Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
This made me laugh part 76
This made me laugh part 76
By LowIQTrash
8 Aug 2026 10:25 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Yesterday 5:41 am
yet Real Median Household Income and Real Median Personal Income remained flat during the Obama administration…8 years of stagnation…*Roshambo » 09 Aug 2026, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ JuCo,
Obama was President January 20, 2009, to January 20, 2017. .
The major stock market crash associated with the period surrounding Barack Obama’s presidency was actually the culmination of the 2008 Great Recession, which began in December 2007 under President George W. Bush. The market hit its lowest cyclical bottom on March 6, 2009, shortly after Obama took office, before launching into one of the longest bull markets in history.
Obama built that, yes he did. He fixed what Bush **** up.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEPAINUSA672N
that’s the real measure, right, because as you would personally know, not everyone is in the market…
Don't be bitter 0-fer. SFGDS
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
Yesterday 6:15 am
Apparently he thinks 8 years of flat is a good thing…Fuelman » 09 Aug 2026, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ I thought my post was pretty straightforward, our retirement accounts were up $22k last week. While the OP waits for a crash, some of us are making money now.
I have no idea what kind of derangement brought up Obama. It appears these people pay their bills with percentages, we pay in cash.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." 
Yesterday 6:19 am
Did you hear Mayor Pete was having breast augmentation done?
Democrats are so precocious.
Yesterday 8:03 am
The mark from that Bitch Slap is going to last days!ROG62 » Yesterday, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑ yet Real Median Household Income and Real Median Personal Income remained flat during the Obama administration…8 years of stagnation…
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEPAINUSA672N
that’s the real measure, right, because as you would personally know, not everyone is in the market…
Don't be bitter 0-fer. SFGDS
The U.S. Stock Market Wealth Breakdown
The Top 10%: Own a record 87% to 93% of all stocks and mutual funds.
The Bottom 90%: Share the remaining 7% to 13% of the stock market combined.
The Bottom 50%: Collectively hold just 1% of total stock market wealth
Yesterday 8:05 am
You're a **** idiot.ROG62 » Yesterday, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑ yet Real Median Household Income and Real Median Personal Income remained flat during the Obama administration…8 years of stagnation…
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEPAINUSA672N
that’s the real measure, right, because as you would personally know, not everyone is in the market…
Don't be bitter 0-fer. SFGDS
Obama had to fill the crater left behind by the last guy for whom you cast consecutive votes.
Yesterday 8:55 am
It wasn't "flat", you **** idiot.
It dropped through 2013 and then rose aggressively.
How badly bruised do you and @Fuelman want to get over this?
Yesterday 8:57 am
@ROG62 will run from it even faster than you tend to.Fuelman » Yesterday, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ The mark from that Bitch Slap is going to last days!
The U.S. Stock Market Wealth Breakdown
The Top 10%: Own a record 87% to 93% of all stocks and mutual funds.
The Bottom 90%: Share the remaining 7% to 13% of the stock market combined.
The Bottom 50%: Collectively hold just 1% of total stock market wealth
Yesterday 9:15 am
The half *** is old news, we are dealing with the orange *** now.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ It wasn't "flat", you **** idiot.
It dropped through 2013 and then rose aggressively.
How badly bruised do you and @Fuelman want to get over this?
Seems odd to me that someone making a bit of money in one week of the markets sends you into a tizzy and off on a tangent about Obama.
You get some pot laced with something?
Yesterday 10:48 am
Do you want to go over the facts, or just soil yourself whining?Fuelman » Yesterday, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ The half *** is old news, we are dealing with the orange *** now.
Seems odd to me that someone making a bit of money in one week of the markets sends you into a tizzy and off on a tangent about Obama.
You get some pot laced with something?
Yesterday 10:55 am
The fact is we never saw a $22k increase in one week under Obama.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ Do you want to go over the facts, or just soil yourself whining?
Guess the Halfrican wasn't that great after all.
Yesterday 11:21 am
It's pointless..Fuelman » Yesterday, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ The fact is we never saw a $22k increase in one week under Obama.
Guess the Halfrican wasn't that great after all.
Yesterday 1:28 pm
You are correct, it is pointless to bring up Obama.
We are well into the 3rd phase of compounding interest and reinvestment. Being aggressive savers for many years made whoever is President irrelevant. All we need is average long term returns to remain fairly stable and money magic happens. That growth will overtake our income soon.
