Liberal Forum

Huey » 28 Aug 2026, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 2:16 pm

A grown man on ticktok.

I don't think you have much of an idea what TickTock is

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:38 pm

Irrelevant. 

He didn't pay 25 mill. for amusement. 

 He remains a felon

 Your record in that regard really sucks.

Just shut the **** up

So why does this matter? It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury's $2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll's sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll.5 Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll's] breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape.”6 And while Mr. Trump is right that a $2 million award for such groping alone could well be regarded as excessive, that undermines rather than supports his argument. His argument is entirely unpersuasive.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-di ... 42632.html

 The argument Kaplan addressed was in a PETITION. 

Find some ice for that.

@Beekeeper

He paid 25 mill because SETTLING was going to be cheaper in the long run, ****!!!

Like META did yesterday. ANY vomitary on that one, cupcake?? You're a **** IDIOT and a g'damn       

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:38 pm

Just shut the **** up

So why does this matter? It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury's $2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll's sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll.5 Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll's] breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape.”6 And while Mr. Trump is right that a $2 million award for such groping alone could well be regarded as excessive, that undermines rather than supports his argument. His argument is entirely unpersuasive.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-di ... 42632.html

 The argument Kaplan addressed was in a PETITION. 

Find some ice for that.

@Beekeeper

The JURY FOUND NO RAPE OCCURRED, ****!!

PERIOD!!

So, Trump's lawyers were 10000% CORRECT in their claim!! KAPLAN hated that FACT and wanted a rape verdict HE DIDN'T **** GET!!

What else you have, cupcake??

Beekeeper » 28 Aug 2026, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 2:32 pm

The JURY FOUND NO RAPE OCCURRED, ****!!

PERIOD!!

So, Trump's lawyers were 10000% CORRECT in their claim!! KAPLAN hated that FACT and wanted a rape verdict HE DIDN'T **** GET!!

 

You have absolutely no **** idea how stuff works....

They WEREN'T correct....the jury's VERDICT was UPHELD all the way through SCOTUS.

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 2:36 pm

You have absolutely no **** idea how stuff works....

They WEREN'T correct....the jury's VERDICT was UPHELD all the way through SCOTUS.

Yep!! THAT NOT GUILTY OF RAPE VERDICT!!

Sucks, huh, ****??

Hell, EVEN KAPLAN said that under NY's PENAL CODE, NO RAPE WAS FOUND TO HAVE HAPPENED!! But you FAIL ro realize that one cupcake!!

Chase me.        

Beekeeper » 28 Aug 2026, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 3:36 pm

Yep!! THAT NOT GUILTY OF RAPE VERDICT!!

That was not the verdict.

It was a finding....and irrelevant. 


https://share.google/4ciXy8kgt6tDKMyv6

 
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 4:02 pm

That was not the verdict.

It was a finding....and irrelevant. 

https://share.google/4ciXy8kgt6tDKMyv6

I had to look up what rungs where..

After inserting  ladders...
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 4:02 pm

That was not the verdict.

It was a finding....and irrelevant. 

https://share.google/4ciXy8kgt6tDKMyv6

Well bless your heart!! You're getting CLOSER to reality!!

It was a FINDING OF NOT GUILTY OF RAPING "Ms/ Carroll"!!! Need to see the VERDICT FORM as it was CALLED BY THE COURT??

And it's the same as a VERDICT, ****!!

Now, tell us WHAT IS SAYS right at the beginning of the JURY VERDICT....

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png


DOES IT SAY "VERDICT FORM"??

YOU are ONE STUPID MORONIC PIECE OF ****, ****!!

You know nothing. 
 
 

.

Beekeeper » 28 Aug 2026, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 5:26 pm

Well bless your heart!! You're getting CLOSER to reality!!

It was a FINDING OF NOT GUILTY OF RAPING "Ms/ Carroll"!!! Need to see the VERDICT FORM as it was CALLED BY THE COURT??

And it's the same as a VERDICT, ****!!



https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png



 

You **** idiot,

That isn't even the entire FIRST page.

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 6:05 pm

You **** idiot,

That isn't even the entire FIRST page.

It doesn't need to be to KICK YOUR STUPID ***!!! IT MAKES BOTH CLAIMS OF YOURS MOOT!!

You know NOTHING, ****!!

Keeo chasing me and see how many MORE times you get that *** BLISTERED!!           

Beekeeper » 29 Aug 2026, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑

29 Aug 2026, 6:25 am

It doesn't need to be to

Blackvegetable » 29 Aug 2026, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

29 Aug 2026, 11:17 am

Yep!!

And it STILL Says VERDICT FORM and it still says TRUMP DID NOT RAPE CARROLL!!

Twisting into something it's NOT is what IDIOTS AND **** ASSHOLES DO when their TDS is out of control massively!!

Like you do!! And are the **** biggest IDIOT of all times!!

Beekeeper » 29 Aug 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Aug 2026, 1:01 pm

Yep!!

And it STILL Says VERDICT FORM and it still says TRUMP DID NOT RAPE CARROLL!!


 

Had the jury voted yes on rape, would Grifty have gone to jail?


Cya..

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Aug 2026, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Aug 2026, 3:09 pm

Had the jury voted yes on rape, would Grifty have gone to jail?

Cya..

Oh, so NOW you are ADMITTING that Trump is NOT A RAPIST!! Seeing how the JURY found he DID NOT RAPE CARROLL!!

Making progress now, ****!!

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 2:01 pm

I'll take an example of Survivorship bias

I gave 2. This is redundancy. Expect spam.

Vegas » 29 Aug 2026, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Aug 2026, 5:51 pm

I gave 2. This is redundancy. Expect spam.

You didn't. 

You can't. 

You don't have any idea
 

Beekeeper » 29 Aug 2026, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Aug 2026, 4:27 pm

Oh, so NOW 

Answer the question first...

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Aug 2026, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Aug 2026, 6:48 pm

Answer the question first...

Sorry ****, but you've asked this question before, and it's been answered more than once!!

NO ONE is going to walk into your **** "trap questions", when the OBVIOUS is already there. Which it is here!! TRUMP IS NOT A RAPIST NOR A PEDOPHILE!! PERIOD!!                 

Now, admitting TRUMP WASN"T FOUND GUILTY OF ANY RAPE is a start for you in RECOVERING from your MSASIVE TDS, although I can assure you, professional mental illness help is going to assist you in recovering much faster. SEEK IT OUT!! TDS is a real thing and you are definitely a basket case full of it.
 

Beekeeper » 29 Aug 2026, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Aug 2026, 7:08 pm

Sorry ****, but 

I know...

You're a coward..

The answer is "No."

This is how even an idiot like you can be certain you are not looking at a VERDICT.

That was in favor of the plaintiff....in the amount of $2 million dollars.

Had Carrot Top had the **** sense to cut that check and stop there, we might very well not have an unambiguous indication of why the jury awarded that sum.

Thankfully, he is plenty stupid enough to force the issue...and when his attorneys do his bidding and petition the court for a reduction of the verdict

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll