JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Seems clear to me.ROG62 » 04 Oct 2026, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Activist Judge Belies the Left’s Non-Citizen Voting Narrative…
Biden-appointed judge in southern Florida called the federal law banning non-citizen voting unconstitutional. US District Judge David Leibowitz of the Southern District of Florida dismissed federal charges against a Jamaican woman who voted in the 2020 presidential election, despite not being a citizen. He’s now being called an activist judge by conservatives. Are they right? Is non-citizen voting really a state issue? Well, it doesn’t take a law degree or years of experience in the courtroom to read the Constitution – and that doesn’t leave many alternatives.
In a 31-page ruling, Judge Leibowitz said the Constitution gives states the sole authority to determine who can vote in elections, not Congress. As such, the law used to prosecute Chelsea Cox was unconstitutional. “The Constitution commits to the States, and the states alone, the general power to set voter qualifications in federal elections,” he wrote. “This is clear from both the text of the document and the debates at the Constitutional Convention in 1787.”
When a federal judge says the Constitution is clear, that is the word of an expert, someone who knows – or, at least, should know – better than most. Frequently the Constitution is, in fact, not so clear. This time, however, it is. Here’s what it says in Article I, Section 4:
“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.”
https://www.libertynation.com/activist- ... tm_id=1037
“chusing”? yeah, it’s “crystal clear”…![]()
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I believe they call that a "Desperation Hail Mary"ROG62 » 04 Oct 2026, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Activist Judge Belies the Left’s Non-Citizen Voting Narrative…
Biden-appointed judge in southern Florida called the federal law banning non-citizen voting unconstitutional. US District Judge David Leibowitz of the Southern District of Florida dismissed federal charges against a Jamaican woman who voted in the 2020 presidential election, despite not being a citizen. He’s now being called an activist judge by conservatives. Are they right? Is non-citizen voting really a state issue? Well, it doesn’t take a law degree or years of experience in the courtroom to read the Constitution – and that doesn’t leave many alternatives.
In a 31-page ruling, Judge Leibowitz said the Constitution gives states the sole authority to determine who can vote in elections, not Congress. As such, the law used to prosecute Chelsea Cox was unconstitutional. “The Constitution commits to the States, and the states alone, the general power to set voter qualifications in federal elections,” he wrote. “This is clear from both the text of the document and the debates at the Constitutional Convention in 1787.”
When a federal judge says the Constitution is clear, that is the word of an expert, someone who knows – or, at least, should know – better than most. Frequently the Constitution is, in fact, not so clear. This time, however, it is. Here’s what it says in Article I, Section 4:
“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.”
https://www.libertynation.com/activist- ... tm_id=1037
“chusing”? yeah, it’s “crystal clear”…

I understand the non discussed loophole of your argument. the topic is who gets voted to the federal level of representation of people within the state. State politicians elected to offices of town hall, city hall, county seat, state level, federal level of congress or senate for the state electing them. Not for the presidential office. Since the president is a representative of all 50 states and US citizens regardless race, creed, color, national origin, gender, social narrative staging any form of New world Order by context over chromosomes physically living now.
Indeed….where they come up with this **** is mind boggling at best..l
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom One Off.. The woman probably voted by accident.ROG62 » 04 Oct 2026, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Indeed….where they come up with this **** is mind boggling at best..l
Wonder how they are going to explain the Right taking over in BrazilROG62 » 04 Oct 2026, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Indeed….where they come up with this **** is mind boggling at best..l

What separates a fraudulent vote from a person voting illegally? Ha ha ha ha ha ha.Johnny You » 05 Oct 2026, 4:09 am » wrote: ↑ One Off.. The woman probably voted by accident.
Let us know when you find millions of fraudulent votes.
Congres could interfere. But the assholes get sent home every time they convene over some controversy that MAGA Cuck Johnson runs from his responsibility as third in line to the Presidency and leader of the legislative check on executive power..