When young people tell him they see the economy as bad and it's difficult to get a job, no matter what kind of job he probably says "hang in there, things will get better"
Or he'll say "join the military and die for Israel."
They all work for the Epstein class.
Two cheeks of the same ***.
Including tRumP?
Trump was a DEMOCRAT for most of his life you **** retard
The Uniparty SUCKS. No difference in the two
So what did **** achieve that is oh so much better than what the DimoCraps accomplished?
Record deficits? More wars for Izrahell? Financialization of the economy and corporate takeover of 'Murica?
Durden is a **** idiot
Durden is just a pseudonym for the various people who run the **** known as ZH...you mean Kunstler the author of the hit pieceBlackvegetable » Today, 5:13 am » wrote: ↑ Durden is a **** idiot
You can see how this summer, and the nauseating slide down to the midterm elections, are shaping up. The party of “Our Democracy” is desperate to an extreme now, all disfigured by a communist leprosy eating away at its public face (and a cancer of fraud metastasizing through its innards). It has become such an obvious monster, raging with its hair lit-up, that anyone with half a functioning brain is shying away, stealing off into the gloaming. The party has nothing left but chaos and, in the weeks ahead, anything that might be disrupted probably will be.
what has any socialist candidate, or officeholder, ever done that compares to the Ballroom and Arch?
I know...I think I finished the book.LowIQTrash » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Durden is just a pseudonym for the various people who run the **** known as ZH...you mean Kunstler the author of the hit piece
But yes, it is quite amusing you bring up the socialist candidates, since the DSA is actually gaining a lot of seats this election cycle (something I would not have been aware of if not progressive YouTubers bragging and boasting of their victories)
JohnnyYou » Today, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑ 75% of Democrats polled say stop feeding the Israeli tit.
AIPAC is an abomination..
You mean like giving away the Panama Canal, despite 90% of Americans wanting to keep it?Blackvegetable » Today, 5:13 am » wrote: ↑ Durden is a **** idiot
You can see how this summer, and the nauseating slide down to the midterm elections, are shaping up. The party of “Our Democracy” is desperate to an extreme now, all disfigured by a communist leprosy eating away at its public face (and a cancer of fraud metastasizing through its innards). It has become such an obvious monster, raging with its hair lit-up, that anyone with half a functioning brain is shying away, stealing off into the gloaming. The party has nothing left but chaos and, in the weeks ahead, anything that might be disrupted probably will be.
what has any socialist candidate, or officeholder, ever done that compares to the Ballroom and Arch?
What do you mean "giving it away"?RebelGator » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You mean like giving away the Panama Canal, despite 90% of Americans wanting to keep it?
**** off.
Come on down Keyboard Komando. Let’s discuss in person,.Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ **** off.
Words have meaning, even if you struggle with them...
Huey » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Come on down Keyboard Komando. Let’s discuss in person,.Blackvegetable » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ **** off.
Words have meaning, even if you struggle with them...
In your own words I was within 33 miles of you for a week.
You APPEARED briefly 33 miles short - in a vast crowd.Huey » Today, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑
In your own words I was within 33 miles of you for a week.
I accept your surrender on the issue of the Carter/Clinton giving control (giving it away) of the Panama Canal.
Where do you "see" this?Huey » Today, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑
I accept your surrender on the issue of the Carter/Clinton giving control (giving it away) of the Panama Canal.
Blackvegetable » Today, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ You APPEARED briefly 33 miles short - in a vast crowd.
You stopped to huddle 42 miles short.
Blackvegetable » Today, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑Where do you "see" this?Huey » Today, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑
I accept your surrender on the issue of the Carter/Clinton giving control (giving it away) of the Panama Canal.
There's nothing to refute.Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I see you started to divert and you did not post anything that refuted my post.
Let me know when you do, punk.