Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Barry supports 'Squad' member in lengthy post against Trump admin probe
Barry supports 'Squad' member in lengthy post against Trump admin probe
By Buck Naked
18 Oct 2026 11:02 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
18 Oct 2026 11:02 am
18 Oct 2026 11:19 am
O-Bummer says:
"It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say," Obama wrote Sunday on X. "But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota."
Flat out, Barrack is an idiot!
"It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say," Obama wrote Sunday on X. "But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota."
Flat out, Barrack is an idiot!
18 Oct 2026 1:22 pm
IOW, she’s “above the law”…someone needs to remind bo that the investigation started under joe’s watch…Fuelman » Today, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ O-Bummer says:
"It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say," Obama wrote Sunday on X. "But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota."
Flat out, Barrack is an idiot!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." 
18 Oct 2026 2:18 pm
You really are a sockpuppet...
....and a hypocrite.Fuelman » 18 Oct 2026, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ O-Bummer says:
"It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say," Obama wrote Sunday on X. "But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota."
Flat out, Barrack is an idiot!
How so?
Do be specific...
Don't take my word for it......MAGA MISFIT.
Critics of the Democratic Party and supporters of Donald Trump argue that Obama’s statement ignores a multi-year effort by Democrats to use the legal system against Trump, which they characterize as "lawfare." Their arguments include:
- The Post-Presidency Prosecutions: Trump faced dozens of felony charges across four distinct criminal indictments (brought by federal prosecutor Jack Smith, New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis). Trump's supporters argue these cases were politically motivated to interfere with his campaign and presidency.
- White House Response: In response to Obama's recent remarks, White House spokesperson Lauren Bis stated that "Unlike Joe Biden, President Trump has not weaponized the Department of Justice against his political foes," instead framing the current investigations as an effort to restore law and order.
- Systemic Bias: Critics contend that Democrats have normalized using congressional committees, special counsels, and local prosecutors to target their primary political rival, making complaints about the current targeting of a Democratic representative selective and inconsistent.
RebelGator » Yesterday, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ Don't take my word for it......MAGA MISFIT.
Critics of the Democratic Party and supporters of Donald Trump argue that Obama’s statement ignores a multi-year effort by Democrats to use the legal system against Trump, which they characterize as "lawfare." Their arguments include:
- The Post-Presidency Prosecutions: Trump faced dozens of felony charges across four distinct criminal indictments (brought by federal prosecutor Jack Smith, New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis). Trump's supporters argue these cases were politically motivated to interfere with his campaign and presidency.
- White House Response: In response to Obama's recent remarks, White House spokesperson Lauren Bis stated that "Unlike Joe Biden, President Trump has not weaponized the Department of Justice against his political foes," instead framing the current investigations as an effort to restore law and order.
- Systemic Bias: Critics contend that Democrats have normalized using congressional committees, special counsels, and local prosecutors to target their primary political rival, making complaints about the current targeting of a Democratic representative selective and inconsistent.
there's no evidence...Critics of the Democratic Party and supporters of Donald Trump argue that Obama’s statement ignores a multi-year effort by Democrats to use the legal system against Trump, which they characterize as "lawfare."
In fact, this **** AI slop precis wants to indict Obama for the appointment of Smith.
It also ignores that Grifty was SUCCESSFULLY prosecuted in local, not federal, courts.
Contrast this with the miserable records of DoJ and DC prosecutors toiling for Grifty.
In order to keep Grifty out of jail, Aileen Cannon had to rewrite existing law.
Yell, Uncle.....when you've had enough, Dodger.
The argument that former President Barack Obama was complicit in a coordinated effort to discredit and undermine Donald Trump is built on the premise that the highest levels of the executive branch and federal intelligence agencies were weaponized for partisan purposes. Often referred to in conservative circles as "Spygate" or "Obamagate," this viewpoint frames the events surrounding the 2016 election and the subsequent transition of power not as standard counterintelligence operations, but as an institutional effort to protect Hillary Clinton's candidacy and hobble the incoming Trump administration.
The core elements of the conservative argument regarding Obama's involvement include:
1. The Weaponization of the Intelligence Community.
A central pillar of the conservative perspective is that the Obama administration authorized or turned a blind eye to the politicization of the FBI, CIA, and Department of Justice.
- The Steele Dossier: Conservatives highlight that the FBI utilized the unverified, Clinton-campaign-funded Steele Dossier to secure Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants to spy on Trump campaign aide Carter Page. From a conservative viewpoint, the administration’s intelligence apparatus knowingly used a partisan opposition research document to justify domestic surveillance on a rival political campaign.
Declassified documents prove that the magic negro was the leader of the "Russiagate narrative".
Show me.Buffalo » Yesterday, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑ Declassified documents prove that the magic negro was the leader of the "Russiagate narrative".
**** rube.
But that's ****.RebelGator » Yesterday, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑ Yell, Uncle.....when you've had enough, Dodger.
The argument that former President Barack Obama was complicit in a coordinated effort to discredit and undermine Donald Trump is built on the premise that the highest levels of the executive branch and federal intelligence agencies were weaponized for partisan purposes. Often referred to in conservative circles as "Spygate" or "Obamagate," this viewpoint frames the events surrounding the 2016 election and the subsequent transition of power not as standard counterintelligence operations, but as an institutional effort to protect Hillary Clinton's candidacy and hobble the incoming Trump administration.
The core elements of the conservative argument regarding Obama's involvement include:
1. The Weaponization of the Intelligence Community.
A central pillar of the conservative perspective is that the Obama administration authorized or turned a blind eye to the politicization of the FBI, CIA, and Department of Justice.
- The Steele Dossier: Conservatives highlight that the FBI utilized the unverified, Clinton-campaign-funded Steele Dossier to secure Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants to spy on Trump campaign aide Carter Page. From a conservative viewpoint, the administration’s intelligence apparatus knowingly used a partisan opposition research document to justify domestic surveillance on a rival political campaign.
I knew, sooner or later, we would get to the crux of your argument.
Where's yours?RebelGator » Yesterday, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ I knew, sooner or later, we would get to the crux of your argument.
The majik negro isn't going to be happy after the midterms....Trump wants his hide and he will get it
**** you!!! Prove me wrong, ***!!!
Predictably..
nefarious101 » Yesterday, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ The majik negro isn't going to be happy after the midterms....Trump wants his hide and he will get it
How will Trump get it?
Who is online
In total there are 3692 users online :: 0 registered, 12 bots, and 3680 guests
Registered users:
Bots: Bolt, CriteoBot, Not, ADmantX, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Applebot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, DuckDuckBot