Liberal Forum

President Donald Trump and his family are being protected from facing any tax audits or penalties for unpaid taxes as part of the settlement after Trump withdrew his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. 

The one-page document signed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was posted one day after the Justice Department revealed the creation of a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, which critics warn will be used to pay out Trump allies with taxpayer dollars. 

The vaguely worded document posted on Tuesday declares the IRS is “FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED” from “prosecuting or pursuing” all claims and “examinations” of Trump or “affiliated individuals” as well as related trusts and businesses.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-giv ... cret-deal/


I mean, it's not like they're  corrupt....



You rubes are so **** g'ddammned stupid 

This one is absolutely insane..
Trump Slushies for all J6r's..
Probably with imported Russian Vodka.

Blackvegetable » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

President Donald Trump and his family are being protected from facing any tax audits or penalties for unpaid taxes as part of the settlement after Trump withdrew his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. 

The one-page document signed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was posted one day after the Justice Department revealed the creation of a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, which critics warn will be used to pay out Trump allies with taxpayer dollars. 

The vaguely worded document posted on Tuesday declares the IRS is “FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED” from “prosecuting or pursuing” all claims and “examinations” of Trump or “affiliated individuals” as well as related trusts and businesses.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-giv ... cret-deal/

I mean, it's not like they're  corrupt....

You rubes are so **** g'ddammned stupid

If this language meant what you dumbasses are claiming every serious outlet including AP Reuters WSJ and Bloomberg would be detonating it across their front pages, but they are not because they understand the difference between a settlement clause and a legal impossibility. The so-called slush fund you bitches are crying about is literally an appropriations line that every administration has and the only reason you think it is some secret corruption pipeline is because you read one partisan article and treated it like gospel without bothering to read past the headline. This stupid **** is not proof of anything except that you did not understand it before calling everyone else stupid.

MR-7 » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

If this language meant what you dumbasses are claiming every serious outlet including AP Reuters WSJ and Bloomberg would be detonating it across their front pages, but they are not because they understand the difference between a settlement clause and a legal impossibility. The so-called slush fund you bitches are crying about is literally an appropriations line that every administration has and the only reason you think it is some secret corruption pipeline is because you read one partisan article and treated it like gospel without bothering to read past the headline. This stupid **** is not proof of anything except that you did not understand it before calling everyone else stupid.

What's interesting is Trump sued the IRS..  essentially he sued himself for $10 Billion.  When it became apparent the case would never fly he offered to "settle" with his own employess to give him 1.776 Billion to do with as he sees fit..   But he can't give it to himself. 

So this is just normal government appropriations?   What the **** have you done to accountability?   That's everyones tax dollars being diverted.

And I guess the top lawyer for the Treasury department, who was appointed 7 months ago,  up and quitting today with absolutely zero words to anyone has nothing to do with it and is just business as usual in The Aprentlicks Oval Cockpit?
 

JohnnyYou » Today, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:34 pm

What's interesting is Trump sued the IRS..  essentially he sued himself for $10 Billion.  When it became apparent the case would never fly he offered to "settle" with his own employess to give him 1.776 Billion to do with as he sees fit..   But he can't give it to himself. 

So this is just normal government appropriations?   What the **** have you done to accountability?   That's everyones tax dollars being diverted.

And I guess the top lawyer for the Treasury department, who was appointed 7 months ago,  up and quitting today with absolutely zero words to anyone, and could end up disbarred and or in prison, has nothing to do with it and is just business as usual in The Aprentlicks Oval Cockpit?

You are not exposing corruption you are exposing that you did not understand a single thing you just posted.
 

MR-7 » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

You are not exposing corruption you are exposing that you did not understand a single thing you just posted.

Fingers in ears..  MAGA LA LA LA LA LA  
 

MR-7 » Today, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:25 pm

If this language meant what you dumbasses are claiming every serious outlet including AP Reuters WSJ and Bloomberg would be detonating it across their front pages, but they are not because they understand the difference between a settlement clause and a legal impossibility. The so-called slush fund you bitches are crying about is literally an appropriations line that every administration has and the only reason you think it is some secret corruption pipeline is because you read one partisan article and treated it like gospel without bothering to read past the headline. This stupid **** is not proof of anything except that you did not understand it before calling everyone else stupid.

What does it mean?

MR-7 » Today, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:25 pm

If this language meant what you dumbasses are claiming every serious outlet including AP Reuters WSJ and Bloomberg would be detonating it across their front pages, but they are not because they understand the difference between a settlement clause and a legal impossibility. The so-called slush fund you bitches are crying about is literally an appropriations line that every administration has and the only reason you think it is some secret corruption pipeline is because you read one partisan article and treated it like gospel without bothering to read past the headline. This stupid **** is not proof of anything except that you did not understand it before calling everyone else stupid.

