position” by engaging in a relationship with a subordinate, her bodyguard. Brian Sloan, a member of the secretary’s security detail, was temporarily suspended from his duties pending an investigation into the allegations. He eventually quit his position in March.

In February, the secretary’s husband of more than three decades, Dr. Shawn DeRemer, was banned from entering the Labor Department headquarters after being accused by two female staffers of inappropriate touching. DeRemer, 57, has denied all allegations. 

Earlier this month, three staff members filed formal civil rights complaints against Chavez-DeRemer, accusing her of fostering a toxic workplace and retaliating against women who came forward with sexual misconduct allegations against her husband. The complainants also described fearing retaliation for pushing back against directives and alleged misuse of official resources.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/female-ca ... x-scandal/

 
It's not as if we weren't warned that legalizing gay marriage would undermine traditional unions...

Blackvegetable » 20 Apr 2026, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2026, 7:36 pm

It's not as if we weren't warned that legalizing gay marriage would undermine traditional unions...

This is your idea level 2 + ?  Pound sand with that noise. 

Go back  and research what level 2 means. Moron.

Blackvegetable » 20 Apr 2026, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2026, 7:36 pm

The allegations include claims that Chavez-DeRemer, a former Oregon congresswoman, drank on the job in her Washington, D.C., office and had an affair with one of her bodyguards. 

Chavez-DeRemer’s senior aides, as well as her husband and father, had also come under investigation after they allegedly sent personal messages and made personal requests of young staff members in creepy texts, The New York Times reported last week.

.....

The allegations of misconduct under Chavez-DeRemer’s tenure at the labor department are extensive and multifaceted. 

In January, a complaint alleged that she had been “abusing her position” by engaging in a relationship with a subordinate, her bodyguard. Brian Sloan, a member of the secretary’s security detail, was temporarily suspended from his duties pending an investigation into the allegations. He eventually quit his position in March.

In February, the secretary’s husband of more than three decades, Dr. Shawn DeRemer, was banned from entering the Labor Department headquarters after being accused by two female staffers of inappropriate touching. DeRemer, 57, has denied all allegations. 

Earlier this month, three staff members filed formal civil rights complaints against Chavez-DeRemer, accusing her of fostering a toxic workplace and retaliating against women who came forward with sexual misconduct allegations against her husband. The complainants also described fearing retaliation for pushing back against directives and alleged misuse of official resources.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/female-ca ... x-scandal/

It's not as if we weren't warned that legalizing gay marriage would undermine traditional unions...

Too bad for them that they weren't gay or touching young children.....their escapades would never have been noticed  and reported by **** like yourself. 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 5:23 am

Demonstrate a Level 1 grasp of the OP..

Then defend it.

Demonstrate your level 1 thoughts of your own about your own OP. 

1. Same ****...continue with the same ****...still won't provide any thoughts of your own...ever. At all.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 9:50 am

You first, Welshy...

Your OP. Your job. Welshy. 

Feel Lighter in Therapy

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 9:59 am

Demonstrate that you understand what it concerns....

Demonstrate that you have thoughts of your own about what it concerns. 

My response is never going to change, so figure it out. 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 10:03 am

I don't care.

If you have no idea what I'm talking about, that is your problem not my burden.

You can't even prove that you know what you are talking about. 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 10:51 am

To whom?

     

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 10:53 am

Exactly.

Still don't see your thoughts. 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 11:01 am

Not my job to read the OP and understand it for you.

It is your job to provide thoughts of your own on your own **** OP. 


 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 11:12 am

You wouldn't know.

It's your job to learn enough to reach Level 1.

 "Social Promotion for Some Idiot's Self Esteem" plays no part in Bloom's Taxonomy..

Your op, your job. 

(1100) Why do you always need to repeat yourself to narcissists? - YouTube

Introducing Base44’s Big Game Full Ad “It’s App to You”
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 11:14 am

your Level 1.

Your job.

Your Op, your job. 

↓Why do you always need to repeat yourself to narcissists?


↓Introducing Base44’s Big Game Full Ad “It’s App to You”

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 11:14 am

I am terrified to express my thoughts on anything.

