Liberal Forum

Congress possesses a statutory mechanism to terminate a presidential national‑emergency declaration under the National Emergencies Act (NEA), but in practice overriding a President requires a veto‑proof two‑thirds majority in both chambers if the President vetoes the termination—a high political bar that makes legislative reversal uncommon [


A national emergency is defined as a situation that requires immediate governmental action to protect the nation, often declared by the President. This declaration allows the President to access special powers and resources to address the crisis effectively.Key Aspects of National Emergency and Presidential Power

• Legal Framework: The National Emergencies Act (NEA) of 1976 provides the legal basis for declaring a national emergency. It outlines the procedures and limitations on the President's powers during such declarations.
• Scope of Powers: When a national emergency is declared, the President can utilize various statutory provisions that grant additional authority, such as reallocating resources or implementing specific policies to manage the crisis.
• Duration and Oversight: Declarations of national emergencies are not indefinite; they must be reviewed and can be terminated by Congress. The NEA also sets expiration dates for emergencies unless renewed.
• Distinction from State Emergencies: It's important to differentiate between a national emergency declared by the President and a state of emergency declared by state governors, as they operate under different legal frameworks.
  
   ​​​​​​​

nefarious101 » Today, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:28 pm

Congress possesses a statutory mechanism to terminate a presidential national‑emergency declaration under the National Emergencies Act (NEA), but in practice overriding a President requires a veto‑proof two‑thirds majority in both chambers if the President vetoes the termination—a high political bar that makes legislative reversal uncommon [

A national emergency is defined as a situation that requires immediate governmental action to protect the nation, often declared by the President. This declaration allows the President to access special powers and resources to address the crisis effectively.Key Aspects of National Emergency and Presidential Power

• Legal Framework: The National Emergencies Act (NEA) of 1976 provides the legal basis for declaring a national emergency. It outlines the procedures and limitations on the President's powers during such declarations.
• Scope of Powers: When a national emergency is declared, the President can utilize various statutory provisions that grant additional authority, such as reallocating resources or implementing specific policies to manage the crisis.
• Duration and Oversight: Declarations of national emergencies are not indefinite; they must be reviewed and can be terminated by Congress. The NEA also sets expiration dates for emergencies unless renewed.
• Distinction from State Emergencies: It's important to differentiate between a national emergency declared by the President and a state of emergency declared by state governors, as they operate under different legal frameworks.
  
   

Won't work.

The reasons are laid out in OTHER statutory laws and "voter fraud" is NOT one of them that can be used to declare a national emergency. 

I can ASSURE you that even the SCOTUS would shut down any attempt to use the NEA to address voter fraud.

ALL the NEA did was put a time limit on National emergency declarations and added Congressional actions. It also shut down any existing declarations that were over 6 months old.

​​​​​​​

Beekeeper » Today, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:44 pm

Won't work.

The reasons are laid out in OTHER statutory laws and "voter fraud" is NOT one of them that can be used to declare a national emergency. 

I can ASSURE you that even the SCOTUS would shut down any attempt to use the NEA to address voter fraud.

ALL the NEA did was put a time limit on National emergency declarations and added Congressional actions. It also shut down any existing declarations that were over 6 months old.

 

There aren't a lot of rules or requirements for him to do it....it gives him significant latitude and authority 

we will see....let it play out or not 

Wouldn't you first have to prove there's widespread voter fraud?

Squatchman » Yesterday, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:04 pm

Wouldn't you first have to prove there's widespread voter fraud?

Where the **** have you been?

Squatchman » Yesterday, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:04 pm

Wouldn't you first have to prove there's widespread voter fraud?

we already did smelly snatch.....

fake news just hasn't allow you to hear about it yet

it's good that you admit you are a low information smelly snatch...even tho you accidentally admitted it 

nefarious101 » Yesterday, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:44 pm

There aren't a lot of rules or requirements for him to do it....it gives him significant latitude and authority 

we will see....let it play out or not

Well, the one that makes it not going to happen is that there MUST be a law in place that covers such declarations. Election Fraud isn't one of those.

 

Beekeeper » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

Well, the one that makes it not going to happen is that there MUST be a law in place that covers such declarations. Election Fraud isn't one of those.

national security is.....if our nation is at risk.....that is a national emergency...

provable collusion between a national party and a foreign government is a national emergency

A political party creating an illegal invasion of non citizens voting in large number in an attempt to rig an election is a national emergency

nefarious101 » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

national security is.....if our nation is at risk.....that is a national emergency...

provable collusion between a national party and a foreign government is a national emergency

A political party creating an illegal invasion of non citizens voting in large number in an attempt to rig an election is a national emergency

That's your OPINION and has no basis in laws that permit any Executive order for a national emergency.

Now, if there was a foreign military invasion involved, maybe. Hell, the COURTS struck down all attempts to declare the illegal alien invasion as a "national emergency", so good luck with making an election one!!

Beekeeper » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

That's your OPINION and has no basis in laws that permit any Executive order for a national emergency.

Now, if there was a foreign military invasion involved, maybe. Hell, the COURTS struck down all attempts to declare the illegal alien invasion as a "national emergency", so good luck with making an election one!!

went and found this for ya....starts around the 2 minute 30 second mark

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VggvRoVIw2Q

nefarious101 » Today, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:39 am

national security is.....if our nation is at risk.....that is a national emergency

  Our nation isn't at risk. 
 Elections were still held during every war we've been involved in.
You're just flailing now.
I thought you won?
What's the matter,not so confident that Republicans can win the midterms with trump's ****?
  
 

Squatchman » Today, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:48 am

  Our nation isn't at risk. 
 Elections were still held during every war we've been involved in.
You're just flailing now.
I thought you won?
What's the matter,not so confident that Republicans can win the midterms with trump's ****?

Well Smelly Snatch...

The people that matter say it is....

losing has consequences