Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Game over on this argument, but watching you bend over backward to stay delusional is top-tier comedy.

What "argument" is that?

You don't have the onions to argue.

 

To make that stick, you’d actually have to define what you think we’re arguing and take a stand for once.
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

I'd ask, but given his complete inability to define a woman, basic anatomy is clearly far above his pay grade.

CuckREMF,

There's no question that my child is my own.
 

 

Says ROTC.  The real issue here isn't the argument—it's that you genuinely don't understand why that child is your own.

Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Says ROTC.  The real issue here isn't the argument—it's that you genuinely don't understand why that child is your own.

But we're both quite certain yours aren't. 

Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

To make that stick, you’d actually have to define what you think we’re arguing and take a stand for once.

You would have had to take a stand...

Cannonpointer » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

35 minutes ago

Plagiarism smelt...

There's a tool for that...

Get back to us...
 

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Huey » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Says ROTC.  The real issue here isn't the argument—it's that you genuinely don't understand why that child is your own.

But we're both quite certain yours aren't. 

 

There’s zero mistaking my three boys are mine—unlike your kid, who looks like she belong to the entire neighborhood.

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Huey » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

To make that stick, you’d actually have to define what you think we’re arguing and take a stand for once.

You would have had to take a stand...

 

Fascinating tactic, demand I take a stand while refusing to name the actual issue. Endless vagueness really is your only defense mechanism.

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

There’s zero mistaking my three boys are mine—unlike your kid, who looks like she belong to the entire neighborhood.

nothing like it, actually...


She looks like her mother....

Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Fascinating tactic, demand I take a stand 

This is my thread, Imbecile...

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Fascinating tactic, demand I take a stand 

This is my thread, Imbecile...

 

Mary, are we taking down your garbage original point on this thread, or are we sticking to the Supreme Court diversion you fled to when the first one imploded?  

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Mary, are we taking down your garbage original point on this thread, or are we sticking to the Supreme Court diversion you fled to when the first one imploded?

You've taken no stand on the former, and ran from the latter.


 

Blackvegetable » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

Mary, are we taking down your garbage original point on this thread, or are we sticking to the Supreme Court diversion you fled to when the first one imploded?

You've taken no stand on the former, and ran from the latter.


 

 

If your entire position hinges on anonymous sources and secondhand chatter, you haven't taken a stand—you've just admitted you have no real proof.  That is my stand on your OP, Douche.

Huey » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

If your entire position hinges on anonymous sources and secondhand chatter, you haven't taken a stand—

No, Coward..

what do you think this OP is about?

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:26 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:00 pm

If your entire position hinges on anonymous sources and secondhand chatter, you haven't taken a stand—

No, Coward..

what do you think this OP is about?

 

After allegedly rubbing them the wrong way, staffers are calling Jennifer “Yoko Ono” behind her back, a source told the Daily Mail. 

Do you have the names of the staffers?  If not, you have nothing but anonymous sources and second hand chatter, asshole.  Do not presume to say no to me, ****, if you do not have the names.

Huey » Today, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:57 am

After allegedly rubbing them the wrong way, staffers are calling Jennifer “Yoko Ono” behind her back, a source told the Daily Mail. 

Do you have the names of the staffers?  If not, you have nothing 

List your primary sources...

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:57 am

After allegedly rubbing them the wrong way, staffers are calling Jennifer “Yoko Ono” behind her back, a source told the Daily Mail. 

Do you have the names of the staffers?  If not, you have nothing 

List your primary sources...

 

Nice reframe. The link to my primary sources is in my sig box.  Where I listed them for you  before.  And you still have no names of these alleged staffers.  

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Nice reframe. 

No...answer first, coward...



 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Nice reframe. 

No...answer first, coward...



 

 

If you repost it I will either acknowledge or debate why you are wrong.  This is for clarification purposes.  

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:57 am

After allegedly rubbing them the wrong way, staffers are calling Jennifer “Yoko Ono” behind her back, a source told the Daily Mail. 

Do you have the names of the staffers?  If not, you have nothing 

List your primary sources...


 

Nice reframe. The link to my primary sources is in my sig box.  Where I listed them for you  before.  And you still have no names of these alleged staffers.  

 

 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Nice reframe. 

No...answer first, coward...



 

 

No, asshole.  I have answered that many times, asshole.  Click the **** link in my sig box or be labeled a liar forever.

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

If you repost it I will either acknowledge or debate why you are wrong.  This is for clarification purposes.

No...you will not...

Just scroll up.