JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ROG62 » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ California Gov. Gavin Newsom is facing yet another scandal - this time involving alleged corruption tied to $20 million in taxpayer money, which is being used to fund the state’s new “free diapers” initiative. Here’s the kicker: the eight-figure deal involves a nonprofit led by a woman associated with Newsom’s wife.
Just before Mother’s Day, Newsom announced a first-of-its-kind state program that provides newborns with 400 free diapers before they leave the hospital. The Golden State is working with Baby2Baby, a nonprofit that provides diapers, clothing, and other basic necessities to children in need across the nation.
Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton slammed the program’s allegedly wasteful plan: “If you take the number of diapers they’re planning to send out and the amount of money that he’s spending on it, it’s 50 cents for each one, which is like 100 times more expensive if you just bought them in Costco.”
Media Research Center’s Brittany Hughes explained that Baby2Baby’s branded diapers will be used in the program: “Meaning that instead of lowering taxes and letting families keep their own money to buy essentials like diapers, California takes their money, pumps it through a ‘nonprofit’ that has overhead and whose CEO made $240,000 in 2024, to provide a ‘free’ service available only in certain locations, and that you could have bought yourself for much cheaper.”
https://www.libertynation.com/gavin-new ... dium=email
what’s not to loathe?
I'm sure Eggplant has a perfectly valid explanation.DeezerShoove » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ AI says a generic disposable diaper costs $0.10 - $0.15.
The taxpayers are only paying 3 - 5x too much. Such a deal...
Not to those leaving the hospital with 400 diapers …win win…DeezerShoove » 58 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ AI says a generic disposable diaper costs $0.10 - $0.15.
The taxpayers are only paying 3 - 5x too much. Such a deal...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ROG62 » Today, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ California Gov. Gavin Newsom is facing yet another scandal - this time involving alleged corruption tied to $20 million in taxpayer money, which is being used to fund the state’s new “free diapers” initiative. Here’s the kicker: the eight-figure deal involves a nonprofit led by a woman associated with Newsom’s wife.
Just before Mother’s Day, Newsom announced a first-of-its-kind state program that provides newborns with 400 free diapers before they leave the hospital. The Golden State is working with Baby2Baby, a nonprofit that provides diapers, clothing, and other basic necessities to children in need across the nation.
Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton slammed the program’s allegedly wasteful plan: “If you take the number of diapers they’re planning to send out and the amount of money that he’s spending on it, it’s 50 cents for each one, which is like 100 times more expensive if you just bought them in Costco.”
Media Research Center’s Brittany Hughes explained that Baby2Baby’s branded diapers will be used in the program: “Meaning that instead of lowering taxes and letting families keep their own money to buy essentials like diapers, California takes their money, pumps it through a ‘nonprofit’ that has overhead and whose CEO made $240,000 in 2024, to provide a ‘free’ service available only in certain locations, and that you could have bought yourself for much cheaper.”
https://www.libertynation.com/gavin-new ... dium=email
what’s not to loathe?
WTF are you buying diapers for 0.5 cents?ROG62 » Today, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ California Gov. Gavin Newsom is facing yet another scandal - this time involving alleged corruption tied to $20 million in taxpayer money, which is being used to fund the state’s new “free diapers” initiative. Here’s the kicker: the eight-figure deal involves a nonprofit led by a woman associated with Newsom’s wife.
Just before Mother’s Day, Newsom announced a first-of-its-kind state program that provides newborns with 400 free diapers before they leave the hospital. The Golden State is working with Baby2Baby, a nonprofit that provides diapers, clothing, and other basic necessities to children in need across the nation.
Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton slammed the program’s allegedly wasteful plan: “If you take the number of diapers they’re planning to send out and the amount of money that he’s spending on it, it’s 50 cents for each one, which is like 100 times more expensive if you just bought them in Costco.”
Media Research Center’s Brittany Hughes explained that Baby2Baby’s branded diapers will be used in the program: “Meaning that instead of lowering taxes and letting families keep their own money to buy essentials like diapers, California takes their money, pumps it through a ‘nonprofit’ that has overhead and whose CEO made $240,000 in 2024, to provide a ‘free’ service available only in certain locations, and that you could have bought yourself for much cheaper.”
https://www.libertynation.com/gavin-new ... dium=email
what’s not to loathe?
So the guy lied...DeezerShoove » Today, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ AI says a generic disposable diaper costs $0.10 - $0.15.
The taxpayers are only paying 3 - 5x too much. Such a deal...
Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So the guy lied...
Could you post the terms?
Is that delivered?
Beekeeper » Today, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Notice the BOARD DICKSUCKERS, @Blackvegetable ,@Roshambone, to mention the WORST OF THE WORST are running from this.
Same **** MO as always.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Phil, you drive a dump truck. Any profession is "highly successful" in comparisonPhiloBeddo » Today, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ My wife and I have raised two kids and we paid for all their meals, child care, medical, everything, the way it should be. **** all this welfare ****. And both kids are highly successful.
Blackvegetable » Today, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ So the guy lied...
Could you post the terms?
Is that delivered?
---------------------------------------------------------ROG62 » Today, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ California Gov. Gavin Newsom is facing yet another scandal - this time involving alleged corruption tied to $20 million in taxpayer money, which is being used to fund the state’s new “free diapers” initiative. Here’s the kicker: the eight-figure deal involves a nonprofit led by a woman associated with Newsom’s wife.
Just before Mother’s Day, Newsom announced a first-of-its-kind state program that provides newborns with 400 free diapers before they leave the hospital. The Golden State is working with Baby2Baby, a nonprofit that provides diapers, clothing, and other basic necessities to children in need across the nation.
Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton slammed the program’s allegedly wasteful plan: “If you take the number of diapers they’re planning to send out and the amount of money that he’s spending on it, it’s 50 cents for each one, which is like 100 times more expensive if you just bought them in Costco.”
Media Research Center’s Brittany Hughes explained that Baby2Baby’s branded diapers will be used in the program: “Meaning that instead of lowering taxes and letting families keep their own money to buy essentials like diapers, California takes their money, pumps it through a ‘nonprofit’ that has overhead and whose CEO made $240,000 in 2024, to provide a ‘free’ service available only in certain locations, and that you could have bought yourself for much cheaper.”
https://www.libertynation.com/gavin-new ... dium=email
what’s not to loathe?
I've said this before on here, and I'll say it again. Any type of truck driver has more legitimate value in society compared to the majority of professions out there. **** you for thinking otherwise. You have nothing without truck drivers, you stupid ****. Your idea of a legitimate profession is a career politician or worthless government employee who lives on the taxpayers tit.*Roshambo » Today, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Phil, you drive a dump truck. Any profession is "highly successful" in comparison