Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Supreme Court that Left calls ‘biased’ was near unanimous 62% of the time
Supreme Court that Left calls ‘biased’ was near unanimous 62% of the time
By Huey
Today 10:47 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
12 posts • Page 1 of 1
The Supreme Court is once again under attack from those calling for packing, or even eliminating, the institution as hopelessly ideological and divided.
The Philadelphia Inquirer recently proclaimed that “The Supreme Court’s conservative majority keeps choosing ideology over impartiality.”
Other media outlets reported “devastating” polling showing the Court as unpopular and losing institutional respect.
It is all clearly alarming — despite being entirely untrue.
Looking at the actual rulings disproves the argument of a “biased” court
The Court ruled unanimously in more than 44% of cases, slightly up from the prior year.
When you add the roughly 11% of opinions that were 8-1 and 6% that were 7-1 or 7-2, the rate of unanimous or nearly unanimous jumps to 62%.
In over 77% of cases, there was no ideological split in the resulting opinions.
While slightly up, the ideological split emphasized in the coverage is found in less than a quarter of the cases.Now look at those supposed ideologically besieged liberal justices.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had the lowest percentage in the majority in the last term.
However, she was still in the majority in 72% of cases.
https://nypost.com/2026/09/18/opinion/s ... -the-time/
The Philadelphia Inquirer recently proclaimed that “The Supreme Court’s conservative majority keeps choosing ideology over impartiality.”
Other media outlets reported “devastating” polling showing the Court as unpopular and losing institutional respect.
It is all clearly alarming — despite being entirely untrue.
Looking at the actual rulings disproves the argument of a “biased” court
The Court ruled unanimously in more than 44% of cases, slightly up from the prior year.
When you add the roughly 11% of opinions that were 8-1 and 6% that were 7-1 or 7-2, the rate of unanimous or nearly unanimous jumps to 62%.
In over 77% of cases, there was no ideological split in the resulting opinions.
While slightly up, the ideological split emphasized in the coverage is found in less than a quarter of the cases.Now look at those supposed ideologically besieged liberal justices.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had the lowest percentage in the majority in the last term.
However, she was still in the majority in 72% of cases.
https://nypost.com/2026/09/18/opinion/s ... -the-time/
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
It’s only prevalent when the vote comes in split…then it’s quite telling…Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The Supreme Court is once again under attack from those calling for packing, or even eliminating, the institution as hopelessly ideological and divided.
The Philadelphia Inquirer recently proclaimed that “The Supreme Court’s conservative majority keeps choosing ideology over impartiality.”
Other media outlets reported “devastating” polling showing the Court as unpopular and losing institutional respect.
It is all clearly alarming — despite being entirely untrue.
Looking at the actual rulings disproves the argument of a “biased” court
The Court ruled unanimously in more than 44% of cases, slightly up from the prior year.
When you add the roughly 11% of opinions that were 8-1 and 6% that were 7-1 or 7-2, the rate of unanimous or nearly unanimous jumps to 62%.
In over 77% of cases, there was no ideological split in the resulting opinions.
While slightly up, the ideological split emphasized in the coverage is found in less than a quarter of the cases.Now look at those supposed ideologically besieged liberal justices.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had the lowest percentage in the majority in the last term.
However, she was still in the majority in 72% of cases.
https://nypost.com/2026/09/18/opinion/s ... -the-time/
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." 
Get the **** out of here with that ponce...Huey » Today, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ The Supreme Court is once again under attack from those calling for packing, or even eliminating, the institution as hopelessly ideological and divided.
The Philadelphia Inquirer recently proclaimed that “The Supreme Court’s conservative majority keeps choosing ideology over impartiality.”
Other media outlets reported “devastating” polling showing the Court as unpopular and losing institutional respect.
It is all clearly alarming — despite being entirely untrue.
Looking at the actual rulings disproves the argument of a “biased” court
The Court ruled unanimously in more than 44% of cases, slightly up from the prior year.
When you add the roughly 11% of opinions that were 8-1 and 6% that were 7-1 or 7-2, the rate of unanimous or nearly unanimous jumps to 62%.
In over 77% of cases, there was no ideological split in the resulting opinions.
While slightly up, the ideological split emphasized in the coverage is found in less than a quarter of the cases.Now look at those supposed ideologically besieged liberal justices.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had the lowest percentage in the majority in the last term.
However, she was still in the majority in 72% of cases.
https://nypost.com/2026/09/18/opinion/s ... -the-time/
This is for an audience of *******.
Blackvegetable » 44 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Get the **** out of here with that ponce...
This is for an audience of *******.
how far did ya get?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." ponceBlackvegetable » 44 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Get the **** out of here with that ponce...
This is for an audience of *******.
noun
- A pimp.
- A posh or effeminate person.
- To act as a pimp.
3x?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." To a "t"ROG62 » Today, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ ponce
nounverb
- A pimp.
- A posh or effeminate person.
- To act as a pimp.
Why? Because it didn't come from Vanity Fair or Soros funded MediasTouch?Blackvegetable » Today, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Get the **** out of here with that ponce...
This is for an audience of *******.
Johnny You: "Flying the pride flag is honorable".
Blackvegetable "9/11 had nothing to do with Muslims or Islam".
Blackvegetable "9/11 had nothing to do with Muslims or Islam".
It came through the NYPosr and Jonathan Turley..SouthernFried » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Why? Because it didn't come from Vanity Fair or Soros funded MediasTouch?
Do you even know who he is?
He ain't VanityFair or George Soros. So that's a big **** positive.Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It came through the NYPosr and Jonathan Turley..
Do you even know who he is?
Johnny You: "Flying the pride flag is honorable".
Blackvegetable "9/11 had nothing to do with Muslims or Islam".
Blackvegetable "9/11 had nothing to do with Muslims or Islam".
I take that as a "I have no idea, Master Vegetable. "SouthernFried » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He ain't VanityFair or George Soros. So that's a big **** positive.
I'm not saying that Jonathan Turley blurs the line between man and woman, I'm just pointing out that he has "fabulous skin"...
Well, bring the whole family.....Blackvegetable » Today, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Get the **** out of here with that ponce...
This is for an audience of *******.
12 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 2229 users online :: 12 registered, 13 bots, and 2204 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: axios, Bolt, curl/7, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, proximic, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Applebot, Googlebot