Liberal Forum

         

But...but...muh supply side economixKz...muh tax cuts...job growth... <- (Reality: Zero net jobs created under Shrub, after the next stock market CRASH Donny will have the same result...          )

https://www.reddit.com/r/economicCollap ... _matter_i/

When you print your own currency it doesn't matter - except it does.
 The bond yield goes up, cost of the financing goes up.
 Japan is broke, China isn't buying the debt anymore, Donny burned bridges. The music is stopping. Bush tax cuts for the wealthy have a cost and it's ten years of recession.

I would make that 15-18 years of a BEAR market incoming!!!      
 

Alternative Interpretations: Rather than a multi-decade bear market, other analysts view the underlying 16-to-18-year cadence as a foundation for long-term secular bull upside over the broader horizon

LowIQTrash » Today, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:10 pm

         

But...but...muh supply side economixKz...muh tax cuts...job growth... <- (Reality: Zero net jobs created under Shrub, after the next stock market CRASH Donny will have the same result...          

https://www.reddit.com/r/economicCollap ... _matter_i/

I would make that 15-18 years of a BEAR market (1 interim bear market rally lasting several years) incoming!!!    

When I took reagan's and carter's stats side by side with my own analysis, he was entirely incapable of disputing a word of it. It literally ran him off the board in humiliation.

His first critique was a fallacy from authority, insisting that I present NOT my own opinion, but the opinions of "respected sources." He had no idea that relying on others for one's thoughts is effeminate.

He ran like a scalded dog. That was a good time, good time.
 

Cannonpointer » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

When I took reagan's and carter's stats side by side with my own analysis, he was entirely incapable of disputing a word of it. It literally ran him off the board in humiliation.

His first critique was a fallacy from authority, insisting that I present NOT my own opinion, but the opinions of "respected sources." He had no idea that relying on others for one's thoughts is effeminate.

He ran like a scalded dog. That was a good time, good time.

Clem was fun.

Eclektic Skeptic vs Golfboy was epoch.

I can get 3% match at work..  Not sure if I should  right now..
 

JohnnyYou » Today, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:17 pm

Clem was fun.

Eclektic Skeptic vs Golfboy was epoch.

I can get 3% match at work..  Not sure if I should  right now..

Glory Hole Clem was a retahd. Skeptic and golfboy were dimwits. 

A 3% match nullifies inflation, traditionally. But now there is trump...
 
 

Cannonpointer » Today, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:11 pm

When I took reagan's and carter's stats side by side with my own analysis, he was entirely incapable of disputing a word of it. It literally ran him off the board in humiliation.

His first critique was a fallacy from authority, insisting that I present NOT my own opinion, but the opinions of "respected sources." He had no idea that relying on others for one's arguments is effeminate.

He ran like a scalded dog. That was a good time, good time.

He claimed that CARTER was to blame for Reagan's lackluster "stats" at the beginning of his term.

Because that's all the economy boils down to...a bunch of numbers some installed bureaucrat can manipulate or lie about at the ownership clique's discretion...  

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 10:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:57 pm

He claimed that CARTER was to blame for Reagan's lackluster "stats" at the beginning of his term.

Because that's all the economy boils down to...a bunch of numbers some installed bureaucrat can manipulate or lie about at the ownership clique's discretion...  

Ironically, RAYGUN was the first pResidenT who started cooking the numbers. His bureaucrats added military service members to the totally employed persons count.

He also stopped counting people as unemployed when their benefits ran out. And for the purpose of children's lunches at school, he made ketchup a vegetable. 

He was a real scamp, that one. Quite the rascal. 
 

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 10:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:57 pm

He claimed that CARTER was to blame for Reagan's lackluster "stats" at the beginning of his term.

Because that's all the economy boils down to...a bunch of numbers some installed bureaucrat can manipulate or lie about at the ownership clique's discretion...  

Ironically, RAYGUN was the first pResidenT who started cooking the numbers. His bureaucrats added military service members to the totally employed persons count.

Trump made 1000 trades this month...

Berkshire Hathaway got sold, whatever that is..  Buffet???

Ketchup is a vegetable? Did Rich get a job with Trump?

Cannonpointer » Today, 2:05 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:05 am

He also stopped counting people as unemployed when their benefits ran out.

That's  done all the time now?

And for the purpose of children's lunches at school, he made ketchup a vegetable. 

He was a real scamp, that one. Quite the rascal.

Is the Rascal Reagan or Clem?  ****.. Jimmy Carter.. I've been jacked on second post today...
 
Astronauts live for days on tubular food..

JohnnyYou » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

 
Astronauts live for days on tubular food..

So does 'Shamboner. 

RebelGator » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

So does 'Shamboner.

You're  well done steak with ketcheptables..

We all eat better than Mitch.. Entoteric feeding is disgusting..

B,B,B,Big Shambonna..  Natalie got in the helicopter  yesterday ...