Liberal Forum

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395


The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336


You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.


viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764


OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 


viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764


OK...too cruel





Bueller?

There are, literally, 100s like them....except for the last one, of course...

Blackvegetable » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

There are, literally, 100s like them....except for the last one, of course...

Yes!  Another meltdown call out thread!  Gotta be a record.

Stickied to show what a real meltdown looks like.

Huey » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

Stickied to show what a real meltdown looks like.

and what the **** is the point of the OP from no stand anyway? every quote he relays could be his, other than the last…SMH…just an attention seeking child…like his sok, noIQ…

Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 7:46 am

Yes!  Another meltdown call out thread!  Gotta be a record.

Indisputably a runner.

Why can’t you give the definition of “woman”? 

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69068

How do you know you prefer women? You can't define woman.   

A better question is, for the sake argument, do you prefer Traditional Women? Or the modern day version? But even that depends on your definition. 

And how do you know all the "women" you claim to have been with were women if you can't define woman?

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/68718

To be clear you are on record as not being able to define woman, she, and daughter.  Once you post that definition, in your own words as I did,  we can continue.

One for one situation.  Keep running.  

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2045747&liberal ... d#p2045747

not seeing your definition of what a women is, @Blackvegetable  

You are as **** crazy as Tavy is.

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/790206

Now you may ask yourself 

"What's wrong with this ****?"
 

This is an impressive volume of words from which to run....

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 8:54 am

This is an impressive volume of words from which to run....

 

Since you have decided to PG my comments, I'm done here.  Talk to yourself.
 

Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 9:23 am

Since you have decided to PG my comments, I'm done here.  Talk to yourself.

If you can find the comment deserving better, post it.

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:19 am

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395

The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336

You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK...too cruel

Bueller?

All I see is the obsession that dopey liberals like you have regarding what determines the sex of human beings.
And the fact is that those of us with working brains don't need to be dragged into a dissertation on how a determined liberal thinks he can change that determination. 

So like Huey says, "Talk to yourself", fool!
Or just continue playing with yourself till you figure it out!
 

Zeets2 » 25 Jun 2026, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 11:50 am

All I see is the obsession that dopey liberals like you have regarding what determines the sex of human beings.
And the fact is that those of us with working brains don't need to be dragged into a dissertation on how a determined liberal thinks he can change that determination. 

So like Huey says, "Talk to yourself", fool!
Or just continue playing with yourself till you figure it out!

They're @*TinyVictim's words...

 

Blackvegetable » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

They're @*TinyVictim's words...

Yeah, and it's good advice for ALL who are as dumb as you to spend time trying to establish such a ridiculous left-wing agenda that feels the need to try to redefine the genetic makeup of humans.

But it's your time to waste, and obviously you don't care HOW stupid it makes you appear!
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:19 am

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395

The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336

You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK...too cruel

Bueller?

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:19 am

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395


The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336


You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.


viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764


OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 


viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764


OK...too cruel





Bueller?

this species has two reproductive genders never same ancestors any generation gap since inception of ancestral lineages so far.

Male or female body type isn't a state of mind after birth. Birth defects can create an illusion of an ancestor having both genitalia, but it is still just a birth defect of the individual or inherited chromosomes of a previous ancestor in the chain of events to conceptions sustaining ancestral lineages alive each next rotation of the planet revolving around a specific star, in a specific galaxy, in this specific moment.

Series parallel time displaced means spontaneously one of a kind simultaneously evolving now as conceived by previous ancestry and not become 1 of 2 [parents since birth.

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:19 am

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395

The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336

You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK...too cruel

Bueller?

 

ROG62 » 25 Jun 2026, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 3:38 pm

your cowardice is illegible 

Zeets2 » 25 Jun 2026, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 12:30 pm

Yeah, and it's good advice for ALL who are as dumb as you to spend time trying to establish such a ridiculous left-wing agenda that feels the need to try to redefine the genetic makeup of humans.

But it's your time to waste, and obviously you don't care HOW stupid it makes you appear!

You're a **** idiot.

Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 9:23 am

Since you have decided to PG my comments, I'm done here.  Talk to yourself.

You really needed ANOTHER example of the fruitcake's cowardice to know how it was gonna go?
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 3:41 pm

your 

Not about me, ****** gallery…