Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Trump abruptly scraps signing of landmark executive order regulating AI
Trump abruptly scraps signing of landmark executive order regulating AI
By Vegas
22 May 2026 11:09 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 posts • Page 1 of 1
22 May 2026 11:09 am
Trump believes regulating AI will lose our competitiveness against China. I knew this would happen. Money always takes priority over safety. Always. I have been advocating regulations on AI since it's its advent into mainstream. This isn't some hoax like climate change or Covid. This is real. I don't want to ban AI and I am definitely not against it. However, it needs to be regulated. it is too powerful. We haven't even seen the best of it. What we see now is just the tip of the ice burgh. Just wait to see it in 5 years. It's going to be irreversibly dangerous.
Hey MAGA. Can you just pause your pro-Trump stance for a moment and look at this objectively? Trump made a huge mistake. Huge. And we all will be paying for it in a few years...except the billionaires. they will make serious bank.
Hey MAGA. Can you just pause your pro-Trump stance for a moment and look at this objectively? Trump made a huge mistake. Huge. And we all will be paying for it in a few years...except the billionaires. they will make serious bank.
President Trump abruptly delayed the signing of a landmark executive order on AI Thursday afternoon, telling reporters that he had pulled the order at the last minute because it could interfere with American competitiveness on AI.“We’re leading China, we’re leading everybody, and I don’t want to do anything that’s going to get in the way of that lead,” Trump, answering reporters’ questions in the Oval Office during an unrelated event, said about America’s AI industry. “I really thought [the order] could have been a blocker.” The order, reportedly in development for weeks, was expected to direct federal agencies to shore up key cybersecurity defenses and work with the world’s leading AI companies on a voluntary basis to test advanced models before they are public, according to two people familiar with the draft.The order’s planned debut came less than two months after AI company Anthropic’s Mythos Preview model demonstrated the novel ability to autonomously discover thousands of severe and critical cyber vulnerabilities, including in leading operating systems and web browsers.
Trump abruptly scraps signing of landmark executive order regulating AI
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
23 May 2026 1:24 pm
So nobody is worried about this? Come on, MAGA. There are a lot more of you on here than libs. I am going to save this thread. In 5 years, I will be proven right. Then I am going to spew out one obnoxious "I told you so."
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
23 May 2026 2:06 pm
The order wasn’t “landmark.” It wasn’t even binding. It was a voluntary testing framework and a cybersecurity memo. Not a ban. Not a licensing regime. Not a regulatory structure. Not enforcement. Not oversight. Saying this is “landmark regulation” is like saying BV is an Intermediate skier.Vegas » 46 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So nobody is worried about this? Come on, MAGA. There are a lot more of you on here than libs. I am going to save this thread. In 5 years, I will be proven right. Then I am going to spew out one obnoxious "I told you so."
23 May 2026 2:14 pm
Yes, you are correct: "Money"Vegas » Yesterday, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ Trump believes regulating AI will lose our competitiveness against China. I knew this would happen. Money always takes priority over safety. Always. I have been advocating regulations on AI since its advent into the mainstream. This isn't some hoax like climate change or Covid. This is real. I don't want to ban AI and I am definitely not against it. However, it needs to be regulated. it is too powerful. We haven't even seen the best of it. What we see now is just the tip of the ice burgh. Just wait to see it in 5 years. It's going to be irreversibly dangerous.
Hey MAGA. Can you just pause your pro-Trump stance for a moment and look at this objectively? Trump made a huge mistake. Huge. And we all will be paying for it in a few years...except the billionaires. They will make serious bank.
"America cannot lead in AI if our policy is determined by whichever billionaire gets the President on the phone last."
https://senmarkkellyaz.substack.com/p/t ... s-why-that
yeah you 
--->Read me : )
Yer…. Entertaining and I make you
. Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it.
--->Read me : ) Yer…. Entertaining and I make you
. Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it.
23 May 2026 2:20 pm
This Substack piece is classic panic‑bait bull ****. It calls a voluntary memo ‘landmark regulation,’ pretends delaying a photo‑op is the same as abandoning AI safety, and ignores that the EO wouldn’t have changed a single thing about Anthropic, China, or model capabilities. Its fear dressed up as analysis. You have to be a G'damn **** idiot to think this means something.
23 May 2026 2:22 pm
Always an excuse. Not a wise idea to advertise your affiliation with ALPFA. Like I told you before, you are a **** idiot.MR-7 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ This Substack piece is classic panic‑bait bull ****. It calls a voluntary memo ‘landmark regulation,’ pretends delaying a photo‑op is the same as abandoning AI safety, and ignores that the EO wouldn’t have changed a single thing about Anthropic, China, or model capabilities. Its fear dressed up as analysis. You have to be a G'damn **** idiot to think this means something.
yeah you --->Read me : )
Yer…. Entertaining and I make you . Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it.
--->Read me : ) Yer…. Entertaining and I make you
. Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it.
23 May 2026 2:30 pm
Kelly wrote a political Substack, not a technical analysis. He is a PIECE OF ****. kelly is a LOSER and a **** TRAITOR.
