Is it more harmful to have a third party run when it makes democracy mathematically impossible?

User avatar
By Vegas
1 post • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
Vegas
Today 11:40 am
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,119 posts
Some simple math that even @Blackvegetable  might understand...well I doubt he will, but the rest of you can get it. 

Assume we have three candidates that won the following percentage of votes:

Candidate A: 32%
Candidate B: 30%
Candidate C: 38%

So candidate C wins. But 32% + 30% = 62%. So that means 62% of society didn't want candidate C and only 38% did. That doesn't seem much like a majority rules outcome. Though I understand we don't have a pure democracy, we have a republic. Be that as it may, even as a republic and with an electoral college, the mathematical outcome will always be the same. 

I guess no electoral system is perfect. 
 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
1 post • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 5735 users online :: 15 registered, 19 bots, and 5701 guests
Bots: facebookexternalhit, Pinterest, Kinza, TTD-Content, LCC, DuckDuckBot, DuckDuckGo, SMTBot, libwww-perl, proximic, CriteoBot, ADmantX, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, curl/7, Applebot, Googlebot, bingbot
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search