This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..

User avatar
By Blackvegetable
25 Aug 2026 11:44 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4
User avatar
Blackvegetable
25 Aug 2026 11:44 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,374 posts
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP874nyKq/


This guy is The ****

The hauteur

The Public School Pong

The hair

The signet ring

The accent


 
User avatar
Vegas
25 Aug 2026 1:06 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,961 posts
Blackvegetable » 25 Aug 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP874nyKq/

This guy is The ****

The hauteur

The Public School Pong

The hair

The signet ring

The accent
You are owed a spam. Enjoy:

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

 
 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Vegas
25 Aug 2026 1:06 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,961 posts
Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Vegas
25 Aug 2026 1:07 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,961 posts
Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Vegas
25 Aug 2026 1:07 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,961 posts
Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Vegas
25 Aug 2026 1:08 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,961 posts
Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Vegas
25 Aug 2026 1:08 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,961 posts
Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Blackvegetable
25 Aug 2026 1:12 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,374 posts
Vegas » 25 Aug 2026, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ You are owed a spam. Enjoy:

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
I see no reason why you can't be asked to demonstrate an understanding of what is discussed in the "citation"..

​​​​​​​Do you understand the point about the Triffin Paradox? 
User avatar
Vegas
25 Aug 2026 1:16 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,961 posts
Blackvegetable » 25 Aug 2026, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I see no reason why you can't be asked to demonstrate an understanding of what is discussed in the "citation"..

Do you understand the point about the Triffin Paradox?
I can safely assume that you think that Triffin Paradox is also my rule that I came up with.  :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Blackvegetable
25 Aug 2026 1:24 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,374 posts
Vegas » 25 Aug 2026, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I can safely assume that you think that Triffin Paradox is also my rule that I came up with.  Image   Image   Image   Image   Image   Image

So, wayyyy over your head........again....
User avatar
Vegas
25 Aug 2026 1:35 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,961 posts
Blackvegetable » 25 Aug 2026, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ So, wayyyy over your head........again....

Nope. I am not the one that is utterly clueless about logical fallacies...Mr Prove a Negative. 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Blackvegetable
25 Aug 2026 3:36 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,374 posts
Vegas » 25 Aug 2026, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope. I am not the one that is utterly clueless about logical fallacies...Mr Prove a Negative.
You have a history of so doing.
User avatar
Beekeeper
25 Aug 2026 3:47 pm
User avatar
      
10,737 posts
Blackvegetable » 25 Aug 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP874nyKq/

This guy is The ****

The hauteur

The Public School Pong

The hair

The signet ring

The accent

NOW we have the COMMIE **** filled with VDS!!!

It must really SUCK being you, COMMIE ****!!!

PS. the HANDLE FITS PERFECTLY!!

:rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  

So what did you learn from Mr. Fudgepacker the Brit?? OTHER than he is a **** IDIOT, also filled with VDS/TDS!!  :die:   :die:   :die:   :die:  
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Vegas
25 Aug 2026 3:51 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,961 posts
Blackvegetable » 25 Aug 2026, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You have a history of so doing.
Of proving a negative?  :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   That is literally impossible you dumb asshole. 

More evidence you never went to college. 


1.  go ahead and post your AI crap, so I can debunk it again...thus more spam for repetitiveness. 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Blackvegetable
28 Aug 2026 6:55 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,375 posts
Vegas » 25 Aug 2026, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Of proving a negative?  Image   Image   Image   Image   That is literally impossible you dumb asshole. 

More evidence you never went to college. 

1.  go ahead and post your AI crap, so I can debunk it again...thus more spam for repetitiveness.
Tell me what you know about Exorbitant Privilege....


:rofl:  
 
User avatar
Blackvegetable
28 Aug 2026 7:29 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,375 posts
Beekeeper » 25 Aug 2026, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ NOW we have the COMMIE **** filled with VDS!!!

It must really SUCK being you, COMMIE ****!!!

PS. the HANDLE FITS PERFECTLY!!

Image   Image   Image   Image  

So what did you learn from Mr. Fudgepacker the Brit?? OTHER than he is a **** IDIOT, also filled with VDS/TDS!!  Image   Image   Image   Image
What did he get wrong?
User avatar
Beekeeper
28 Aug 2026 7:32 am
User avatar
      
10,737 posts
Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑ What did he get wrong?

What's not to loathe??

 
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Blackvegetable
28 Aug 2026 7:45 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,375 posts
Beekeeper » 28 Aug 2026, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑ What's not to loathe??
You're running from that as well.
User avatar
Beekeeper
28 Aug 2026 7:47 am
User avatar
      
10,737 posts
Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ You're running from that as well.

Nope. I was talking about WHAT'S NOT TO LOATHE ABOUT YOU, ****!!

But you are WAY to **** STUPID to understand that one.  :cw:   :cw:   :cw:  
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Beekeeper
28 Aug 2026 8:26 am
User avatar
      
10,737 posts
Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ You're running from that as well.

Oh, and if you're talking about Trump, I find NOTHING to loathe about him.

LOATHING is a trait of narcissists and mentally undeveloped losers in life. See how that fits totally to you?? Chase me
:rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  

Chase me.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
1 2 3 4

Who is online

In total there are 6009 users online :: 0 registered, 12 bots, and 5997 guests
Registered users:
Bots: aiohttp, GermCrawler, CriteoBot, proximic, ADmantX, Bolt, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, Googlebot, bingbot, curl/7
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search