It's a good place to be, and getting there is not rocket science.
Yesterday 1:32 pm
Just stop.Fuelman » Yesterday, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You are correct, it is pointless to bring up Obama.
We are well into the 3rd phase of compounding interest and reinvestment. Being aggressive savers for many years made whoever is President irrelevant. All we need is average long term returns to remain fairly stable and money magic happens. That growth will overtake our income soon.
It's a good place to be, and getting there is not rocket science.
From January 2009 to January 2017, the S&P 500 generated a nominal price return of approximately 152.4% (rising from roughly 825 to 2,278). When including reinvested dividends, the total return over this eight-year span increased significantly higher, roughly doubling the price-only performance.
Yesterday 1:37 pm
For some, this might be true. Not for us. As a matter of fact our household income skyrocketed. Additionally Mrs. Roshambo made “mad money” in the stock market and other investments. Win win for some, not you, obviously.ROG62 » Yesterday, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑ yet Real Median Household Income and Real Median Personal Income remained flat during the Obama administration…8 years of stagnation…
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEPAINUSA672N
that’s the real measure, right, because as you would personally know, not everyone is in the market…
Don't be bitter 0-fer. SFGDS
JuCo, don’t be bitter. It is what it is.
yeah you 
--->Read me : ) Send me your address. You been dodging me boy.
Yer…. Entertaining and I make you
. Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it. You are Persistent, do better. Remember that.
Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??
--->Read me : ) Send me your address. You been dodging me boy.Yer…. Entertaining and I make you
. Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it. You are Persistent, do better. Remember that.Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??
Yesterday 1:39 pm
Republicans always **** it up.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑ You're a **** idiot.
Obama had to fill the crater left behind by the last guy for whom you cast consecutive votes.
yeah you --->Read me : ) Send me your address. You been dodging me boy.
Yer…. Entertaining and I make you . Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it. You are Persistent, do better. Remember that.
Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??
--->Read me : ) Send me your address. You been dodging me boy.Yer…. Entertaining and I make you
. Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it. You are Persistent, do better. Remember that.Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??
Yesterday 1:42 pm
And their rubes hold themselves blameless.
Yesterday 1:44 pm
From January 2009 to January 2017, the S&P 500 delivered a total return of approximately 235% with dividends reinvested. This translates into an annualized growth rate (CAGR) of roughly 16.3%.*Roshambo » Yesterday, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ For some, this might be true. Not for us. As a matter of fact our household income skyrocketed. Additionally Mrs. Roshambo made “mad money” in the stock market and other investments. Win win for some, not you, obviously.
JuCo, don’t be bitter. It is what it is.
Yesterday 2:27 pm
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Just stop.
From January 2009 to January 2017, the S&P 500 generated a nominal price return of approximately 152.4% (rising from roughly 825 to 2,278). When including reinvested dividends, the total return over this eight-year span increased significantly higher, roughly doubling the price-only performance.
You are a pinhead BV!Now tell everyone what percentage of investors were participating in a S&P index fund during that time frame. The numbers don't mean everyone was getting those returns.
It currently has just exceeded 50%, 9 years later.
You know as well as I do that professional money managers suck at beating the indices, like 90% failure rate.
I will agree the rich got richer under Obama, but everyone knows taking over in a recession is going to produce better numbers.
Golf clap for Obama!
Yesterday 2:33 pm
This is just getting worse and worse...Fuelman » Yesterday, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑
Now tell everyone what percentage of investors were participating in a S&P index fund during that time frame. The numbers don't mean everyone was getting those returns.
It currently has just exceeded 50%, 9 years later.
You know as well as I do that professional money managers suck at beating the indices, like 90% failure rate.
I will agree the rich got richer under Obama, but everyone knows taking over in a recession is going to produce better numbers.
Golf clap for Obama!
Yesterday 2:48 pm
My first post was talking about the increase in our retirement accounts last week, you turn around and say we did better under Obama. That spastic leap is on you and isn't true.
Who is online
In total there are 3289 users online :: 9 registered, 13 bots, and 3267 guests
Registered users: *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Squatchman, ROG62, ConservativeWave, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, nefarious101
Bots: DuckDuckBot, Bolt, CriteoBot, YandexBot, okhttp, proximic, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, ADmantX, bingbot, Applebot, curl/7, Baiduspider