#uramaninadress
#******
Good one Johnny!
DEVO.. Are we not men?.. Whip it Good..*Roshambo » 18 Jun 2026, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ Good one Johnny!
JuCo is exactly as you described it to be.
JuCo. #mangina
Yeah,no ****. So why don't you answer any so we can have a DIOLGUE to reach the truth? It goes both ways you cowardly POS.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2026, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ This is a pile of blather..
The "ancient Greeks" didn't run from all questions....Questions are an essential part of any dialogue in pursuit of Truth.
No ****. Then level 2+ starts from there. You barely reach level 1, then demand someone else to conduct level 2+ from there, while you drill them with 500k questions/demand and answer none.
It is not the method but the men who make the difference. The men whose argumentation you rightly hold as the ideal were ubermenschen, likely with some mysterious access to stimulating their pineal gands. The men you rightly point to as failures are in fact apprentice ****-gibbons.Vegas » 17 Jun 2026, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ I read a lot of ancient Greek philosophy. I believe they understood what debate meant. Their one goal was to arrive at the truth. Even if it was a small bit. They considered that an enormous victory. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras ( highly intelligent, but also an asshole), Parmenides, Zeno, and many others had only one goal when debating. To help each other arrive at the truth. If they arrived at an irrefutable conclusion, then they all won. If not, then they kept trying.
Today? It's about a winner and a loser. It's not about finding the truth. Hell, someone can be completely full of ****, but still declared a winner of a debate simply because they talk cunningly and know how to manipulate the conversation more than their opponent. Yet, they are still full of ****.
The most common tactic that thse ignorant sleazy fools use these days is to respond to questions with questions, avoid answering directly, and make the other person defend themselves instead.
We all know @Blackvegetable does this. K'fools (Andrew Wilson) does it repeatedly. Charlie Kirk did it incessantly.
Truth be told, I really don't know what you said here, but for some reason it was still hilarious anyway.Cannonpointer » 18 Jun 2026, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ It is not the method but the men who make the difference. The men whose argumentation you rightly hold as the ideal were ubermenschen, likely with some mysterious access to stimulating their pineal gands. The men you rightly point to as failures are in fact apprentice ****-gibbons.
You cannot compare ubermenschen to apprentice **** gibbons, and then blame the measuring stick for the difference. If the apprentice ****-gibbons DID use the Socratic Method, it would be a disaster. To the untrained, it would refute the Socratic Method itself. Only those with zoology degrees would recognize the real problem - **** slingers.
Well, apprentice **** slingers.
That was my own take away, precisely.Vegas » 18 Jun 2026, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Truth be told, I really don't know what you said here, but for some reason it was still hilarious anyway.![]()
![]()
![]()
Socrates was known to keep a fat kid on a rope to cryCannonpointer » 18 Jun 2026, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ It is not the method but the men who make the difference. The men whose argumentation you rightly hold as the ideal were ubermenschen, likely with some mysterious access to stimulating their pineal gands. The men you rightly point to as failures are in fact apprentice ****-gibbons.
You cannot compare ubermenschen to apprentice **** gibbons, and then blame the measuring stick for the difference. If the apprentice ****-gibbons DID use the Socratic Method, it would be a disaster. To the untrained, it would refute the Socratic Method itself. Only those with zoology degrees would recognize the real problem - **** slingers.
Well, apprentice **** slingers.
I am familiar with that cry. But chatgpt isn't. It rendered it:Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2026, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Socrates was known to keep a fat kid on a rope to cry
οὐκ ἔστιν ἐρωτήματα, λουτὴρ σφαίρας!
If BV is nothing but a sophist, why does he ALWAYS nail it?Vegas » 17 Jun 2026, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ I read a lot of ancient Greek philosophy. I believe they understood what debate meant. Their one goal was to arrive at the truth. Even if it was a small bit. They considered that an enormous victory. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras ( highly intelligent, but also an asshole), Parmenides, Zeno, and many others had only one goal when debating. To help each other arrive at the truth. If they arrived at an irrefutable conclusion, then they all won. If not, then they kept trying.
Today? It's about a winner and a loser. It's not about finding the truth. Hell, someone can be completely full of ****, but still declared a winner of a debate simply because they talk cunningly and know how to manipulate the conversation more than their opponent. Yet, they are still full of ****.
The most common tactic that thse ignorant sleazy fools use these days is to respond to questions with questions, avoid answering directly, and make the other person defend themselves instead.
We all know @Blackvegetable does this. K'fools (Andrew Wilson) does it repeatedly. Charlie Kirk did it incessantly.
You couldn't nail your foot to the floor.Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2026, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ If BV is nothing but a sophist, why does he ALWAYS nail it?
Every single time..
I bet you can....because you practice every day.
He would point the gun the wrong way.and hit his dick.Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2026, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑ I bet you can....because you practice every day.
Try nailing your head to a coffee table.
I have heard the sex lives of the rich and famous Ancient Greeks would make today's pedophiles look like saints.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2026, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Socrates was known to keep a fat kid on a rope to cry
οὐκ ἔστιν ἐρωτήματα, λουτὴρ σφαίρας!

#theVaGirony
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Not even once.Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2026, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ If BV is nothing but a sophist, why does he ALWAYS nail it?
Every single time..
you can tell me…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom