Liberal Forum

Liberal Forum Archive ‹ Political Chat Rooms ‹ No Holds Barred Political Forum ‹ This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..

This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..

User avatar
By Blackvegetable
Yesterday 11:44 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Post Reply
14 posts • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
Blackvegetable
Yesterday 11:44 am
#1
#1 This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 11:44 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
56,996 posts
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP874nyKq/


This guy is The ****

The hauteur

The Public School Pong

The hair

The signet ring

The accent


 
User avatar
Vegas
Yesterday 1:06 pm
#2
#2 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 1:06 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,894 posts
Blackvegetable » Today, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 11:44 am
 https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP874nyKq/

This guy is The ****

The hauteur

The Public School Pong

The hair

The signet ring

The accent
You are owed a spam. Enjoy:

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

 
 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...


Image
User avatar
Vegas
Yesterday 1:06 pm
#3
#3 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 1:06 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,894 posts
Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...


Image
User avatar
Vegas
Yesterday 1:07 pm
#4
#4 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 1:07 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,894 posts
Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...


Image
User avatar
Vegas
Yesterday 1:07 pm
#5
#5 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 1:07 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,894 posts
Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...


Image
User avatar
Vegas
Yesterday 1:08 pm
#6
#6 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 1:08 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,894 posts
Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...


Image
User avatar
Vegas
Yesterday 1:08 pm
#7
#7 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 1:08 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,894 posts
Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...


Image
User avatar
Blackvegetable
Yesterday 1:12 pm
#8
#8 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 1:12 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
57,004 posts
Vegas » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
10 minutes ago
 You are owed a spam. Enjoy:

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Veghead's most recent gems:
  • Veghead: Shifting the Burden of Proof was Vegas's creation, not Aristotles over 2k years ago.
  • Veghead: There is no fallacy in proving a negative.
More evidence Veghead never went to college.
I see no reason why you can't be asked to demonstrate an understanding of what is discussed in the "citation"..

​​​​​​​Do you understand the point about the Triffin Paradox? 
User avatar
Vegas
Yesterday 1:16 pm
#9
#9 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 1:16 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,895 posts
Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
8 minutes ago
 I see no reason why you can't be asked to demonstrate an understanding of what is discussed in the "citation"..

Do you understand the point about the Triffin Paradox?
I can safely assume that you think that Triffin Paradox is also my rule that I came up with.  :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...


Image
User avatar
Blackvegetable
Yesterday 1:24 pm
#10
#10 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 1:24 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
57,005 posts
Vegas » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
9 minutes ago
 I can safely assume that you think that Triffin Paradox is also my rule that I came up with.  Image   Image   Image   Image   Image   Image

So, wayyyy over your head........again....
User avatar
Vegas
Yesterday 1:35 pm
#11
#11 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 1:35 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,896 posts
Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
11 minutes ago
 So, wayyyy over your head........again....

Nope. I am not the one that is utterly clueless about logical fallacies...Mr Prove a Negative. 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...


Image
User avatar
Blackvegetable
Yesterday 3:36 pm
#12
#12 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 3:36 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
57,009 posts
Vegas » Today, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 1:35 pm
 Nope. I am not the one that is utterly clueless about logical fallacies...Mr Prove a Negative.
You have a history of so doing.
User avatar
Beekeeper
Yesterday 3:47 pm
#13
#13 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 3:47 pm
User avatar
      
10,112 posts
Blackvegetable » Today, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 11:44 am
 https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP874nyKq/

This guy is The ****

The hauteur

The Public School Pong

The hair

The signet ring

The accent

NOW we have the COMMIE **** filled with VDS!!!

It must really SUCK being you, COMMIE ****!!!

PS. the HANDLE FITS PERFECTLY!!

:rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  

So what did you learn from Mr. Fudgepacker the Brit?? OTHER than he is a **** IDIOT, also filled with VDS/TDS!!  :die:   :die:   :die:   :die:  
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Vegas
Yesterday 3:51 pm
#14
#14 Re: This Is What Ticktock Was Made For....VP Couch Cushions v. Henry Fudge on Reserve Currency..
Yesterday 3:51 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,898 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
16 minutes ago
 You have a history of so doing.
Of proving a negative?  :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   That is literally impossible you dumb asshole. 

More evidence you never went to college. 


1.  go ahead and post your AI crap, so I can debunk it again...thus more spam for repetitiveness. 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...


Image
14 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 4753 users online :: 13 registered, 16 bots, and 4724 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: Feedfetcher-Google, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, Adsbot, NING, okhttp, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, proximic, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, CriteoBot, bingbot, curl/7, Baiduspider
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search