23 May 2026 5:35 pm
You are correct. But If this is only voluntary and modest, why was it too dangerous to keep? If it was only voluntary testing, cybersecurity coordination, and risk assessment, then it would not have crippled American innovation. it was a modest first step, not heavy-handed regulation. If even a voluntary framework is considered too much, then the real objection seems to be oversight itself. America keeps its edge by building AI that is powerful, trustworthy, secure, and resilient.MR-7 » Today, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ The order wasn’t “landmark.” It wasn’t even binding. It was a voluntary testing framework and a cybersecurity memo. Not a ban. Not a licensing regime. Not a regulatory structure. Not enforcement. Not oversight. Saying this is “landmark regulation” is like saying BV is an Intermediate skier.
Now we don't even have a first step anymore.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
23 May 2026 11:18 pm
Trump was too busy with his fuxk iran coloring book to actually govern THE UNITED STATES.Vegas » Yesterday, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ Trump believes regulating AI will lose our competitiveness against China. I knew this would happen. Money always takes priority over safety. Always. I have been advocating regulations on AI since its advent into the mainstream. This isn't some hoax like climate change or Covid. This is real. I don't want to ban AI and I am definitely not against it. However, it needs to be regulated. it is too powerful. We haven't even seen the best of it. What we see now is just the tip of the ice burgh. Just wait to see it in 5 years. It's going to be irreversibly dangerous.
Hey MAGA. Can you just pause your pro-Trump stance for a moment and look at this objectively? Trump made a huge mistake. Huge. And we all will be paying for it in a few years...except the billionaires. They will make serious bank.
We come 20th with the fat lying goon. But is little bitches will cling to that soft orange dick.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
24 May 2026 6:27 am
Vegas » 22 May 2026, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ Trump believes regulating AI will lose our competitiveness against China. I knew this would happen. Money always takes priority over safety. Always. I have been advocating regulations on AI since its advent into the mainstream. This isn't some hoax like climate change or Covid. This is real. I don't want to ban AI and I am definitely not against it. However, it needs to be regulated. it is too powerful. We haven't even seen the best of it. What we see now is just the tip of the ice burgh. Just wait to see it in 5 years. It's going to be irreversibly dangerous.
Hey MAGA. Can you just pause your pro-Trump stance for a moment and look at this objectively? Trump made a huge mistake. Huge. And we all will be paying for it in a few years...except the billionaires. They will make serious bank.
Hey *******, it takes LAWS to regulate anything. An EO doesn't do that.
But you get your pantaloons all on a **** uproar over what?? A BIG NOTHINGBURGER!!
An EO without CONGRESS ACTING is NOT CONSTITUTIONAL!!
But we know how much you TOTALITARIANS LOVE YOU SOME MORE GOVERNMENT CONTROLLING THE UNIVERSE!!
Now, go **** yourself. We all see how much you are willing to give up 100% of your freedom for someone to tell you what to think and how to behave.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
24 May 2026 11:56 am
trump is losing his grip in washington.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump was too busy with his **** iran coloring book to actually govern THE UNITED STATES.
We come 20th with the fat lying goon. But his little bitches will cling to that soft orange dick.
Neffie was celebrating the fat **** coloring Iran with the American flag - like that's an accomplishment.
24 May 2026 12:04 pm
Why? Your wife already does a great job with that. Tell her she gives great blowjobs.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
24 May 2026 10:16 pm
The recent spate of primaries suggests otherwise. He's got that jew money behind him.
But let's hope.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
25 May 2026 6:17 am
Vegas » Yesterday, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Why? Your wife already does a great job with that. Tell her she gives great blowjobs.
FACTS trigger you to tell more lies??
Haven't you discovered that LIES always get you caught in more lies trying to cover your first lie??
Gee, you're one massive ******* PIECE OF ****!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
25 May 2026 10:16 am
You first need to catch me in a lie. The only thing you showed about my OP is that it triggered your tantrum.Beekeeper » Today, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑ FACTS trigger you to tell more lies??
Haven't you discovered that LIES always get you caught in more lies trying to cover your first lie??
Gee, you're one massive ******* PIECE OF ****!!
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
25 May 2026 11:23 am
Vegas » Today, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ You first need to catch me in a lie. The only thing you showed about my OP is that it triggered your tantrum.
The LIE is that the EO would NOT have done a DAMN THING to "regulate" AI!!
PERIOD!!
And you fell for it, regurgitated it, and now want to stand by it!!
We call you and your ilk, IDIOTS!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
25 May 2026 11:38 am
Fair point. A voluntary federal framework for testing advanced AI models before public release would have done absolutely nothing , in the same way a speed bump does nothing because it isn’t a brick wall.Beekeeper » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The LIE is that the EO would NOT have done a DAMN THING to "regulate" AI!!
PERIOD!!
And you fell for it, regurgitated it, and now want to stand by it!!
We call you and your ilk, IDIOTS!!
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
17 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 4544 users online :: 3 registered, 14 bots, and 4527 guests
Bots: aiohttp, proximic, Not, Pinterest, CriteoBot, ADmantX, YandexBot, DuckDuckGo, Baiduspider, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, curl/7, bingbot