Blackvegetable » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Irrelevant.
He didn't pay 25 mill. for amusement.
He remains a felon
Your record in that regard really sucks.
Just shut the **** up
So why does this matter? It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury's $2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll's sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll.5 Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll's] breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape.”6 And while Mr. Trump is right that a $2 million award for such groping alone could well be regarded as excessive, that undermines rather than supports his argument. His argument is entirely unpersuasive.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-di ... 42632.html
The argument Kaplan addressed was in a PETITION.
Find some ice for that.
@Beekeeper
The JURY FOUND NO RAPE OCCURRED, ****!!Blackvegetable » 58 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Just shut the **** up
So why does this matter? It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury's $2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll's sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll.5 Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll's] breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape.”6 And while Mr. Trump is right that a $2 million award for such groping alone could well be regarded as excessive, that undermines rather than supports his argument. His argument is entirely unpersuasive.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-di ... 42632.html
The argument Kaplan addressed was in a PETITION.
Find some ice for that.
@Beekeeper
Beekeeper » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The JURY FOUND NO RAPE OCCURRED, ****!!
PERIOD!!
So, Trump's lawyers were 10000% CORRECT in their claim!! KAPLAN hated that FACT and wanted a rape verdict HE DIDN'T **** GET!!
Blackvegetable » Today, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You have absolutely no **** idea how stuff works....
They WEREN'T correct....the jury's VERDICT was UPHELD all the way through SCOTUS.
That was not the verdict.
I had to look up what rungs where..Blackvegetable » 56 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That was not the verdict.
It was a finding....and irrelevant.
https://share.google/4ciXy8kgt6tDKMyv6
Well bless your heart!! You're getting CLOSER to reality!!Blackvegetable » Today, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ That was not the verdict.
It was a finding....and irrelevant.
https://share.google/4ciXy8kgt6tDKMyv6
Beekeeper » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Well bless your heart!! You're getting CLOSER to reality!!
It was a FINDING OF NOT GUILTY OF RAPING "Ms/ Carroll"!!! Need to see the VERDICT FORM as it was CALLED BY THE COURT??
And it's the same as a VERDICT, ****!!
Now, tell us WHAT IS SAYS right at the beginning of the JURY VERDICT....
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
Does it say "VERDICT FORM"???
YOU are ONE STUPID MORONIC PIECE OF ****, ****!!
You know nothing.
You **** idiot,Beekeeper » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Well bless your heart!! You're getting CLOSER to reality!!
It was a FINDING OF NOT GUILTY OF RAPING "Ms/ Carroll"!!! Need to see the VERDICT FORM as it was CALLED BY THE COURT??
And it's the same as a VERDICT, ****!!
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ You **** idiot,
That isn't even the entire FIRST page.