nefarious101 » 42 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ so you just walk around pulling fast ones for guys you don't even know?
How much does one of your "pulling a fast one" cost.....or is it a complimentary service?

Beekeeper » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ IT must REALLY SUCK being as **** STUPID as you are, ****!!
Legal Claims and Court Decisions
- The Challenge: Plaintiffs claimed districts 4, 5, and 6 lacked proper compactness and divided closely tied communities in the Kansas City area.
- The Defense: State officials argued the map followed boundaries well and fit state constitutional standards.
- The Ruling: The Missouri Supreme Court ruled that challengers did not prove the map broke Article III, Section 45 of the Missouri Constitution, keeping the map in place
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hey MORON, your OP was about REDISTRICTING being "Unconstitutional"!!jerrab » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
“Amendments 4 and 5 have been buried so deep in citizen rejection, they should never come back,” said Scott Charton, spokesman for the two Missouri Realtor-funded opposition groups, Missourians for Fair Governance and Missourians for Fair Taxation.One measure of the magnitude of the “no” vote is that it created a mirror image of the majority requirement Amendment 4 would have imposed on constitutional amendments proposed by initiative. Amendment 4 would have required amendments to achieve a majority in every congressional district in order to pass///////// a big defeat for republicans. Trump can't use tax payer to pay cop beaters
You are not American.nefarious101 » 50 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How much does one of your "pulling a fast one" cost.....or is it a complimentary service?
By a republican court.Beekeeper » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Hey MORON, your OP was about REDISTRICTING being "Unconstitutional"!!
Now THIS to cover the *** KICKING I ADMINISTERED BEUTIFULLY?? And left you with a BLOODY STUMP in cutting off your entire ARM!!!
How cute, sugartits. YOU LOST!!
240_F_20596295_tmjLAXudcMZ8StFyLliR0yzZS4TpY56I.jpg (360×240)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
T g e voters b adBeekeeper » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Hey MORON, your OP was about REDISTRICTING being "Unconstitutional"!!
Now THIS to cover the *** KICKING I ADMINISTERED BEUTIFULLY?? And left you with a BLOODY STUMP in cutting off your entire ARM!!!
How cute, sugartits. YOU LOST!!
240_F_20596295_tmjLAXudcMZ8StFyLliR0yzZS4TpY56I.jpg (360×240)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bees of a hive stick together . Cheer it up. The hope is there is hope 2026
Arre you poleing a fast one on GRNDR again?Beekeeper » Today, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey MORON, your OP was about REDISTRICTING being "Unconstitutional"!!
Now THIS to cover the *** KICKING I ADMINISTERED BEUTIFULLY?? And left you with a BLOODY STUMP in cutting off your entire ARM!!!
How cute, sugartits. YOU LOST!!
240_F_20596295_tmjLAXudcMZ8StFyLliR0yzZS4TpY56I.jpg (360×240)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
--------------------Beekeeper » Today, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey MORON, your OP was about REDISTRICTING being "Unconstitutional"!!
Now THIS to cover the *** KICKING I ADMINISTERED BEUTIFULLY?? And left you with a BLOODY STUMP in cutting off your entire ARM!!!
How cute, sugartits. YOU LOST!!
240_F_20596295_tmjLAXudcMZ8StFyLliR0yzZS4TpY56I.jpg (360×240)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I will proudly admit that I would wipe my *** with any Democrat legislation.
SouthernFried » Today, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I will proudly admit that I would wipe my *** with any Democrat legislation.
I won't be part of your reality while I am part of evolving in plain sight.Johnny You » Yesterday, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Join the Deadbeat club
https://youtu.be/PBAl9cchQac?si=gclALoal6_Yxuobb
jerrab » Yesterday, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑ --------------------
e Pushback: Voting advocates and the ACLU state that the Missouri Constitution guarantees citizens the right to petition and hold a referendum on any act of the legislature, making the rejection an unconstitutional silencing of voters
https://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/mi ... r-electionBeekeeper » Today, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑ No, ******* ****, it MEANS that the MAPS ARE GOING TO BE USED AND THAT THEY ARE CONSTITUTIONAL!!!
No one gives 2 **** what YOU or any of your **** MORONS think. ESPECIALLY the ACLU or any other LEFTIST COMMIE "group"!!
YOU LOST!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Incorrect.RebelGator » Yesterday, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ You wouldn't know the constitution from a bowel movement.
Beekeeper » Today, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑ They can "state" that the sky is purple with sprinkles in it, but that doesn't make it a fact, ASSHOLE ****!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The COURTS RULED it's a CONSTITUTIONAL MAP and even the NEW MAP shows COMPACT DISTRICTS with EQUAL NUMBERS OF PEOPLE IN IT!!
That's all that's required BY LAW!!
**** OFF!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Because YOU LOST a couple of **** SEATS doesn't make it UNCONSTITUTIONAL, BITCH!!![]()
![]()
![]()
Paywall, dummy.jerrab » Yesterday, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ another fast one that crashed and burned![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... 98ef5.html