Liberal Forum

Who's running this **** show?

Pentagon Pete’s Staff Mock His Wife With Brutal Nickname

After allegedly rubbing them the wrong way, staffers are calling Jennifer “Yoko Ono” behind her back, a source told the Daily Mail. 

“Now there’s a woman with an extremely tight leash on the man she married,” the source told the publication.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/pentagon- ... -nickname/

https://youtu.be/Ge4n0PYpupU?is=eJZCFdzUfirwZz1j
 
 

Nice try, Lefty. The Republicans are on the same page and doing well. Your anti American propaganda is worthless.

PhiloBeddo » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Nice try, Lefty. The Republicans are on the same page and doing well. Your anti American propaganda is worthless.

I can't believe he is still using the daily beast after his recent debacle using them.

Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

I can't believe he is still using the daily beast after his recent debacle using them.

oh please do share 

Huey » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

I can't believe he is still using the daily beast after his recent debacle using them.

There was never any "debacle", except in the retelling...

 

BuckNaked » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

oh please do share

:die:  

this "debacle" exists only in vague narrative.

BuckNaked » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

oh please do share 

 

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=103562

On that thread he posted that the CEO of a company that was awarded the reflecting pool contract  was being prosecuted for election fraud in his cut and paste OP from the daily beast.  The problem was that the man was convicted of it a couple of years ago and the Supreme Court of NH OVERTURNED the conviction.  There is no mention of this in his OP and the daily beast issued a correction later in the day.

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

There was never any "debacle", except in the retelling...

 

 

viewtopic.php?p=2931553#p2931553

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

There was never any "debacle", except in the retelling...

You’re right, brown there never was a “debacle”…it was a **** “ TRAIN WRECK!”        
 

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

viewtopic.php?p=2931553#p2931553

It shows you being asked to post what The Beast got wrong....by actually quoting the Beast, or its sources.

And never doing so... 

ROG62 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You’re right, brown there never was a “debacle”…it was a **** “ TRAIN WRECK!”      

A) you have no idea what this is about

B) you wouldn't understand it if you did.


Get back to running.
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

It shows you being asked to post what The Beast got wrong....by actually quoting the Beast, or its sources.

And never doing so... 

 

I did multiple times.  You have already lost this debate.  Hell, you started two diversion threads reframe. 

I posted the original daily beast BS, then the corrected version.  

Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=103562

On that thread he posted that the CEO of a company that was awarded the reflecting pool contract  was being prosecuted for election fraud in his cut and paste OP from the daily beast.  The problem was that the man was convicted of it a couple of years ago and the Supreme Court of NH OVERTURNED the conviction.  There is no mention of this in his OP and the daily beast issued a correction later in the day.

A) Quote the sources

B) That the conviction was reversed does not mean he was never convicted.

C) Until you can offer any evidence that the State has actually dropped the case, the logical conclusion is that his negotiations with the AG are for the purpose of settling it.

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

I did multiple times.

You're lying.
 

BV is lying

Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

You're lying.
 

 

Here is one:

viewtopic.php?p=2927910#p2927910


Game over.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

A) Quote the sources

B) That the conviction was reversed does not mean he was never convicted.

C) Until you can offer any evidence that the State has actually dropped the case, the logical conclusion is that his negotiations with the AG are for the purpose of settling it.



 

viewtopic.php?p=2927910#p2927910

Game over
 
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:41 am

Who's running this **** show?

Pentagon Pete’s Staff Mock His Wife With Brutal Nickname

After allegedly rubbing them the wrong way, staffers are calling Jennifer “Yoko Ono” behind her back, a source told the Daily Mail. 

“Now there’s a woman with an extremely tight leash on the man she married,” the source told the publication.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/pentagon- ... -nickname/

https://youtu.be/Ge4n0PYpupU?is=eJZCFdzUfirwZz1j

the fake news dickhead strikes again....run dickhead run

The Criminal Left losing is losing it and we are going to get to see some spectacular crash outs

they are nice enough to show us a form of hysterical desperation that MAGA just loves to watch...

right before the midterms too
 

Huey » Today, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:32 am

 

Hell, you started two diversion threads reframe. 


 

:rofl:  

You're quite delusional..

You STILL haven't read the citation outlining the facts of the case and the "confession"

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

 

You're quite delusional..

You STILL haven't read the citation outlining the facts of the case and the "confession"

 

I did multiple times.  You have already lost this debate.  Hell, you started two diversion threads reframe. 

I posted the original daily beast BS, then the corrected version.