Makes on wonder if she’s a citizen…what a piece of work…Beekeeper » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Now we have MORE than proof!! Seeing how a JUDGE said "Take a plea deal of we go to trial"!!
Oh, and what did they use to CHEAT WITH?? MAIL IN BALLOTS!! So, @Blackvegetable , if it doesn't make ANY DIFFERENCE in the outcomes, why did a JUDGE ORDER A NEW ELECTION, ****??
Oh that's right, because CHEATING BY **** IS RAMPANT AND CHANGING THE RESULTS OF ELECTIONS!! AND IT's HAPPENING in EVERY STATE where DHIMOCRAPS are "in charge" of elections
An absentee ballot scandal in Bridgeport, Connecticut, already forced the state’s largest city to throw out a Democratic mayoral primary and hold it again.
Now, a local judge is forcing two Democratic operatives at the center of the case to plead guilty or risk facing a jury trial. Former local Democratic Party official Wanda Geter-Pataky and Democratic city Councilman Alfredo Castillo have until Aug. 25 to accept plea agreements, and they face more than 100 charges combined over Bridgeport’s 2019 and 2023 mayoral primaries.
The case carries significance beyond one heavily blue city. For years, Democrats and election officials have bristled at Republican warnings about absentee voting and ballot drop boxes. Bridgeport, however, offers a documented example that is difficult to explain away. The evidence came from city-owned cameras and even persuaded a judge that the rightful winner could not be determined without a redo.
The controversy began in September 2023 after Mayor Joe Ganim (D) defeated his Democratic challenger John Gomes by 251 votes in the mayoral primary. Gomes won at polling places, but Ganim prevailed after building a 694-vote advantage among absentee ballots.
Four days later, Gomes’s campaign posted excerpts on Facebook from security cameras outside the city government complex, according to CT Mirror. The footage allegedly showed Geter-Pataky making repeated early-morning visits to a drop box and depositing stacks of absentee ballots.
Democratic operatives accused of ballot tampering told to take deal or face trial
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom What's so damn funny, which it's really not, is that they used this SAME METHOD to stuff the ballot boxes in 2020 for BYE-dumb's "win"!! AND THEY DENY THAT IT HAPPENS!! Even though we caught them on camera stuff ballots into these g'damn drop boxes all over the nation, and especially in the swing states that mattered. AND True the Vote PROVED IT over and over. Even had SURVEILENCE FOOTAGE showing them STUFFING these drop boxes with MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL BALLOTS!! Yet, the MSM tried their best to "debunk" it and "dismiss" it as if it was a "lie" and "****"!! Now this??
Beekeeper » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What's so damn funny, which it's really not, is that they used this SAME METHOD to stuff the ballot boxes in 2020 for BYE-dumb's "win"!! AND THEY DENY THAT IT HAPPENS!! Even though we caught them on camera stuff ballots into these g'damn drop boxes all over the nation, and especially in the swing states that mattered.
Blackvegetable » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The creators and publisher of the 2020 election conspiracy film "2000 Mules" retracted and pulled the project from distribution following a defamation lawsuit. The retractions involved publisher Salem Media Group and director Dinesh D'Souza apologizing to a Georgia voter who was falsely accused of illegal ballot harvesting. [1, 2, 3]
Publisher and Director Apologies
• Salem Media Group retraction: On May 31, 2024, the publisher pulled the film and accompanying book from its platforms and issued a public apology. They settled a defamation lawsuit filed by Mark Andrews, an Atlanta-area voter.
• Dinesh D'Souza statement: On December 2, 2024, D'Souza published a separate statement admitting that the surveillance videos used in the film were not actually correlated with the cellphone geolocation data as originally claimed. He apologized to Andrews for the false accusations. [3, 5]
The Defamation Lawsuit
• Mark Andrews case: The Georgia Bureau of Investigation cleared Andrews in May 2022, proving he was legally dropping off ballots for his own family members living at the same address.
• False portrayal: Despite this, the film used footage of Andrews to claim ballot drop box crimes were occurring, leading to intense harassment and threats against him and his family. [1, 2, 4] AI responses may include mistakes. [1] https://www.npr.org/2024/05/31/g-s1-229 ... -apology[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/02/us/p ... ump.html[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Mules[4] https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -pulled/[5] https://www.npr.org/2024/12/02/g-s1-365 ... es-apology
FJB » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ All the cheating is coming out now... democrats have to cheat to win.
:die:Beekeeper » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ AWWWWW. ONE person. Out of HOW MANY THOUSAND that were DROPPING BALLOTS IN MASSIVE NUMBERS???
IFl this is all you have,
natch...Beekeeper » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Psssst. It was the FILM, not the FINDINGS of True the Vote that was "debunked". And even THAT was only due to ONE ERROR by the filmmaker, not the FINDINGS!!
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ The creators and publisher of the 2020 election conspiracy film "2000 Mules" retracted and pulled the project from distribution following a defamation lawsuit. The retractions involved publisher Salem Media Group and director Dinesh D'Souza apologizing to a Georgia voter who was falsely accused of illegal ballot harvesting. [1, 2, 3]
Publisher and Director Apologies
• Salem Media Group retraction: On May 31, 2024, the publisher pulled the film and accompanying book from its platforms and issued a public apology. They settled a defamation lawsuit filed by Mark Andrews, an Atlanta-area voter.
• Dinesh D'Souza statement: On December 2, 2024, D'Souza published a separate statement admitting that the surveillance videos used in the film were not actually correlated with the cellphone geolocation data as originally claimed. He apologized to Andrews for the false accusations. [3, 5]
The Defamation Lawsuit
• Mark Andrews case: The Georgia Bureau of Investigation cleared Andrews in May 2022, proving he was legally dropping off ballots for his own family members living at the same address.
• False portrayal: Despite this, the film used footage of Andrews to claim ballot drop box crimes were occurring, leading to intense harassment and threats against him and his family. [1, 2, 4] AI responses may include mistakes. [1] https://www.npr.org/2024/05/31/g-s1-229 ... -apology[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/02/us/p ... ump.html[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Mules[4] https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -pulled/[5] https://www.npr.org/2024/12/02/g-s1-365 ... es-apology

Nope.
Blackvegetable » Today, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ No...
You cited a fraud at which point I kicked your ***.
No...you didn't