Liberal Forum

 About nine years ago, I offered @Blackvegetable   a simple challenge: let a moderator choose one random page of his threads and one random page of mine, then count how many opening posts contain actual original thoughts.
Not copy/paste dumps. Not shallow insults. Not calling people “slackjaws” and pretending that counts as analysis. Actual thoughts. Arguments. Ideas.  The winner is whoever has more OPs with original thought. The loser takes one week off. The mods judge. For someone who demands answers to approximately 400,000 questions from everyone else, he has been amazingly shy about accepting one simple challenge about his own content.
So the offer still stands: moderator picks the pages, moderator counts, moderator judges.Who actually thinks, and who just copy/pastes with attitude?


Nine years later, we’re still waiting.

And Veghead, we both know the next stupid comment you will write, so let's just save time now. 

It's impossible for either of us to welch if a mod judges.




How the hell do you not know that and why do you need to be reminded of it so many damn times? 

@Blackvegetable  

Vegas » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

 About nine years ago, I offered @Blackvegetable   a simple challenge: let a moderator choose one random page of his threads and one random page of mine, then count how many opening posts contain actual original thoughts.
Not copy/paste dumps. Not shallow insults. Not calling people “slackjaws” and pretending that counts as analysis. Actual thoughts. Arguments. Ideas.  The winner is whoever has more OPs with original thought. The loser takes one week off. The mods judge. For someone who demands answers to approximately 400,000 questions from everyone else, he has been amazingly shy about accepting one simple challenge about his own content.
So the offer still stands: moderator picks the pages, moderator counts, moderator judges.Who actually thinks, and who just copy/pastes with attitude?

Nine years later, we’re still waiting.

And I've asked you to post something suggesting that you are qualified to "challenge" me...

You've never done so because you are a christian coward. 

 

Vegas » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

And Veghead, we both know the next stupid comment you will write, so let's just save time now. 

It's impossible for either of us to welch if a mod judges.

How the hell do you not know that and why do you need to be reminded of it so many damn times? 

@Blackvegetable

Why should anyone have to read your **** when you refuse to?

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

And I've asked you to post something suggesting that you are qualified to "challenge" me...


 

                                   My qualification is that I can write an original paragraph without needing to staple three insults to someone else’s article and call it analysis.
Now accept the challenge or keep hiding behind the velvet rope of your imaginary intellectual nightclub.

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Why should anyone have to read your **** when you refuse to?

I will not entertain your stalking. 

Savings Wrangler Kitchen 15 HD

Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

                                   My qualification is that I can write an original paragraph without needing to staple three insults to someone else’s article and call it analysis.
Now accept the challenge or keep hiding behind the velvet rope of your imaginary intellectual nightclub.

My qualification is that I can write an original paragraph without needing to staple three insults to someone else’s article and call it analysis.

Prove it.

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I will not entertain your stalking. 


 

Are you asserting that everyone must read your ****....but you don't? 

**** YOU BV YOU *** LIBERAL SHILL

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:55 am

Are you asserting that everyone has to read your ****....but you don't?

I will not entertain your stalking. 

Your self-discovery companion

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:53 am

Prove it.

That's literally the whole point of the challenge. To also prove that you don't. 

God you are dumb as hell. 

BVOCD... again..

Vegas » Today, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:51 pm

That's literally the whole point of the challenge. To also prove that you don't. 

God you are dumb as hell.

There is no "challenge" unless you can establish competence 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:30 pm

There is no "challenge" unless you can establish competence

This again. I will give the same answer: 

My qualification is that I can write an original paragraph without needing to staple three insults to someone else’s article and call it analysis.
Now accept the challenge or keep hiding behind the velvet rope of your imaginary intellectual nightclub.



1. Continue with same cop-out over and over and over and over over and over and over and over over and over and over and over over and over and over and over over and over and over and over over and over and over and over over and over and over and over over and over and over and over over and over and over and over over and over and over and over over and over and over and over......

Vegas » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

This again. I will give the same answer: 

My qualification is that I can write an original paragraph without needing to staple three insults to someone else’s article and call it analysis.

 

Let me reciprocate...

You're not nearly good enough, Palooka.

Thought Challenge.. Now! Not Nine years of multiple choice.. C senior..

Greenland says **** off Jeff Landry

https://youtu.be/ZnG-LO_8pj4?si=ilHQglGZneljB0LZ
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Let me reciprocate...

You're not nearly good enough, Palooka.

He probably  has an eggplant in his sanctuary. 

Obsessed..  The aroma of shyt for thunk..