You do realize that you are trashing the shot out of your own OP., right? 

You aren't saying anything meaningful. Just showing your cowardice post after post. Your thread is now a joke.         

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 2:57 am

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 11:57 am

The OP has nothing to do with what's "actionable"..

Your comment is irrelevant

@Huey  is a rat..  He is here for your wood fired pizza.

I wish Doordash Grandma had grabbed him by the balls.

Tramp Grandma's For Trump..

 

At least have the balls to look at my first post concerning the OP and tell me what is wrong with it.  Oh, and by the way, yesterday he called you a *******.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 1:46 pm

Huey » 21 Apr 2026, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 1:40 pm

At least have the balls to look at my first post concerning the OP and tell me what is wrong with it.  Oh, and by the way, yesterday he called you a *******.

What's with the double vague description? 

Search is working.
 

 

I commented strictly on what you posted in the OP.  I took a stand on each allegation.  As your usual you try to move the goal post.  I am done with you unless you wish to discuss what I posted.  And I am Leary of you once again using PG.  

Huey » 21 Apr 2026, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 2:15 pm

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 1:46 pm

Huey » 21 Apr 2026, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 1:40 pm

At least have the balls to look at my first post concerning the OP and tell me what is wrong with it.  Oh, and by the way, yesterday he called you a *******.

What's with the double vague description? 

Search is working.
 


 

I commented strictly on what you posted in the OP.  I took a stand on each allegation.  As your usual you try to move the goal post.  I am done with you unless you wish to discuss what I posted.  And I am Leary of you once again using PG.  

 

@Blackvegetable  

Once again you acted like a ****** and abused PG.  I am done with this topic.

Yu know my address, or have it saved.  Coe find it and I will explain it to your ****** ***, Princess.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 2:33 pm

Huey » 21 Apr 2026, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 2:15 pm

I commented strictly on what you posted in the OP.  I took a stand on each allegation.  As your usual you try to move the goal post.  I am done with you unless you wish to discuss what I posted.  And I am Leary of you once again using PG.

You did not address the point of the OP..

Again, it is not about any potential crimes...

It's about the Party of Family Values Posturing...
 

 

I addressed what you wrote in the OP you ****** Princess.  I am done with this thread.  You know where to find me.  Remember, unlike yuo I am not anonymous to you.

Blackvegetable » 20 Apr 2026, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2026, 7:36 pm

The allegations include claims that Chavez-DeRemer, a former Oregon congresswoman, drank on the job in her Washington, D.C., office and had an affair with one of her bodyguards. 

Chavez-DeRemer’s senior aides, as well as her husband and father, had also come under investigation after they allegedly sent personal messages and made personal requests of young staff members in creepy texts, The New York Times reported last week.

.....

The allegations of misconduct under Chavez-DeRemer’s tenure at the labor department are extensive and multifaceted. 

In January, a complaint alleged that she had been “abusing her position” by engaging in a relationship with a subordinate, her bodyguard. Brian Sloan, a member of the secretary’s security detail, was temporarily suspended from his duties pending an investigation into the allegations. He eventually quit his position in March.

In February, the secretary’s husband of more than three decades, Dr. Shawn DeRemer, was banned from entering the Labor Department headquarters after being accused by two female staffers of inappropriate touching. DeRemer, 57, has denied all allegations. 

Earlier this month, three staff members filed formal civil rights complaints against Chavez-DeRemer, accusing her of fostering a toxic workplace and retaliating against women who came forward with sexual misconduct allegations against her husband. The complainants also described fearing retaliation for pushing back against directives and alleged misuse of official resources.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/female-ca ... x-scandal/

It's not as if we weren't warned that legalizing gay marriage would undermine traditional unions...

Dang! I had no idea your mom was a Trump tramp! Does she take it in the *** like you do, ***?

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 6:08 pm

No, you didn't..

You cherry picked items from the citation, paying no attention whatsoever to the point of the OP.

You are actually..

**** you ya lying dick smoking traitor bastard.

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 2:36 pm

Call him Monica...

Call you lying traitor *** bastard!