**** you, Rube....go suck off your husky..

The Justice Department on Tuesday broadened the government’s settlement deal to resolve legal claims brought by President Donald Trump to include a provision that would prevent the IRS from pursuing past tax claims or audits of him, his family or his businesses.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... tion-fund/
 

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

**** you, Rube....go suck off your husky..

The Justice Department on Tuesday broadened the government’s settlement deal to resolve legal claims brought by President Donald Trump to include a provision that would prevent the IRS from pursuing past tax claims or audits of him, his family or his businesses.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... tion-fund/

Did you really think there wouldn't be ramifications from your Trump persecution? You malcontents whined for years about Trump not paying taxes and when he finally released them, there was a big **** sandwich you had to choke down. Democrats have been counter punched and knocked onto queer Street by the President. 

RebelGator » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Did you really think there wouldn't be ramifications from your Trump persecution? 

:rofl:  

Blackvegetable » Today, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:58 pm

President Donald Trump and his family are being protected from facing any tax audits or penalties for unpaid taxes as part of the settlement after Trump withdrew his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. 

The one-page document signed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was posted one day after the Justice Department revealed the creation of a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, which critics warn will be used to pay out Trump allies with taxpayer dollars. 

The vaguely worded document posted on Tuesday declares the IRS is “FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED” from “prosecuting or pursuing” all claims and “examinations” of Trump or “affiliated individuals” as well as related trusts and businesses.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-giv ... cret-deal/

I mean, it's not like they're  corrupt....

You rubes are so **** g'ddammned stupid

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. 


This just proved my latest OP with your level 0 analysis. QED.

I mean, it's not like they're  corrupt....

You rubes are so **** g'ddammned stupid

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=102173

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. 

This just proved my latest OP with your level 0 analysis. QED.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=102173

Compare and contrast


Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump. 
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:58 pm

President Donald Trump and his family are being protected from facing any tax audits or penalties for unpaid taxes as part of the settlement after Trump withdrew his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. 

The one-page document signed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was posted one day after the Justice Department revealed the creation of a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, which critics warn will be used to pay out Trump allies with taxpayer dollars. 

The vaguely worded document posted on Tuesday declares the IRS is “FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED” from “prosecuting or pursuing” all claims and “examinations” of Trump or “affiliated individuals” as well as related trusts and businesses.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-giv ... cret-deal/

I mean, it's not like they're  corrupt....

You rubes are so **** g'ddammned stupid

Stupid is as stupid does, son. I was AT Stoppe ye olde Steal. 

That's affiliation. 

I'm drafting my Dear IRS suck my dick communique AS WE SPEAK.

Man, I have been WAITING to give those **** a piece of my mind. I'm gonna send them my real books and mock the **** out of em, now that I'm off limits.
 
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:56 pm

What does it mean?

It means different things to different people, son.

To me, it means I am now in the driver's seat. The IRS has no jurisdiction over me, as a trump *** ociate. 

To you, it means trump is a crook. 

To "rebel," it means something entirely incomprehensibe to anyone except murdock. 

To Mr.7, it means whatever the mainstream media SAYS it means. He buys his overton windows off the shelf crom CNN.
 
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:21 pm

MR-7 » Yesterday, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:25 pm

If this language meant what you dumbasses are claiming every serious outlet including AP Reuters WSJ and Bloomberg would be detonating it across their front pages, but they are not because they understand the difference between a settlement clause and a legal impossibility. The so-called slush fund you bitches are crying about is literally an appropriations line that every administration has and the only reason you think it is some secret corruption pipeline is because you read one partisan article and treated it like gospel without bothering to read past the headline. This stupid **** is not proof of anything except that you did not understand it before calling everyone else stupid.

**** you, Rube....go suck off your husky.. 

 

Rosh-e-Poo's wife takes care of that.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:31 pm

Compare and contrast

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump. 

Yet, you still can't debunk. it..... "Same eyes"   "To which thread are you referring?"   Tere are your compare and contrast. 

Copies me. No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. 




1. Continue to prove my claim...no thoughts of his own.
 

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Yet, you still can't debunk. it..... "Same eyes"   "To which thread are you referring?"   Tere are your compare and contrast. 

Copies me. No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. 

1. Continue to prove my claim...no thoughts of his own.

Doesn't require debunking. 

"Same eyes"   

Never demonstrated.

"To which thread are you referring?"   

Never answered..

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Doesn't require debunking. 

 

         That's what someone who can't debunk a claim would say. 

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

         That's what someone who can't debunk a claim would say.

I've already done it...

Your refusal to look at the unambiguous evidence is a Vegas problem. 
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

I've already done it...

Your refusal to look at the unambiguous evidence is a Vegas problem.

You have no such thing. Not even once.