Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Time To Break Up The Band?
Time To Break Up The Band?
By Blackvegetable
Today 8:41 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Today 11:15 am
@Blackvegetable
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Today 11:35 am
Then tell me who was to corroborate the confessor...
Today 11:50 am
That has nothing to do with the fact the original daily beast story you chose was wrong, had to be corrected and you did not mention that the case was overturned until I told you.
You have already lost this debate. Hell, you started two diversion threads reframe.
I posted the original daily beast BS, then the corrected version.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Today 12:10 pm
It has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you've been lying about having read the narrative of the facts of the case.
Today 12:13 pm
You story was wrong and had to be corrected. End of **** story.Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that you've been lying about having read the narrative of the facts of the case.
That has nothing to do with the fact the original daily beast story you chose was wrong, had to be corrected and you did not mention that the case was overturned until I told you.
You have already lost this debate. Hell, you started two diversion threads reframe.
I posted the original daily beast BS, then the corrected version.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Today 12:20 pm
It wasn't wrong...the information was supplemented.
As I've already told you, I learned about the reversal well before posting the thread...It took a lot of digging to confirm that he is a registered Republican.
You have lied for days about having read the narrative of the actual facts...
Today 12:24 pm
****. And you did not know about the **** CORRECTION until I told you. You are a POS liar.Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It wasn't wrong...the information was supplemented.
As I've already told you, I learned about the reversal well before posting the thread...It took a lot of digging to confirm that he is a registered Republican.
You have lied for days about having read the narrative of the actual facts...
Here it is again, ****.
The CORRECTED article said this:
Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud, according to CNN.
You posted this:
Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud, according to CNN.
That is not a supplement.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Today 12:24 pm
A) I do, actually…Blackvegetable » Today, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ A) you have no idea what this is about
B) you wouldn't understand it if you did.
Get back to running.
I’m running TOWARDS you, brown…like a FREIGHT TRAIN
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
Today 12:27 pm
that appears to be a contradiction of terms, numbnuts…once overturned, the former disappears because it can’t be used again…evah!Blackvegetable » Today, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ A) Quote the sources
B) That the conviction was reversed does not mean he was never convicted.
C) Until you can offer any evidence that the State has actually dropped the case, the logical conclusion is that his negotiations with the AG are for the purpose of settling it.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." 
Today 12:27 pm
Your claim was that he is currently being prosecuted. Within the ordinary understanding of workaday johnnies, that means a jury is seated and two jews are arguing - with a third jew reffing the squabble.Blackvegetable » Today, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑
B) That the conviction was reversed does not mean he was never convicted.
That is not the case. The man was NOT being tried for raping the vote within the ordinary understanding of most Americans.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 12:29 pm
That's "on trial"....prosecution necessarily precededs trial.Cannonpointer » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Your claim was that he is currently being prosecuted. Within the ordinary understanding of workaday johnnies, that means a jury is seated and two jews are arguing - with a third jew reffing the squabble.
That is not the case. The man was NOT convicted of raping the vote within the ordinary understanding of most Americans.
Today 12:30 pm
No...it was remanded back...ROG62 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ that appears to be a contradiction of terms, numbnuts…once overturned, the former disappears because it can’t be used again…evah!
Today 12:31 pm
He did. He quoted YOUR source.
It did not say what you said it said. You ALTERED the copy paste.
Old Confuscian saying: "When beginning with pure turd, do not add more turd."
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 12:31 pm
What is it about?ROG62 » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ A) I do, actually…
I’m running TOWARDS you, brown…like a FREIGHT TRAIN
Today 12:31 pm
The yumaniddy...
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 12:34 pm
But I didn't..Cannonpointer » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He did. He quoted YOUR source.
It did not say what you said it said. You ALTERED the copy paste.
Old Confuscian saying: "When beginning with pure turd, do not add more turd."
Now what?
Today 12:35 pm
He still hasn't gish-galloped HIMSELF?Blackvegetable » Today, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑
You're quite delusional..
You STILL haven't read the citation outlining the facts of the case and the "confession"
Did you REALLY just gish gallop by omission? By vague reference? Are you so **** lazy that you are genuinely down to insisting people owe it to you to present your gish gallops FOR YOU?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 12:36 pm
The conviction was “overturned”…
will he be “tried” again? 4 years and counting…tick, tock…tick, tock…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
Today 12:38 pm
Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ****. And you did not know about the **** CORRECTION until I told you. You are a POS liar.
Here it is again, ****.
The CORRECTED article said this:
Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud, according to CNN.
You posted this:
Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud, according to CNN.
That is not a supplement.
Of course I did, **** idiot..****. An
Google "Rosen voter fraud" and see how much you have to read before you know he's a republican.
He IS being prosecuted and he WAS convicted and you ARE. an idiot.
Today 12:38 pm
Cannonpointer » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He did. He quoted YOUR source.
It did not say what you said it said. You ALTERED the copy paste.
Old Confuscian saying: "When beginning with pure turd, do not add more turd."
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." Who is online
In total there are 2272 users online :: 11 registered, 13 bots, and 2248 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: axios, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, proximic, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, ADmantX, curl/7, bingbot, Applebot