Liberal Forum

Th election with tax payer money.

legal scholars say that conditioning a massive government payout on a partisan electoral outcome skirts or violates the spirit of anti-corruption and anti-coercion laws, effectively treating public funds as leverage for party retention.

jerrab » Yesterday, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:00 pm

legal scholars say that conditioning a massive government payout on a partisan electoral outcome skirts or violates the spirit of anti-corruption and anti-coercion laws, effectively treating public funds as leverage for party retention.

****!  There's nothing wrong with telling the country his plans to provide every adult with a $5000 check if Republicans win control of Congress again.  The simple fact is that it's a well known fact that if he attempted to do so WITHOUT having control of Congress, the Democrats would never vote for it!

Only the dumbest Democrats can't see that simple fact!
 

Zeets2 » Yesterday, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:04 pm

****!  There's nothing wrong with telling the country his plans to provide every adult with a $5000 check if Republicans win control of Congress again.  The simple fact is that it's a well known fact that if he attempted to do so WITHOUT having control of Congress, the Democrats would never vote for it!

Only the dumbest Democrats can't see that simple fact!

this **** bitch whines about Biden spending, but hey what's another $1.2 trillion       
your seeds are tainted, and so is your brain.     
  
 

jerra » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 7:57 pm

Th election with tax payer money.

 

While I am against all these subsidies did you have a problem with Joe Biden's Covid checks?  I was against Trumps.

If not, STFU.

I await your diversion.

Zeets2 » Yesterday, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:04 pm

****!  There's nothing wrong with telling the country his plans to provide every adult with a $5000 check if Republicans win control of Congress again.  The simple fact is that it's a well known fact that if he attempted to do so WITHOUT having control of Congress, the Democrats would never vote for it!

Only the dumbest Democrats can't see that simple fact!

This is about the billions for farmers who are in a crunch because of his policies and mistakes

-------------------------
Republicans locked in tight races this November are desperately hoping the Trump administration’s last-minute gambit to send farmers $8 billion in taxpayer money will work.

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:08 pm

Zeets2 » Yesterday, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:04 pm

****!  There's nothing wrong with telling the country his plans to provide every adult with a $5000 check if Republicans win control of Congress again.  The simple fact is that it's a well known fact that if he attempted to do so WITHOUT having control of Congress, the Democrats would never vote for it!

Only the dumbest Democrats can't see that simple fact!

this **** bitch whines about Biden spending, but hey what's another $1.2 trillion       
your seeds are tainted, and so is your brain.     
  
 

 

Aw, there is the faux internet tough guy.  I am sorry you suffer ED and your old lady has to look elsewhere for satisfaction but there is no need to take it out on us.
 

Huey » Yesterday, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:09 pm

While I am against all these subsidies did you have a problem with Joe Biden's Covid checks?  I was against Trumps.

If not, STFU.

I await your diversion.

This is the result of trump's stupidy and American tax  payers are on the hook for 8 billion dollars,///////////////////----------------------
The war with Iran has triggered a severe agricultural crisis, spiking global costs for diesel and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers due to shipping disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz. Farmers face billions in added operating expenses, forcing cutbacks in field work, lower crop yields, and rising food price

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:08 pm

this **** bitch whines about Biden spending, but hey what's another $1.2 trillion       
your seeds are tainted, and so is your brain.   

this is not the first time he used  payer money to fix his **** ups.///////////////////--------------------

-------------------------
The escalating trade friction and retaliatory tariffs between the Trump administration and China have severely impacted American agriculture, forcing the federal government to deploy tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer-funded bailouts to stabilize rural economies.

 
 

Huey » Yesterday, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:20 pm

Aw, there is the faux internet tough guy.  I am sorry you suffer ED and your old lady has to look elsewhere for satisfaction but there is no need to take it out on us.

doily boy
You married that hore, your problem, not mine.
P.S. she hates you
 
 

jerrab » Yesterday, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:28 pm

this is not the first time he used  payer money to fix his **** ups.///////////////////--------------------

-------------------------
The escalating trade friction and retaliatory tariffs between the Trump administration and China have severely impacted American agriculture, forcing the federal government to deploy tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer-funded bailouts to stabilize rural economies.

With voting already underway for the 2026 midterm elections, President Donald Trump and members of his administration began to illegally and unconstitutionally use taxpayer funds for overtly political television advertisements that amounted to unlawful propaganda. 
 

