PhiloBeddo » 18 Sep 2026, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ Nice try, Lefty. The Republicans are on the same page and doing well. Your anti American propaganda is worthless.
Huey » 18 Sep 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ I can't believe he is still using the daily beast after his recent debacle using them.
Huey » 18 Sep 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ I can't believe he is still using the daily beast after his recent debacle using them.
:die:
viewtopic.php?p=2931553#p2931553Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ There was never any "debacle", except in the retelling...
You’re right, brown, there never was a “debacle”…it was a **** “ TRAIN WRECK!”Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ There was never any "debacle", except in the retelling...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom It shows you being asked to post what The Beast got wrong....by actually quoting the Beast, or its sources.
A) you have no idea what this is aboutROG62 » 18 Sep 2026, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ You’re right, brown there never was a “debacle”…it was a **** “ TRAIN WRECK!”![]()
![]()
I did multiple times. You have already lost this debate. Hell, you started two diversion threads reframe.Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2026, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ It shows you being asked to post what The Beast got wrong....by actually quoting the Beast, or its sources.
And never doing so...
A) Quote the sourcesHuey » 18 Sep 2026, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ viewtopic.php?f=3&t=103562
On that thread he posted that the CEO of a company that was awarded the reflecting pool contract was being prosecuted for election fraud in his cut and paste OP from the daily beast. The problem was that the man was convicted of it a couple of years ago and the Supreme Court of NH OVERTURNED the conviction. There is no mention of this in his OP and the daily beast issued a correction later in the day.
Here is one:
viewtopic.php?p=2927910#p2927910Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2026, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ A) Quote the sources
B) That the conviction was reversed does not mean he was never convicted.
C) Until you can offer any evidence that the State has actually dropped the case, the logical conclusion is that his negotiations with the AG are for the purpose of settling it.
Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2026, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ Who's running this **** show?
Pentagon Pete’s Staff Mock His Wife With Brutal Nickname
After allegedly rubbing them the wrong way, staffers are calling Jennifer “Yoko Ono” behind her back, a source told the Daily Mail.
“Now there’s a woman with an extremely tight leash on the man she married,” the source told the publication.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/pentagon- ... -nickname/
https://youtu.be/Ge4n0PYpupU?is=eJZCFdzUfirwZz1j

:rofl:
I did multiple times. You have already lost this debate. Hell, you started two diversion threads reframe.Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2026, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑![]()
You're quite delusional..
You STILL haven't read the citation outlining the facts of the case and the "confession"