I just love the way those with no cards have embraced desperation


as the midterms approach the desperation levels will be spectacular

imagine trying to accuse Trump of doing what they actually did....

irrational....that's the good kind of desperation...

nefarious101 » Yesterday, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:31 pm

I just love the way those with no cards have embraced desperation

as the midterms approach the desperation levels will be spectacular

imagine trying to accuse Trump of doing what they actually did....

irrational....that's the good kind of desperation...

lol trump is desperate

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:29 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:20 pm

Aw, there is the faux internet tough guy.  I am sorry you suffer ED and your old lady has to look elsewhere for satisfaction but there is no need to take it out on us.

doily boy
You married that hore, your problem, not mine.
P.S. she hates you
 
 

 

ED, just put the "w" in front of "hore".  You look dumber than normal.

Tell your old lady I am busy this weekend.  And let her know you all be on grinder.
 

jerra » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 7:57 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:09 pm

While I am against all these subsidies did you have a problem with Joe Biden's Covid checks?  I was against Trumps.

If not, STFU.

I await your diversion.

This is the result of trump's stupidy and American tax  payers are on the hook for 8 billion dollars,///////////////////----------------------
The war with Iran has triggered a severe agricultural crisis, spiking global costs for diesel and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers due to shipping disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz. Farmers face billions in added operating expenses, forcing cutbacks in field work, lower crop yields, and rising food price

 

Hello, granny, I was against ALL of trumps subsidy "stimulus" checks for any family making more than 70 grand.  Which included me.  I still had my job as did my wife.  I am on record here posting that.  You were asked if you were against Biden's checks.

You diverted.

Were you against Biden's subsidy "stimulus" checks for any family making more than 70 grand.  

Huey » Yesterday, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:35 pm

ED, just put the "w" in front of "hore".  You look dumber than normal.

Tell your old lady I am busy this weekend.  And let her know you all be on grinder.

 HORE, noun A woman, married or single, who indulges unlawful sexual intercourse; also, a prostitute; a common woman; a harlot; a woman of ill fame. [This word comprehends adultress and fornicatrix, and all lewd women whether paid for prostitution or not.]HORE, verb intransitive To indulge unlawful sexual commerce, as a male or female; to be habitually lewd.

Take the L   
 

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:57 pm

 HORE, noun A woman, married or single, who indulges unlawful sexual intercourse; also, a prostitute; a common woman; a harlot; a woman of ill fame. [This word comprehends adultress and fornicatrix, and all lewd women whether paid for prostitution or not.]HORE, verb intransitive To indulge unlawful sexual commerce, as a male or female; to be habitually lewd.

Take the L 

LMAO!


AI Overview
The term hore is an archaic spelling and historical variant of the word "whore", which can mean a sex worker, a derogatory term for a promiscuous person, or someone who compromises their morals for money. In Old and Middle English, it also carried alternative historical meanings related to physical dirt or gray hair

You left some out.  This is the 21st century, ED.  Tell your old lady I am busy this weekend and don't send me messages.  

Take your L, bitch.

jerrab » Yesterday, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:10 pm

This is about the billions for farmers who are in a crunch because of his policies and mistakes

-------------------------
Republicans locked in tight races this November are desperately hoping the Trump administration’s last-minute gambit to send farmers $8 billion in taxpayer money will work.

Actually, no!  What this is about is a relatively small price to pay to keep Iran from completing their nuclear weapons arsenal which would have endangered most of the world as they promised a nuclear holocaust.

Only leftist, Trump-hating idiots like yourself could possibly have approved of that alternative, when your last two idiot Democrat presidents stupidly tried and failed miserably at a cost of tens of billions of taxpayer dollars to bribe Iran into submission.

As a result, you no longer have ANY credibility on the issue, so you can shut the **** up going further.
 

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:08 pm

this **** bitch whines about Biden spending, but hey what's another $1.2 trillion       
your seeds are tainted, and so is your brain.   

And based on Biden's spending and the Democrats refusal to cut the spending that was shown to be fraudulent and wasteful by the DOGE committee, you haven't got a leg to stand on, and you have no credibility on the subject, so laugh all you want, asshole!
 

Huey » Yesterday, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:14 pm

LMAO!

AI Overview
The term hore is an archaic spelling and historical variant of the word "whore", which can mean a sex worker, a derogatory term for a promiscuous person, or someone who compromises their morals for money. In Old and Middle English, it also carried alternative historical meanings related to physical dirt or gray hair

You left some out.  This is the 21st century, ED.  Tell your old lady I am busy this weekend and don't send me messages.  

Take your L, bitch.

Hore 
Take the L